<262r>

To the Rt Honble the Lords Commrs of his Majts Treary

May it please yor Lordps

In obedience to yor Lordps Order of \Reference of/ May 11th instant He \& Iames\Tho/ Hamilton/ left Scotland on Feb 18th 17167 & \he/ gave in the Report to yor Lops 71 d concerning the Mine 71 days after viz on May\April/ 1|2|9th 1717. And when he gave in his Account to yor Lordps wch was on May 17th following he demanded 20s per diem for those 71 days\for him {illeg} {illeg}|{pai}|d {illeg}|14|d per diem for Hamilton./ But it was not allowed him the Princes Warrant limiting that allowance to the time of his stay in Scotland upon the {illeg}|s|ervice of the Mint. He received therefore only 214li And when I paid him the last part of this summ, \wch was Aug. 26 1717,/ he gave a receipt in full of all accounts.

The 71li set down by Mr Brandshagen in the first of the three Articles annexed to Mr Walkers Petition & \as due to them, was \therefore/ not due to him. And the same is to be understood of/ the 35li 10s set down in the second Article as due him, were not from the Crown, were no{illeg}|t| due to him. And\to Tho Hamilton./ The 6li 18s in the third Article should be 6li 8s, & this summ hath been already paid to him \Dr Brandshagen/ & I know of nothing more due {illeg}|to| |t|hi|e|m from the Crown{sic} |then what they have already received & given Receipts for in full of all demands\their accounts/.|

All wch

© 2024 The Newton Project

Professor Rob Iliffe
Director, AHRC Newton Papers Project

Scott Mandelbrote,
Fellow & Perne librarian, Peterhouse, Cambridge

Faculty of History, George Street, Oxford, OX1 2RL - newtonproject@history.ox.ac.uk

Privacy Statement

  • University of Oxford
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council
  • JISC