<12r>

Cambridg. Jan. 6. 16712.

Sr

At the reading of yor letter I was surprised to see so much care taken about securing an invention to mee, of wch I have hitherto had so little value. And therefore since the R. Society is pleased to think it worth the patronizing, I must acknowledg it deserves much more of them for that, then of mee, who, had not the communication of it been desired, might have let it still remained in private as it hath already done some yeares.

|—[|The description of ye instrument you sent mee is very well, onely the radius of the concave metall wch you put 14inches is more justly 1223 or 13inches, & the radius of ye eye glasse wch you put half an inch is the twelft part of it, if not lesse. For ye metall collects ye suns rays at 613inches distance, & ye distance of eye glass at lesse then 16t pt of an inch distance from its vertex. By the tooles also to wch they were ground I know their dimensions, & particularly measuring the diameter of the diameter of the hemisphæricall concave in wch ye eye glasse was ground I find it the 6t part of an inch.

Perhaps it may give some satisfaction to Mounsieur Hugens to understand in wt degree it represents things distinct & free from colours, & to know the aperture by wch it admits light. And after the words [— versus focum E reflectatur.] it may not bee amiss to add this note

Conferendo distantias foci istius a verticibus Lentis et speculi concavi, hoc est EF16dig et ETU613dig, prodit ratio 1 ad 38, qua indicatur objecta 38 vicibus circiter ampliari.

And to this proportion is very consentaneous ye observation of the crowns on the weathercock. For the scheme represents it bigger by 212 times when seene through this, then when through an ordinary perspective. And so supposing that to magnify 13 or 14 times, as by the description it should, this by the experiment proportionably must magnify almost as much as I have assigned it. ||

To the objection that wth it objects are difficultly found, I may answer that that's {illeg}|t|he inconvenience of all Tubes that magnify much, & that after a little use the inconvenience will grow lesse, For I could readily enough find any day objects by knowing wch way they were posited from other objects that I accidentally saw in it; but in the night to find starrs I confesse is troublesom enough. Yet this may bee easily remedyed by two sights affixed to ye iron rodd by wch the tube is susteined. And such I once intended should have beene made before I sent it away from mee, but that I thought the defect would not bee judged materiall. If such sights bee not found a sufficient remedy, there may bee an ordinary perspective glasse fastened to ye same frame wth ye tube, & directed towards the same object, as D-Cartes in his Dioptricks hath described for remedying the same inconvenience of his best telescopes.

The plane side of the eye glasse is apt to bee soiled wth dust falling upon it. And therefore the little leaden ring put into ye orifice of the bigger leaden barrell to moderate its aperture must bee sometimes taken out, & the glass wiped wth leather done upon the small end of a stick, or other such like contrivance, but care must bee taken that the said ring bee not lost, for wthout it objects appeare very confused at the edges of ye apparent space. So if the concave metall contract any dullnesse by moysture or otherwise, it ought to bee taken out and rubbed wth gentle leather, but not wth putty or any thing that may weare the metall.

I am very sensible of the honour done me by ye Bp of Sarum in proposing mee < insertion from the left margin > Candi{illeg}|d|ate & wch I hope will bee further conferred upon mee by my Election into the Society. And if so, I shall endeavour to testify my gratitude by communicating what my poore & solitary endeavours can effect towards ye promoting yor Philosophicall designes. Sr I am

Yor very humble servant

I. Newton.

< text from f 12r resumes >

© 2017 The Newton Project

Professor Rob Iliffe
Director, AHRC Newton Papers Project

Scott Mandelbrote,
Fellow & Perne librarian, Peterhouse, Cambridge

Faculty of History, George Street, Oxford, OX1 2RL - newtonproject@history.ox.ac.uk

Privacy Statement

  • University of Oxford
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council
  • JISC