July 16th 1670.

{illeg}|W|orthy Sr

I sometimes thought to have altered & enlarged Kinkhuysed|n| his discourse upon surds but judging those examples I added would in some measure supply his defects I contented my selfe wth doing that onely. But since you would have it more fully done, if the booke goe not immediately into ye presse I desire you'le send it back wth those notes I have made (since you are resolved to print them also) & I will doe something more to it or if you please to send all but the first sheete or two, while yt other is {illeg}|in| the press \is printing/, Ile reveiw the rest & not only supply ye wants about surds but that about Æquations soluble by trisection, & somthing more I would say in the chapter [Quomodò quæstio aliqua ad æquationem redigatur.] that being the most requisite & desirable doct{illeg}|r|ine to a Tyro & scarce touched upon by any writer unles in generall circumstances bidding them onely Nota ab ignotis non discernere & adhibere debitum ratiocionium.

As to Fergusons rendering the roots of Æquations soluble by trisection, his defect will appeare by example. Let us take his 2d x3=6x+4, in pag 12. In order to solve this hee bidds extract ye cubick root of these binomiums 2+4, & 24 To doe this his rule pag 4 is: " Multiply ye binomium by 1000, put in pure numbers &c: Now 2+4in1000 makes 2000+4000000, but to put this in pure numbers is impossible for 4000000 is an impossibe|l|e quantity & hath noe pure number answering to it. \His rule therefore failes &/ The like difficulty is in his 3d example & in all other such cases. In generall I see not wt hee hath done more then in Cardans rules. For in this instance Cardans rule will give you x==c:2+4+c:24. in wch ye only difficulty as before is to extract ye rootes of ye binomiums 2+4 & 24. Which roots indeed are 1+1 & 11, as he assignes them, but tells not how to extract them. Nor doe I see wt hee hath done more then Descartes in his Solution of biquadratick Equations: for both goe ye same way to worke in reducing them first to Cubick & then to quadratick æquation. Lastly I see not in what case his rules will render ro|th|e roots of cubick or biquadratick Æquations in proprio genere where those of Cardan or Descartes will not. But in hast I must take my leave remaining

Yor most obliged srvant

I. Newton

< insertion from lower down the page >

I thank you for yor two last bookes.

< text from f 8r resumes >

|Mr Newton about Fergusons Booke|


To Mr John Collins at
his house neare the three Crownes
in Bloomsbury in



© 2024 The Newton Project

Professor Rob Iliffe
Director, AHRC Newton Papers Project

Scott Mandelbrote,
Fellow & Perne librarian, Peterhouse, Cambridge

Faculty of History, George Street, Oxford, OX1 2RL - newtonproject@history.ox.ac.uk

Privacy Statement

  • University of Oxford
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council
  • JISC