<3:1r>

Sir

According to my desire I have Receved from Mr Newton that kindeness of' your promiss: which weare Conserning that Small Table of' mine wch was of' the North Star's Hourly Altitude & Azimuth The Contents of' wch Answer is in theese Lines: Cambridge Sept 11th: 1678 Mr Storer I have Looked over your tables of' the North Star's hourly Altitudes & Azimuth: & doe not perceive but that they ar Suff'iciently {sic} Exact{.}

Only in the Table of' Azimuths at   ye  Lat'.  0degs=00min  at  ye  Hours   :8:4: :7:5: :6::6: :5:7: :8:4: I put downe for these hours1=12  d  :   min0=3700=000=371=12wch  is  ye  Norths Star's Altitude in  yt  Latitude for  wch  hours  ar put  instead of  ye  Azimuth wch  weare  p_  my Table as  Mr  Newton sett down thus2=05··2=19·02=242=19·2=05··

But if yt I should presisely have sett downe the the minnute & fractionall part of' a minute as my Calculatio Gave it & by the very same Radius by wch that table of' the North Star's Azimuth was Calculated then it will shew it as followeth for those hours 2degs04min..&..16142216 parts of a minute wch is for ye Hours of: 8  &  4& – 4  &  8 & for yeHours: 7  &  5  &  5  &  7: 219.  &  .1701770: parts of \a min/ But for the Hours of Both Sixes: 2degs:=24min=00 wch is the Stars distance from the pole: But if I should have beene so presise wth the degrees minutes & fractionall part of a Minute & so neare as was shewed by the calculation wch would have beene To the Thousand part of' a Minute or less: therfore I suppose it would have beene very Hard Tedious & Troblesome to have whroug\ht/ the same so neare by the Altitude: as I {illeg}|di|d there without it & by such a duble way of' working that no Less then 4 Hours Azim\{illeg}|u|th/ was shewed by the produce of' one simple multiplication casting away some five figures then Adding the Remainer To or Substrac\ting/ from a Nother constant given Summ: which is allwayes the same for ye Lat' & Hour given But for ye said tables he wrighteth that he doth not perceive but that they ar Sufficently Exact: Onley whether the Rule which I have computed the tables therby be Mathematically exact so yt with {sic} without Error danger of' error it may be used to Compute the Altitudes & Azimuths of' Stars which ar very Remoate from the pole I \he/ cannot tell that he wrighteth is onley to be knowne from the demonstration of' the Rule grounded on Mathematicall principles for wch I think this same of' myne is & if he receve my Letter dated \about/ Sept ye 4 or 5th: he will see by it a table of' the Sunn or Stars Hourly Azimuth for Every 4th degree of' the Sun{illeg}|s| \or Stars/ declination from ye Equinoctiall to 24degrs Eather north or South: wch declination\s/ is Remoat from ye pole wch I Calculated for ye Latitud of' 52degs=00min wch is shewed|th| very neare your Lat' at Cambridge Because he might the sooner Looke it over without troble any great troble for so it may chance yt he may have them Allreddye callculated for yt or your Lat' by him: But because I have beene at yt panes To make these tables universall being halfe Calculated for All Latitudes vizd: from ye Equinoctiall To ye Pole I shall Heare Lay downe the Grounds of' theare proportions of' the Sun\s/ or any Stars Hourly Azimuth

Latitude0000A Table shewing the Equinoctiall hours Tangent000of Azimuth from 50: to 55 degrees of Latitude yeLatitudeof50.51.5253.54.55. 11110293847566 0285870013267007660:04422002052000000.0 0290010013459007771:04486002082000000.0 02940800136480078800045490021120000000 0298050013832007986·04610002140000000.0 0301920014012008090004670002167000000.0 0305680014187008191:04729002194000000.0 The RadiusBeing100000000 A Table shewing the Roote of' hourly AzimuthBeing for the Tangent of  45degs  of Declination: yeLat'000050.51.52·53.54.55. 11110293847566 024836001285400908907421:006655:006428·0 024315001258500889907266:006516006293.·0 0237870012313008706007108:006375:0061570 023252001203600851106948:006231006018.0 022710:0011755008313006787·006085005878·0 022162001147100811206623005937005736·0

The use of' these Tables is thus for ye Sun or any Stars Hourly Azimuth for these Latitudes the Declination being given multiply the sum of' the Root of ye Hourly Azimuth, for ye Hour & Lat' suppoased: by the Tangent of the Sun or Stars declination: Cutt of foure figuers To ye Right hand from the product: The Remaner being added to or Substracted from the Equinoctiall hours Tangent of Azimuth: sheweth the Tangent of the hours Azimuth being counted from ye East or West. Example Lat' 52: the Declination 20degs North I demand the Azimuth at :10 in ye morning & :2: in the Affter noon: & at :6: in ye mor & 6 past {noo\ne/} at 2. in the morning & 10 at night at theese six hours I demand the Sun or Stars Azimuth: Aganst ye Lat' 52 under ye hour 102 I finde the sum of  ye  Roote of  yt  hour to be —12313: then the declination being  20degs=00   the Tangent thereof is —  3640  :by  wch  Tangent I multiply  ye  Roote by thus — 03640_4925207387800036939000_Rest.4481/9320 the Equinoctall  tangt  for  yt  hour & Lat' is —13648_ the produce of  ye  Roote of Azimuth is nearest —4482_ by  Substract  facit —9166_ by Adition facit —18130_ ye  12  of  ye  produce facit —2241_ /Three sums Heare I finded by Addition: Substr & 12 ye produce \12/ wch sums sheweth ye = sheweth the Tangt of 6 Hours Azimuth Thus{.}\

<3:1v>

First I finde by Substracting 4482: out of ye \ye Equ Tangt/ 13648 Rest 9166: wch sum is the Tangent of 42degs=31·m for ye Azimth: of .10: mor & .2: past noon{.} Secondly I finde by Adding of — 4482 To — 13648: facit 18130: wch Sum is the Tangent of 61degs=07min: for ye Azimth: at 2 in ye mor & at 10 at night{.} Lastly the halfe of — 4482 is — 2241: wch Sum is the Tangent of 12degs=38min: for ye Azimth: at 6 in ye mor & 6: past noone{.} Thus by this Rule you finde 6 Hours Azimuth p the produce of one small multiplication: shewd by Additio Subst & 12 the Sum{.} Againe I demand the Azimuth for theese 4 Hours of the day or night vizd for ye Hour of 9 in ye mor or 3 past noone, 9 at nigh or 3 in \mor/ The declinat 20degs, Lat' 52d=00´: the Roote of these hours Azimuth is —8706the Equinoct_  Tangt  for  yt  hour & Lat' is —7880being Multiplyed by the Tangent of  20degs  of declination  wch  is —003640_— facit nearest  3169.     .     .     .     .3169_348240facit by Substract_04711_5223600facit by Addition1104926118000_Rest3168/9840

Heare I finde by substracting 3169 out of 7880: Rest 4711 : wch is the Tangent of 25degs=13min: wch is ye Azimuth for 9 in ye mor or 3 past noon{.} But if I Add {illeg} 3169 to — 7880: facit 11049 wch sum is the Tangent of 47degs=51min wch is ye Azim at 3 in ye mor or 9 at night for North decli{.} But ye Contrary hours for South declination: thus you may doe for any of yt; said Latitudes to any Hour & declination{.}
To finde the Tangent of the Equinoctiall Hours Azimuth is Thus: Multiplye the Tangent of ye Hours distance from :6: by the Sine of ye Latitude Cut of 4 figures & ye Remaner is the Tangent of ye Azimuth: the Radius being 10000: To finde the Roote of Azimuth: or Tangent of 45degs of declination: Multiply ye Cosine of ye Latitude being doubled by the Secant of the hour Being counted from :6: Cutt of 4 figures to ye Right hand from the product; then ha{illeg}|l|fe the Remaner shall be the desired Sum for the Roote of ye Hours Azimuth: Now if you Add \or Substract/ this Root of ye Hours Azimuth To the Tangent{illeg} of the saide Equinoctiall \Hours/ Azimuth it will shew the Tangent of ye hours Azimuth for 45degs of Declination: Heare I have shewd|e|d the proportions by wch I Calculated the Sun' & The North Star's Hourly Azimuth wch I would have done when I sent Mr Newton my Last Table of ye Sun's Hourly Azimuth wch I could not then doe by Reason of ye shortness of my Time: Therefore I would Intreat your favour if yt you pleace d|T|o do me that kindness once moore as to lett \desire/ him to Looke over theese proportions To see whether they hold Good yea or not for I have bestoed so much paines wth them{.} In the Same Manner as I have shewed you by the Tables Heare \made/ universall: Tables for All Latitudes vizd from ye Equinoctiall to ye Pole{.} Therefore if Mr Newton could doe me yt faivour as to Resolve me of wch in 6 or 8 dayes affter the dait of this He would much Oblidge me thereby: Haveing no moore at prsent But Returning you many thanc{illeg}|k|s for your Trouble & Great G kindeness at Boothby & Elcewhear with my True Love & Service To Mr Newton Returning him many thancks for his kindeness I Rest at yor Command your Nepheu to Seve you Arthur Storer

London Sept 19th: 1678



Thanckes be to God All wth us heare ar very well: \hopeing ye like wth you{.}/ I was wth Coz Wm King this day who is very well & I hope will do well{.} Both hee & Shee mindes there buisness very Cloacely & I hope yt he will have a very great helpe by her Especially in the Consernes of his trayde he imployeth a boy aprentice & a Jorneyman: All of wch I finde usally very hard at worke{.}

<3:2v>

For the Reverend Doct Humphry
Babington at Trenitye Colidge
In Cambridge
{4}

© 2024 The Newton Project

Professor Rob Iliffe
Director, AHRC Newton Papers Project

Scott Mandelbrote,
Fellow & Perne librarian, Peterhouse, Cambridge

Faculty of History, George Street, Oxford, OX1 2RL - newtonproject@history.ox.ac.uk

Privacy Statement

  • University of Oxford
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council
  • JISC