<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:np="http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/ns/nonTEI" xml:id="MINT01898" type="transcription">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>Holograph draft of <ref target="/catalogue/record/MINT00173">MINT00173</ref> (Mint 19/1/109)</title>
                <author xml:id="in"><persName key="nameid_1" sort="Newton, Isaac" ref="nameid_1" xml:base="http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/catalogue/xml/persNames.xml">Isaac Newton</persName></author>
                
            </titleStmt>
<extent><hi rend="italic">c.</hi> <num n="word_count" value="1470">1,470</num> words</extent>
            <publicationStmt>
                <authority>The Newton Project</authority>
                <pubPlace>Oxford</pubPlace>
                <date>2017</date>
                <publisher>Newton Project, University of Oxford</publisher>
                <availability n="lic-text" status="restricted"><licence target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><p>This text is licensed under a <ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License</ref>.</p></licence></availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <notesStmt>
<note type="metadataLine">After 21 August 1710, <hi rend="italic">c.</hi> 1,470 words.</note>
                <note n="scopecontent">
                    <p>Recommends the use of antimony as the best way of refining gold, 'But the Refiners of this city know not how to Refine gold by Antimony'.</p>
                </note>
                <note n="related_texts">
                    <linkGrp n="document_relations" xml:base="http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/view/normalized/"><ptr type="is_version_of" target="MINT00173">Memorandum by Newton: 'Of the assaying of Gold and Silver, the making of indented Triall-pieces and trying the moneys in the Pix' [MINT 19/1/109]</ptr></linkGrp>
                </note>
            </notesStmt>
            <sourceDesc><bibl type="simple" n="custodian_27" sortKey="mint_19/01/291-2" subtype="Manuscript">MINT 19/1/291-2, National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK</bibl>
                <msDesc>
                    <msIdentifier>
                        <country>UK</country><region>Surrey</region><settlement>Kew, Richmond</settlement><repository n="custodian_27">National Archives</repository>
                        <idno n="MINT 19/01/291-2">MINT 19/1/291-2</idno>
                    </msIdentifier>
                </msDesc></sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <profileDesc>
            <creation>
                <origDate when="1710-08-21">After 21 August 1710</origDate>
                <origPlace>England</origPlace>
            </creation>
            <langUsage>
                <language ident="eng">English</language>
            </langUsage>
            <handNotes>
                <handNote sameAs="#in">Holograph</handNote>
            </handNotes>
        </profileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <classDecl><taxonomy><category><catDesc n="Mint">Mint</catDesc><category><catDesc n="PyxTrialsAndAnalysesOfBritishCoinage">Pyx Trials and Analyses of British Coinage</catDesc></category></category></taxonomy></classDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
        <revisionDesc>
            <change when="2001-01-01" type="metadata">Catalogue information compiled by Rob Iliffe, Peter Spargo &amp; John Young</change>
            <change when="2011-09-29" type="metadata">Catalogue exported to teiHeader by <name xml:id="mjh">Michael Hawkins</name></change>
            <change when="2017-01-23">Transcribed by <name>Will Scott</name></change>
        </revisionDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <div xml:lang="eng">
                
                <pb xml:id="p291r" n="291r"/>
                
                <p rend="center" xml:id="par1"><hi rend="large">Of the fabrication &amp; triall of the moneys of Gold <lb xml:id="l1"/>&amp; silver by the assay.</hi> <space dim="vertical" unit="lines" extent="2"/></p>
                
                <p xml:id="par2">Assaying &amp; refining are operations of the same kind. The Assayer <lb xml:id="l2"/>refines a small piece of any mass of gold or silver &amp; by the decrease of <lb xml:id="l3"/>its weight makes his report. And if there be no decrease, that is, if the <lb xml:id="l4"/>mass be of the same fineness with the refined Assay-piece, he reports <lb xml:id="l5"/>(or ought to  report) it two carats better then standard, or twenty &amp; <lb xml:id="l6"/>four carats fine: &amp; this <add place="supralinear" indicator="no">is</add> fine gold in the sense of the Law. The Assay-<lb xml:id="l7"/>piece therefore when the Assayer works exactly becomes fine gold or <lb xml:id="l8"/>fine silver in the sense of the Law. And all gold &amp; silver in the <lb xml:id="l9"/>sense of the law is fine gold &amp; fine silver if it be of the same <lb xml:id="l10"/>fineness <choice><abbr>w<hi rend="superscript">th</hi></abbr><expan>with</expan></choice> the Assay-piece. And because the Assayer works more <lb xml:id="l11"/>exactly to a rule then the Refiner, &amp; makes better dispatch, the Assay <lb xml:id="l12"/>is made the standing universal  Rule of  valuing gold &amp; silver in <lb xml:id="l13"/>all nations in point of fineness, &amp; the Law in ordeining that <lb xml:id="l14"/>standard Gold shall be 22 carats fine &amp; standard silver 11 ounces <lb xml:id="l15"/><del type="strikethrough">fine</del> two  penny weight fine, means by the Assay.</p>
                
                <p xml:id="par3">The assays of gold ought to be made with two waters &amp; no <lb xml:id="l16"/>more, this being the constant practise of assaying; &amp; the waters <lb xml:id="l17"/>ought to be of <del type="over">an</del><add place="over" indicator="no">th</add><add place="inline" indicator="no">e</add> <del type="strikethrough">ordinary</del><add place="supralinear" indicator="no">usual</add> strength  (the second water stronger then <lb xml:id="l18"/>the first) &amp; to work the usual time &amp; in the  usual heat, &amp; the assay piece <lb xml:id="l19"/>ought to be hammered to the usual thinness  that the Assays may be <lb xml:id="l20"/>uniform. And the assays of silver ought to be made  with a due pro<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l21"/>portion of lead in a due &amp; eaven heat, &amp; as soon as the lead is <lb xml:id="l22"/>blown off &amp; the silver looks bright &amp; glittering, the silver must begin <lb xml:id="l23"/>to cool  without roasting it, &amp; it must cool slowly that it do not <lb xml:id="l24"/>spring. But in refining  gold &amp; silver in great quantities these niceties are not <lb xml:id="l25"/>observed.</p>
                
                <p xml:id="par4">Refiners find it difficult to refine gold to the degree of 24 carats. <lb xml:id="l26"/>They  seldome make it above 23 carats 3 grains &amp; 3 quarters <del type="cancelled">fine</del> of a <lb xml:id="l27"/>grain fine, &amp; by fine gold generally understand  gold of this degree of <lb xml:id="l28"/>fineness. And if gold at any time prove finer upon the Assay, Assayers <lb xml:id="l29"/>out of prejudice do not report it finer. And thence it comes  to pass <lb xml:id="l30"/>that the Goldsmiths are generally of opinion that Gold cannot be <lb xml:id="l31"/>made above 24  carats fine. But if when they have watered their <lb xml:id="l32"/>granulated gold once or twice with Aqua fortis, they should dulcify it &amp; <lb xml:id="l33"/>grind it very fine as painters do their colours, &amp; then water it once <lb xml:id="l34"/>or twice more with double Aqua fortis in the same degree of heat <lb xml:id="l35"/>as before &amp; keep it longer in the water then before stirring it now &amp; <lb xml:id="l36"/>then with a wooden stick to make the gold mix <choice><abbr>w<hi rend="superscript">th</hi></abbr><expan>with</expan></choice> fresh water: <lb xml:id="l37"/>the gold would become finer then <del type="cancelled">before</del> by the Assay, &amp; by conse<del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="2"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">qu</add>ence <lb xml:id="l38"/>finer then four &amp; twenty carats. Chymists also tell us that Gold may <lb xml:id="l39"/>be made finer by Antimony then by Aqua fortis &amp; by consequence <lb xml:id="l40"/>then by the Assay; &amp; Gold refined by Antimony is of a better 
                    
                    <fw type="catch" place="bottomRight">colo<supplied reason="damage">ur</supplied></fw><pb xml:id="p291v" n="291v"/>
                    
                    colour then Gold refined by Aqua fortis, &amp; by reason of its fineness will go <lb xml:id="l41"/>much further in gilding, as I have heard. But the Refiners of this city know <lb xml:id="l42"/>not how to refine gold by Antimony. And so silver also by being tested <choice><abbr>w<hi rend="superscript">th</hi></abbr><expan>with</expan></choice> <lb xml:id="l43"/>more lead &amp; roasted becomes finer then by the common way of assaying, but <lb xml:id="l44"/>not <del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">a</add> half-penny weight finer.</p>
                
                <p xml:id="par5">If Refiners should work perfectly in the same manner with Assayers <lb xml:id="l45"/>that is, if they should mix gold with silver in the same proportion &amp; drive <lb xml:id="l46"/>it off the test with the same proportion of lead &amp; ha<del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">m</add>mer it to the same <lb xml:id="l47"/>thinness &amp; water it with waters of the same strength in the same degree <lb xml:id="l48"/>of heat during the same length of time, their gold would become just <lb xml:id="l49"/>24 carats fine. And by imitating the Assayer their silver would become <lb xml:id="l50"/>twelve ounces fine. But they work not with so much curiosity &amp; exact<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l51"/>ness. Their fine gold &amp; fine silver must be assayed to know the just degree of <lb xml:id="l52"/>fineness.</p>
                
                <p xml:id="par6"><del type="blockStrikethrough">The standard Trial pieces re made by the assay, &amp; will a<del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">l</add>ways <lb xml:id="l53"/>agree with the assay if they be rightly made. But if a competent number <lb xml:id="l54"/>of assays of the Trial piece agree with one another with<del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">o</add>ut any <lb xml:id="l55"/>material difference, &amp; at a medium are standard, the Trial piece is <lb xml:id="l56"/>standar<supplied reason="damage">d.</supplied></del></p>
                
                <p xml:id="par7">Assays are liable to errors, but the errors are generally very small <lb xml:id="l57"/>&amp; seldome exceed a quarter of a grain in gold &amp; an halfpenny weight in  <lb xml:id="l58"/>silver. And by reason of these little errors the Assayer in single Assays <lb xml:id="l59"/>makes  his report<add place="inline" indicator="no">s</add> to no less parts then a quarter of a grain in gold &amp; a <lb xml:id="l60"/>half penny weight  in silver. But if two or more Assays be made of the <lb xml:id="l61"/>same piece of gold or of  the same piece of silver, &amp; the assays <del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">a</add>gree <lb xml:id="l62"/>without any considerable difference,  &amp; a medium be taken between <lb xml:id="l63"/>them: the fineness of the gold may be <del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">d</add>etermined to less then half a <lb xml:id="l64"/>quarter of a grain <del type="strikethrough">in gold &amp;</del> <add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">&amp; the fineness of the silver to <del type="over"><unclear reason="del" cert="low">be</unclear></del><add place="over" indicator="no">le</add>ss then an</add> half a halfpenny weight<add place="inline" indicator="no">.</add> <del type="strikethrough">in silver.</del> <add place="lineEnd" indicator="no">And</add> <lb xml:id="l65"/><del type="over">T</del><add place="over" indicator="no">t</add>his is the exactest way of assaying hitherto in use</p>
                
                <p xml:id="par8">The standard Trial pieces are made by the Assay. First the Iury <lb xml:id="l66"/>procures gold &amp; silver <del type="strikethrough">of</del> <add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">refined by</add> the Refiner, &amp; assays them to see if they be <del type="cancelled">standard</del> <lb xml:id="l67"/>of a just degree of fineness, that  is, the gold just 24 carats fine &amp; the silver <lb xml:id="l68"/>just 12 ounces fine. Then they melt this gold &amp; silver severally with <lb xml:id="l69"/>allay in due proportion, &amp; stir them well together in fusion several times <lb xml:id="l70"/>to mix them <add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">very</add> well, &amp; pour  them off before the allay evaporates, &amp;  assay <lb xml:id="l71"/>them several times to  see if they be standard, taking assays fr<del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">o</add>m several <lb xml:id="l72"/>places to see if the mixture  be uniform. They must agree therefore with <lb xml:id="l73"/>the assay as exactly as is possible least there be two standards, one by the <lb xml:id="l74"/>Assay-weights the other by the Trial-piece</p>
                
                <p xml:id="par9">The trial of the moneys in the Pix is to be performed after the most <lb xml:id="l75"/>just manner that can be made by fire by water by touch  or by weight <lb xml:id="l76"/>or by all or by any of them, as is exprest in the Indenture of <add place="inline" indicator="no">th</add><del type="over"><unclear reason="del" cert="low">a</unclear></del><add place="over" indicator="no">e</add> Mint. <lb xml:id="l77"/>If the Trial piece be exactly made, the trial thereby is the most <lb xml:id="l78"/>expedite &amp; the least liable to errors. But a Trial piece may happen to <lb xml:id="l79"/>be erroneus, &amp; then the other ways of assaying, as they are lawfull so <lb xml:id="l80"/>they  may be also usefull. For the Ass<del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">a</add>y by the Assay-weights exactly <lb xml:id="l81"/>made will  discover the error of the Trial piece if <choice><sic>their</sic><corr>there</corr></choice> be any &amp; how <lb xml:id="l82"/>great that error is; &amp; the Assay by the touch being very easy may be <lb xml:id="l83"/>also used to see how it agrees with the  other Assays, but it is less <lb xml:id="l84"/>exact &amp; not to be depended upon alone.</p>
                
                <p rend="indent10" xml:id="par10"><hi rend="large">The present case</hi></p>
                
                <p xml:id="par11">At the last trial of the Pix the Iury by the Assay found that <lb xml:id="l85"/>the money was standard full &amp; the Triall piece a quarter of a grain <lb xml:id="l86"/>better then the money, &amp; the Iury in their Veredict that the money was <lb xml:id="l87"/><supplied reason="foxed">a</supplied> quarter of a grain  worse then standard by the <del type="cancelled">stand</del> Trial piece. The 
                    
                    <fw type="catch" place="bottomRight">Veredict</fw><pb xml:id="p292r" n="292r"/>
                    
                    Veredict imployed that the Trial-piece was standard &amp; the money <lb xml:id="l88"/>a quarter of a grain wors then standard, tho the Iury found by <lb xml:id="l89"/>the Trial that the money was standard &amp; the Trial piece a <lb xml:id="l90"/>quarter of a grain better then standard. By my assays this <lb xml:id="l91"/>Trial piece is five twelft parts of a grain better then standard, <lb xml:id="l92"/>that of 1688 is the sixt part of a grain better, that of 1660 <lb xml:id="l93"/>is standard <space dim="vertical" unit="lines" extent="1"/></p>
                
                <p rend="indent15" xml:id="par12">Quære <space dim="vertical" unit="lines" extent="1"/></p>
                
                <p xml:id="par13">If upon any triall of the Pix the Trial piece prove better <lb xml:id="l94"/>or worse then standard, are not the Iury to ascertain &amp; report <lb xml:id="l95"/>the error, &amp; may not the Master of the Mint by an Order of <lb xml:id="l96"/>Council allow for that error in coyning the money by that <lb xml:id="l97"/>Trial piece for the future without putting the Government <lb xml:id="l98"/>to the trouble &amp; charge of making a new one? Or must <lb xml:id="l99"/>a new Trial-piece be made; or the money continue to be <lb xml:id="l100"/>coyned &amp; tried by a false Trial piece without inquiring into the <lb xml:id="l101"/>error; &amp; so the Company of Goldsmiths have it in their power <lb xml:id="l102"/>without controll, to alter the standard as often as they are to <lb xml:id="l103"/>make a new standard Triall-piece?</p>
            
            </div>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>