<231r>

When I made the foregoing Observations, I designed to repeat most of them with more care & exactness, & to make some new ones for determining the manner how the rays of light are bent in their passage by bodies, for making the fringes of colours wth the dark lines between them. But I was then interrupted, & cannot now think of taking these things into further consideration. And since I have not finished this part of my designe, I shall conclude, with proposing only some Quæres in order to a further search to be made by others.

Quære 1. Do not Bodies act upon light at a distance & by their action bend its rays & is not this action (cæteris paribus) strongest at the least distance?

Qu. 2. Do not the rays wch differ in refrangibility differ also in flexibility & are they not by their different inflexions separated from one another so as after separation to make the colours in the three fringes [above described? And after what manner are they inflected to make those fringes?

Qu. 3. Are not the rays of Light in passing by the edges & sides of bodies bent {illeg}ned several times backwards & forwards with a motion like that of an Eele? |And do not the three fringes \of coloured light above mentioned/ arise from three such bendings?|

Qu. 4. Do not the rays of Light {illeg} wch fall upon bodies & are reflected or refracted, begin to bend before they arrive at the bodies; & are they not reflected refracted & inflected by one & the same Principle acting variously in various circumstances?

Qu. 5. Do not b|B|odies & Light act mutually upon one another, that is to say, Bodies upon Light in emitting, reflecting, & refracting & inflecting it, and Light upon bodies for heating them & putting their parts into a <232r> vibrating motion wherein heat consists?

Qu. 6. Do not black bodies conceive heat more easily from light then those of other colours do, by reason that the light falling on them is not reflected outwards but enters the bodies & is often reflected & refracted within them untill it be stifled & lost?

Qu. 7. Is not the strength & vigor of the action between Light & sulphureous Bodies observed above, one reason why sulphureous bodies take fire more readily & burn more vehemently then other Bodies do?

Qu. 8. Do not all fixt bodies when heated beyond a certain degree, emit light \& shine, & is not this emission performed/ by the vibrating motions of their parts?

[Qu. 9. Is not fire a body heated so hot as to emit Light copiously? For what else is a red hot Iron then fire, & what else is a burning coale then red hot wood?

Qu. 10. Is not flame a vapour, fume or exhalation heated red hot, that is so hot as to shine? For Bodies do not flame without emitting a copious fume, & this fume burns in the flame. \ The Ignis fatuus –/ < insertion from f 231v > ✝ The Ignis fatuus is a vapour shining without heat, & is there not the same difference between this vapour & flame as between rotten wood shining without heat & burning coales of fire? In destilling hot spirits if ye head of the still be taken off the vapour wch ascends out of the still will take fire at the flame of a candle & turn into flame & the flame will run along ye candle from \vapor from the candle to/ the Still. \Some/ Bodies heated by motion or fermentation if the heat grow intense fume copiously, & if the heat be great enough |the fume| will shine & become flame. Metals in fusion do not flame for want of a copious fume except Spelter wch fumes copiously & thereby flames. All flaming bodies as oyle, tallow, wax, wood, fossil coales, pitch, sulphur, by flaming wast & vanish into burning smo{illeg}ke, wch smoke if the flame be put out is very thick & visible & sometimes smells strongly but in the flame loses its smell by burning, & according to ye nature of the smoke the flame is of several colours, as that of sulphur blue, that of Copper opened with A{illeg} Sublimate green, that of tallow yellow. Smoke passing through flame cannot but grow red hot & red hot smoke can have no other appearance then that of flame.

Qu. 11. \Do not great bodies conserve their heat the longest their parts heating one another, &/ May not \great/ dense & fixt bodies when heated beyond a certain degree emit light so copiously as by the emission & reaction of its light & the reflexions & refractions of it's rays within its pores to grow still hotter till it comes to a certain period of heat, such as is \such as is l{illeg}/ that of the Sun. And are not the Sun & Fixt Stars great Earths vhemently {sic} hot, whose heat — — — < text from f 232r resumes > Qu. 11. Are not the Sun & fixt Stars great Earths vehemently hot, whose heat {sic} is conserved by the \greatness of the bodies and the/ mutual action & reaction between them & the Light wch they emit, & whose parts are kept from fuming away not only by their fixity but also by the vast weight \& density/ of the Atmospheres incumbent upon them {illeg} /& \very/ strongly compressing them & condensing the vapours & exhalations wch arise from them.\

Qu. 12. Do not the rays of light in falling upon the bottom of the eye exct|i|te vibrations in the Tunica Retina? wch vibrations being propagated along the solid fibres of the Optic nerves into the Brain cause the sense of seeing? For because dense bodies conserve their heat a long time & the densest bodies conserve their heat the longest, the vibrations of their parts are of a lasting nature & therefore may be propagated along the solid fibres of uniform dense matter to a great distance for conveying into the brain the impressions made upon all the Organs of sense. For that motion wch can continue long in one & the same part of a body can be propagated a long <233r> way from one part to another, supposing the Body homogeneal so that the motion may not be reflected, refracted interrupted or disordered by any uneavenness of ye body.

[Qu. 13. Do not several sorts of rays make vibrations of several bignesses wch according to their bignesses excite sensations of several colours much after the manner that the vibrations of the air according to their several bignesses excite sensations of several sounds? And particularly do not the most refrangible rays excite the shortest vibrations for making a sensation of deep violet, the least refrangible the largest for making a sensation of deep red, & the several intermediate sorts of rays, vibrations of several intermedit|a|te bignesses to make vibra \sensa/tions of the several intermediate colours?

Qu. 14. May not the harmony & discord of colours arise from the proportions of the vibrations propagated through the fibres of the Optick nerves into the brain, as the harmony & discord of sounds arises from the proportions of the vibrations of ye Air. For some colours are agreable as those of g|G|old & Indigo, & others disagree.

Qu. 15. Are not the species of o|O|bjects seen with both eyes united where the Optick nerves meet before they come into the brain, the fibres on the right side of both Nerves uniting there & after union going thence into the brain in the Nerve which is on the right side of the head & the fibres on the left side of both Nerves uniting in the same place & after union going into the brain in the Nerve wch is on the left side of the head & these two Nerves meeting in the brain in such a manner that their fibres make but one entire species or picture, half of wch on ye right side of the sensorium comes from the right side of both eyes through the right side of [both Optick Nerves to the place where the Nerves meet & from thence on the right side of the head into the brain, & the other half on the left side of the sensorium comes in like manner from the left side of both eyes. For the Optick Nerves of such animals as look the same way with both eyes (as of Men, Dogs, Sheep, Oxen &c.)

<234r>

Qu.16. Are not \Is not the free passage of {l} light through pellucid bodies an argument that all/ all {sic} pell bodies \are/ very porous|.| for giving passage to ye rays of light? {illeg} that Water is nineteen times lighter in specie then Gold & therefore would be since |the| gravity of since the matter in bodies is proportional to their gravity water would have eighteen times more pores then parts of gold were {sol} \perfectly solid or/ void of all pores. But gold is also very porous as appears by the soaking of quicksilver into it & & \by/ \the squeezing of water through it & principally/ by the passage of light through its particles when dissolved foliated or dissolved in Aqua regia. Were the pores of gold but equal to its parts the pores of rain water would be \contain/ 37 time mo|s| more \space{illeg}/ then its parts. And he that shall invent a sound rational Hypothesis for explaining how water can be so porous & yet be uncapable of compression \by force/, may by doubtless by the same Hypothesis explain how gold may have 3 above 37 time be as porous as he pleases & \all/ other bodies as much more porous then gold as they are lighter in specie. Suppose a body \be were/ composed of parts lying together with as much pore|s| between them, & that these parts are \were/ composed of smaller parts \lying toh|g|ether/ with as much pores between them & that these parts be \were/ composed of parts still smaller with as much pores between them & so on for as many compositions as you please {illeg} untill you come at solid parts void of all pores. And if in this progression there be \were/ ten compositions, {illeg} the body will \would/ have 1023 |above a thousand times| more pores then parts; if twenty compositions, it will|ou|ld have above a thousand thousand times more pores then parts; if thirty compositions, it will \would/ have above a thousand thousand thousand thousand times more pores then parts & so on perpetually. Certainly the passa But whatever be the texture of bodies, they must be so porous as \in all positions/ to give passage to ye rays of light in right lines through their pores. For whatever \the rays of/ light be whether its rays \they/ consist in the vibrations of a medium, or be bodies trajected, if {illeg} in passing through the pores of pellucid bodies they do not find room enough to go on in right lines they must be turned whenever they are once turned disturbed & turned out of their direct courses, they will go on in their new courses till they are disturbed again, & they more they are disturbed the more they will err & never return no more to their first courses unless by \very/ great accident. To suppose that light as of often as ye rays of light are turned out of their way by some parts of ye bodies, they will be turned into way again by others is as precarious & extravagant as to suppose that sound can pass through a forest of trees without they \the suns light can pass/ can pass through a heap of sand & \after many reflexions/ emerge in the same right lines as often in wch they \it/ came from ye sun, some {illeg} the sands being so disposed that some {illeg} reflexions \shall/ turn ye rays into their right course as often as others turn them out of their way. The |great| porousness \& admirable structure/ of bodies is further argued from the lastingness of the vibrating motions of their parts wherein heat consists, & from the great capacity of one & the same matter by corruption & generation to put off & put on all manner of forms. For as the For whilst For without \great/ porousness \the parts of/ bodies could no more vibrate then a stone \spring/ can tremble in the middst of a heap of sand. It is further argu And it may be further argued from the great capacity of one & the same matter by corruption & generation to put off & put on all manner of forms, For & be changed into all sorts of shapes. C The contrivance of the bodies of living creatures is admirable. Not a member but has its use & is mighty well fitted for that use. And \since the forms & uses of matter are infinite/ can we beleive that he who contrived ye bodies of animals wth so much artifice {illeg} was not as skilful & curious in the contrivance of matter contriving the \its the/ texture of matter so as to fit it make it capable by {corruption} of all manner of forms & uses \uses {sic}/ applicab \of matter for those/ ends for which it is fitted. For the forms & uses of matter are infinite \innumerable/ & therefore <234v> we are not to consider it as {illeg}composed of partic irregular particles irregularly \casually/ laid together like stones in a heap, but as formed wisely for all those uses. One use \of matter/ is that to admit menstruums easily into its pores for in order to \new mixtures {illeg} by & actions by fermentation putrefaction/ corruption & generation, another to conceive heat easily & keep it long for promoting changes by corruption \fermentation putrefaction/ & generation, a those to transmit light for refract & reflect light for producing all the phænomena of colours. A fourth of bodies wthout wch where in the beauty of nature mightily \chiefly/ consists. Without these uses matter \the earth/ would have been a dead lump void of without \void of/ heat & motion & generation \& alteration/ & variety of colours: & therefore it is reasonable to allow that he who contrived all things \with wisdome/, framed matter in such a manner as to fit it best for these uses, & by consequence made it very porous.

Qu. 17 Is there not something in|di|ffused through all space in & through wch bodies move without resistance & by means of wch they act upon one another at a distance in harmonical propos|r|tions of their distances.

Qu. 8. — — — And do not all bodies wch abound wth sulphureous parts when those \or terrestrial parts emit light/ |whenever those| parts are sufficiently agitated by putrefaction heat putrefaction attrition \percussion/ putrefaction or any other cause emit light? 1 So the waves of ye salt water of the sea in a storm by dashing against one another emit light, 5 \the shavings/ of steel being struck \scraped of by a stroke/ wth a flint melt by the grow hot & melt \by the action/ & shine like sparks of fire by the action. 3 The back of a c|C|at being struck obliquely with ones hand emits a faint light in a dark room. \6 Iron may be hammered till it grows red hot / 7 The wheel of a cart or chariot by \vehement/ attrition sometimes heats the axes so to great a grea degree as to set it on flame |7 Moist stacks of hay or corn by fermentation & putrefaction grow hot till they emit a shining flame.| 2 Quicksilver by any vehement agitation in vacuo shines with a faint light th{illeg} \&/ so does rotting wood & rotting flesh or fish tho all the parts of the body be not agitatted so vehemently as to make the body sensibly warm. But wthout motion no bodies emit light \And so do the putrid vapours called Ignes fatui/ 4 One sort of Phosphorus by {illeg} being placed some time in the Suns light conceives an an {sic} agitation by wch it shines for some after in the dark: another sort by the access of fresh air is easily put into motion emits a copious fume wth a sulphureous smell & shines & by rubbing it quietly \grows hot &/ takes flame. But without motion no bodies emit light \Some liquors by mixing with one another/ grow hot & some grow so hot as to emit a shining vapour or flame.

sed quo ipsœ nos latent, et ex hoc nomine \quaetatibus specificis/ causes Phænomenon imposit nondum patentibus imposito deterremar ab {illeg} a causis hisce indagandis, quasi quidem illæ penitus essent deploratæ postquam magnus ipse Philosophus Aristoteles in eas penetrare non potuerat. Gravitas igitu sic \Hoc sensu/ gravitas dicend \est/ erit qualitas manifesto, et causa \sola/ gravitatis \causa/ de qua Newtonus nihil statuit, occulta dicenda \dicenda/ esterit donec manifesta addatum dici{ndo} potest occulta. Occultam tamen esse in sensu Scholasticorū, ita scilicet ut manifestari non poterit, Newtonus minima statuit. {illeg} Su D. Leibnitius ludit in verbis et Newtonum calumnia adoritur. Ludit etiam in verbis ub Deum vocat qui non est Dominus Universorum, et animam vocat quo corpus non animatur.

<235r>

conjungi quiant ut cohærescunt. p. 340. lin. 27.

Quæst.24. May not the forces by wch the small particles of bodies \cohere & act/ upon one another \at small distances/ for producing the above mentioned phænomena of nature, be electric? For altho electric bodies do not act at a sensible distance unless their virtue be excited by friction, yet that vertue may not be generated by friction but only expanded. For the particles of all bodies may abound with an electric spirit wch reaches not to any sensible distance from the particles unless agitated by friction & exp or \by/ some other cause & expan re|a|refied by the agitation. And the friction may not rarefy the spirit \not/ of all the particles in the electric body but only |of| those \only/ wch are on the outside of it: so that the action of the particles \of the body/ upon one another for \cohering &/ producing the above mentioned phænomena may be vastly greater then that of the whole electric body to attract at a sensible distance by friction. And if there be such an \{illeg} universal/ electric spirit \in body/, certail|n|ly it must very much influence the {illeg} actions & motions & actions of the small parts \particles/ of \the/ bodies upon |amongst| one another. so that \without/ considering it, philosophers will never be able to give an account of the above mentioned phænomena \the phænomena arising from/ those motions & actions. And Quæst 25. Do not all bodies therefore aboun so far as these phænomena may be performed \expl performed/ by the spirit wch causes electric attraction it is unphilosophical to look for any other cause.

Quæst 25 Do not all bodies therefore abound wth an electric a very subtile active spirit \potent/ elastic spirit by wch light is emitted refractec & reflected, electric attractions & fugations are performed, & the small particles of bodies cohere when contiguous, & agitate one another at small distances & regulate almost all their motions amongst themselves. For electric – – – – uniting the thinking soul & unthinking body. This spirit may be also of great use in vegetation, wherein three things are to be considered, generation, nutrition & præparation of nourishment.

Generation is nothing else then separating a branch from the tree & giving it better nourishment. If a separated branch takes root in the earth & or a separated twigg or bud by grafting or inoculation {illeg} is nourished from ye root of a young stock, it grows into a \new/ tree as big a the f|t|ro|e|e from wch it was separated being better nourished from a young root then from an old one. The seed of a tree while it grows upon the tree has the nature of a branch or twig or bud, {where} it while it grows upon ye tree it has the nature of is a part of it like a bud {illeg} the tree: but if separated & set in the earth to be better nourished, the embryo \or young tree/ conteined in it takes root & grows into a new tree. \like manner/ The egg of a female \wth the embryo formed in it/ while it grows in the ovarium {illeg} seed is a part \branch/ of ye mothers body but the Embryo formed in it \& partakes of her life, {illeg} \&/ The embryo/ is as capable of growing great being separated from the mother & growing great by due nourishment as a branch or twigg or budd or seed \of a tree/ is of being separated from the tree & growing into a new tree. For by the act of generation nothing more is done then to ferment the sperm of the female by ye sperm of ye male that it \may/ thereby become fit nourishment for ye Embryo. For ye nourishment of all animals is prepared by fermentation \\& the ferment is/ taken from animals of the same kind , being {illeg} \& makes the nourishment/ subtile & spiritual. thereby/ In adult animals the nourishmt is fermented by the choler & pancreatic juice, & much more ought ye nourishemt of an Embryo to be prepared by fermentation & this for yet \both wch come from the blood. The Embryo not/ being able to ferment its own nourishment {illeg} \wch comes from the mothers blood has it/ fermented by the sperm wch comes from ye fathers blood, & by this nourishment {bec} |it| swells, drops off from & Ovarium & begins to grow with a life distinct from that of ye mother. And in Oviparous creatures if the sperm of the female {illeg} be not an ingredient of the egg \fermented with the sperm of the {f}|m|ale/ the white & ye yelk {sic} \of the egg/ will |not| be fit nourishment for the Embryo. [So then generation is nothing else then the the Embryo grows upon the body of the mother before generation as a twig grows upon a tree & \all/ generation is nothing else than the preparation of due nourishments for the Embryo to grow with a distinct life distinct life when separated. from th]

Now in all fermentation wch generates spirits, the ferment abounds wth a supprest acid wch being more attracted by the other body forsakes its own <235v> to rush upon & dissolve ye other & by the violence of the actions breaks both its own particles & the particles of ye other body into smaller particles & these by their subtilty volatility & continual digestion {illeg} resolve ye whole mass into into as subtile parts as they \it/ can be resolved by putrefaction. [And by this means bodies \must/ lose their old form & texture before they & be \destroyed &/ broken to pieces into the last parts before they can be formed.] For as an old house must be pulled {illeg} down & its stones separated before they can be put together in another manner a new house can be be {sic} built out of their its materials: So \natural/ bodies must be \dissolved/ broken & separated into {illeg} their least parts by fermentation & putrefaction & lose their \old/ form \& texture/ before they can be formed anew a new \natural/ body can be formed out of them.

And when the nutriment \nourishment/ is thus prepared by dissolution \& subtiliation/, the particles {illeg} are of the body to be nourished draw to themselves out of the nourishment the particles of the same density & nature wth themselves. For bodies particles of one & the same nature draw one another more strongly then particles of different natures do. And when |And {sic} therefore in the bowels of the earth {illeg} particles of the same nature are apt to assemble in the same masses & those of different natures in different masses. And when| many particles of the same kind are drawn together out of ye nourishment they will be apt to coalesce in such figure textures as the particles wch drew them did before because they are of the same nature because as we see in \the particles of/ salts wch if they be of the same figure kind always crystallize in the same figures. And b for faciliating this assimilation of ye nourishment & presering the nourished bodies from corruption it may be presumed that as electric attraction is excited by friction so the electric {atr} it is {excited} \invigoted|ra|ted/ also by the vegetable {life} life so it may be invigorated also by some other causes & particularly \by some agitation caused in the electric spirit/ by the vegetable life of the |particles of| living substances: & the ceasing of this vigour upon death may be \the/ reason why |ye| death \of Animals/ is accompanied wth putrefaction.

But these things I only hint as Quæres without asserting any thing. I {illeg} \under the heads of Quæres/

These things I have proposed under the heads of Quæres & leave them to be examined.

by such a fermentation as generates spirits convenient spirits.

For all the use wch nature makes of such fermentations \& putrefactions/ as generate spirits & \& tends to pe & are the beginning of putrefaction/ seems to be for destroying the texture \texture &/ forms & breaking the texture of of the particles of bodies of bodies & breaking their particles into less particles whereby they may become subtile & spiritual & fit nourishment for things wch grow. For fermentation & putrection {sic} destroys \& subtilizes/ & reduces all things to their least parts \particles/ & nutrition recomposes those particles & sets them together in such an order as to be like to make them become of the same nature wth the things nourished.]

<236r>

De Motu et Sensatione Animalium.

1 Attractionem electricam per spiritum quendam fieri qui corporibus universis inest, et \aquam/ vitrum \Crystallum aliaque corpora solida libere permeat/ libere pervadit. Nam corpora electrica post fortiter attritio|a|nem aurum foliatum per interpositam \aquæ vel/ vitri substantiam trahunt.

3 Capillamenta pellucid \utiq/ solida \uniformia et/ pellucida a cerebro per omnes sensuum nervos ad organa sensuum produci et spiritum electricum in his capillamentis latentem esse medium per \elasticum et/ cujus vibratio{eibus} per totam capillamentorum longitudinem propagatis s in sensorium quam celerrime propagatis sensatione peraga|i|tur.

4 |Et| Capillamenta alia solida \uniformia/ et pellucida a cerebro per medullam spinalem |in| ad musculos propagari \pergere/. Et spiritu \spiretus electrici in his nervis latentis/ vibrationes a cerebro per spiritum {electrici} in his cap{illeg}illamentis|a| latentem in musculos propa\ga/ri quibus musculi \agitati contraha/ contrahantur ad membra movenda. His \utiq/ vibrationibus vim electricam in cuticulis musculorum intendi, & per vim ullam \auctam/ cuticulas aliquantulum contrahi & \{sic} contractione sua/ musculos \simul/ contrahere. Nam spatium solidum quod musculus occupat diminuitur per contractionē musculi

2 Spiritum hunc electricum esse medium quo sensatio obje \dilatari et contrahi et propterea elasticum esse & eundemq/ in nervis \animalium/ latentem esse medium quo objecta sentimus et \ictu oculi/ corpora \membra/ movemus. [\Nam/ Spiritus quos vocant animales nervis corporei nervis corporei sunt et e nervis in musculos tam cito propagari nequeunt ob densitatem tardius|e| moventur.] & vibrationes per eundem quam celerrime propagari.

4 Et capillamenta alia solida uniformia & pellucida a cerebro per medullā spinalem in musculos propagari \produci/; \ac \per quae/ vibrationes/ & Spiritus\um/ \autem/ electrici|o|\rum/ [in his nervis \capillamentis/ latentis|ū| vibrationes] a cerebro per capillamenta in musculos propagari ad membra movenda substantiam musculorum agitandam et membra movenda. Liquores enim \sic/agitati expandi debent perinde ac si per calorem agitarentur, & \musculi/ per expansionem suam musculos contrahent liquorum suorum contrahentur, & membra movebunt.

4 Et capillamenta alia solida uniformia & pellucida a cerebro per medullam spinalem et ejus ramos in musculos pergere per quæ vibrationes spirituum electricorum a cerebro propagentur ad substantiam musculorum agitandam & membra movenda. Liquores enim per has vibrationes agitati expandi debent perinde ac si per calorem agitarentur.

Vibrationes in spiritu elastico per radios lucis {illeg} excitari.

Spiritum electium lucere {&} reflectere refrangere & per lucem agitari

<237r>

De vita \& morte/ vegetable.

1 Corpora omnia vim habent electricam & particulas eorum electricas ad parvas tantum agere distantias agere nisi vis eorum vim illam in superficiebus particularum fortissimam esse sed ad parvas tantum distantias \non longe/ {illeg} extendi nisi frictione vel alia aliqua actione cieatur.

3 Particulas corporum per vim electricam diversimonde coalescere & fortissime \arte/ cohærere. Et particulas minores fortius agere & artius cohærere.

Particulas menstrui quæ maxima vi attr electrica linguam particulas linguæ fortissime agitant sensationem acidi ciere.

Menstruum corp acidum corpora \densa/ dissolvere per particulas \suas/ acidas, vi sua attractrice in pa intersticia partium ultimæ compositionis irruentes & partem unamquamq circumeuntes & circumdantes ut cortex nucleum vel atmosphæra terram. et partem\s/ \vero/ acido circumdatas corpus suum linquere et in Menstruo fluitare, atq acido suo \ambiente/ linguam pungere excitando sensationem salis. Nam acidum a parte \nucleo/ inclusa|o| attractum & retentum in partes agit{a} minus fo \& impeditum/ minus agit{at} \in/ linguam quam prius.

Acidum salis ab externo corpore magis attractum quam a nucleo proprio, in externum illud ruit & nucleus acido nudatus \pondere suo decidit & in fundum/ præcipitatur.

His dissolutionibus particulas corporum \acidas/ vehementer agitari et \agitari et earum vim electricā/ per agitationem |suam| et frictionem, vis \earum vim/ electricam intendi{illeg} & longius {illeg} agere \propagari \quam prius/ & dissolutionem promovere./. Nam vis electrica per frictionem {&} cieri solet.

Particulas acidas partibus corporum dissolutis \dissolutis cor dissovendis corporum partibus/ compositionis ultimæ longe minores esse ut \in/ earum insterstitia ingredi \irruere/ possint et sed non adeo parvas tamen ut poros harum partium pervadant permeent. Ideoq partes \immutatæ manent/ acidoq suo \ambiente/ nudatæ ut supra & præcipitatæ, si sint metallici generis \ut fundi possint/ per fusionem in corpus antiquum redeunt. Mercurius itidem cum metallis amalgamando commixtum interstitia partium compositionis ultimæ ingreditur, poros autem harum partium ingredi non potest idioq per destillationē abstractus relinquit partes immutatas, & hæ partes per fusionem in corpus antiquum pristinum revertuntur.

Si dissolutio ejusmodi est ut per actionem Menstrui et reactionem corporis spiritus aliqui subtiliores excitentur qui poros particularum & compositionis ultimæ pervadere \possint/ ingredi possint, tunc spiritus illi \paulatim permeant &/ dissolvunt has partes perinde u et in particulas compositionis penultimæ separant, perinde ut Menstruum acidum dissolvebat corpus totum et in partes compositionis p ultimæ, in casu priore separabat. Et corpus formam veterem jam amisit. Nam particulæ compositionis penultimæ in partes compositionis ultimæ non nisi per generationemm redeunt. Et par est ratio dissolutionis particularum compositionis penultimæ in particulas compositionis ante penultimæ &c. Hasce vero dissolutiones p corruptionem corporis et putrefactionem dicere solemus.

Fermentum est substantia quæ spiritibus sub

Putrefactio per fermentum quandaq inducitur, et fermentum est corpus vegetabile spiritibus abundans quibus \{illeg} poros/ partes|iū| corporis corporis fermentandi putrefaciendi ingredi \compositionis ultimæ permeare/ possunt et dissolvere & partes {illeg} illas dissolvere, & dissolvendo novos ejusdem generis spiritus \paulatim/ excitare quibus dissolutio \putrefactio/ compleatur. Nutrimentum animalium per succos in stomacho et maxime per |bilem| fermentatur.

Dissolutio corporis in partes compositionis ultimæ violentior est, & cito perficitur \& cessat/. Ea partium illarum in partem|es||i|\{bus}/ compositionis penultimæ lente fit \diuturnior est/ & modico |peragitur| calore qui spiritus subtiliores dissolventes non abigat sed actionem eorum juvet.

Corpus per putrefactionem fractum comminutum & in partes minimas redactum, formam veterem amisit & formarum innumerabilium novarum per generationem est capax. Nam corruptio \putrefactio/ corpus comminuit generatio partes minimas {illeg} congregat. conjungit & in ordinem \denuo/ redigit idq diversimode secundum naturam corporis vivi cui substantia fermentata et corr putrefacta in nutrimen{} præbetur. Ut cum vegetabilia innumera eodem fimo, innumera animalia \innumera/ eodem cibo per bilem fermentato nutriuntur.

|Ut frictione corporis electrici intenditur ejus attractio sic etiam etiam| Actione vivendi intenditur vis electrica partium viventis, qua \& forti attractione/ fit ut partes illæ et situm \formam/ propriu|a|m \& situm/ inter se conservent & nutrimento suo paulatim communicent <237v> perinde ut Manges convertit ferrum in magnetem & ignis convertit corpora in ignem & fermentum convertit pastam in fermentum: at cessante vita \vegetabili/ cessat attractio illa \vegetabilis/ vitalis et \ejus defectu simul/ incipit actio moriendi quam corruptionem & putrefactionem dicimus.

In generatione animalium per misturam et fermentationem seminum cietur et accenditur attractio vegetabilis \attractio vegetabilis cietur & quasi flamma vitalis accenditur/ qua languescente animal debilitatur & ægrotat & cessante moritur & putrescit: et contra. Ovum in ovario matris ante generationem vivit \quidem tantum/ ut pars corporis materni: post \at/ per fermentationem seminum vitam propriam \vegi|e|tabilem/ acquirit ut animal a matre diversum, & vita propria \per hanc vitam/ statim incipit vegetare \ac crescere/ & nutrimentum in se convertere. [Fermentatio autem per attractionem uti diximus perficitur et \motu excitato suo/ attractionem illam intendit & fortiorem reddit]. Per fermentum corpo itaque corpora mortua dissolvuntur, viva nutriuntur & crescunt. Mortua propter debilem partium attractionem \non dissolvuntur sed/ menstruum vincunt. De motu

2 Corpora vi electrica quandoq \plerumq/ trahi quadoq vero dispelli per experimenta constat; et particulas aeris \& vaporum/ sese dispellere. Particulas etiam aqua olei dispellere particulas aquæ.

<238r>

Si posset Menstruum alios illos pervadere, vel si auri partes primæ et secundæ compositionis possent separari, fieret aurum vel fluidum vel saltem magis malleabile. Si aurum fermentescere posset [et [per putrefactionem in particulas minimas resolvi, idem ad instar substantiarum vegetabilium & animalium putrescentium, formam suam amitteret, in fimum \pristinum/ abiret vegetabilibus nutriendis aptum & \idem/ {aliud} \{fortum}/ \per digestionem in fimum \mollem/ resolvi vegetabilibus nutriendis aptum, idem &/ per generationem] in aliud quodvis corpus transformari posset. [Et similis et ratio Gemmarum & mineralium \corp ossium &/ omnium corporum durorum |Eadem intellige de Gemmis \mineralibus/ |lapi| ossibus & aliis corporibus duris & eorum partibus compisitionis primæ secundæ tertiæ &c ultimæ.|

Visciditas est imperfecta fluiditas cum attractione partium. Fluiditas autem \Fluiditas/ sita est in partium parvitate qua facile commoveantur et lubricitate qua facile labantur inter se. Intellige partes ultimæ compositionis. Visciditas est imperfecta fluiditas cum attractione partium \cohæsione partium/ |cum {sic}| \per attractionem partium./ Hujus visciditatis acidum sæpe causa est, sæ spiritus alius lubricus terræ junctus: ut cum Oleum Terebinthinæ capiti suo mortuo redditum fit tenax.

Charta oleo inuncta transitum oleo {illeg} \quidem, non autem/ aquæ, concedit, propterea quod aqua oleo non miscetur sed fugatur ab eo.

Acidum primigenium videtur\2/ constare\1/ particulis \compositis/ figuram sphæricam per summam attractionem induentibus \[perinde ut Terra per gravitatem sphærica fit]/; et particulæ hae sunt majores aquæ & minores terræ partibus, seu inter eas mediæ, et utrarumq attractrices.

Cum acidæ Menstrui particulæ corpus aliquod dissolvunt, hæ \ob parvitatem/ poros corporis majores ingrediuntur & singulas ejus particulas internas \compositionis ultimæ,/ seipsis utiq longe majores, circumeunt & includunt undiq [ut cortex nucleum vel mare terram et includendo separant a corpore. [Unaquæq vero corporis particula mediante acido attracto et circumposito in Menstro deinceps fluitat & linguam pungit, hoc est in particulam salis convertitur. Deinde actione et reactione lenta et continua inter particulam corporis et acidum ambiens per fermentationem naturalem excitata, acidum \spiritus subtilus generantem/ \excitata spiritus illi/ poros particulæ paulatim ingredi\un/tur, texturam ejus lente dissolvi\un/t & cum ea tandem misce\n/tur per minima: quam operationem putrefactionem dicimus. Corpus jam maxime comminutum et cum particulis acidis inseparabiliter commixtum formam veterem amisit & formarum innumerabilium novarum factum est capax, siquidem particulæ compositi per generationem iterum congregari, coalescere et in ordinem redigi possint, idq diversimode pro natura corporum vivorum quibus nutrimentum præbeant.] Viva enim per fortem attractionem \& magnitudinem particularum/ formam \seu texturam/ suam et servant et nutrimento suo paulatim communicant: at cessante vita cessat attractio \illa/ vitalis et incipit actio moriendi quam corruptionem et putrefactionem dicimus.] Nam quemadmodum vis electrica per frictionem cietur & vis magnetis in ferrum transfertur et vis urendi in corpora ignem nutrientia propagatur: sic vis quædam attractiva per fermentationem naturalem cieri videtur, in qua vita vegetabilis consistit, quæq ideo attractio vitalis dici mereatur, et hæc vis ab actione vivendi conservari \videtur/ et a corpore vivente |in corpore fermentato cieri videtur et in corporibus vivis per actionem vegetandi conservari &| in nutrimentum paulatim transferri, potest et cessante vita cessare.] Et hæc vis electrici videtur esse generis propterea quod per motum et attritionem particularum corporis vegetantis cieatur. Corpora utiq omnia quantum sentio vi electrica pollent, et particulæ electricæ ad minimas distantias semper agere possunt fortissime et per actiones illas diversimode coalescere et cohærere; et actiones illæ electricæ in fermentatione et vegetatio{ne} <238v> per motum et frictionem particularum intendi possunt et longius propagari, et cessante motu remitti.

Si aurum ferementescere posset [corrup & per corruptionem in v|f|imum verti vegetabilius nutriendis aptum, idem per o

Nam quemadmodum domus antiqua dirui debet et in lapides singulos separari debet priusquam ex ejus materia domus nova construatur deinde ex lapidibus novo ordine compositis domus innumeri nova formæ cujuscunq componi possit: sic fit in resolutione & compositione corporum naturalium. Corpus antiquum per putrefactionem dirui debet et in particulas minimas ex quibus generatum fuit resolvi priusquam ex ejus materia corpus novum generari potest, [deinde ex materia putrefacta corpora \nova/ diversarum formarum generari posunt] Generatio autem illa Et ubi particulæ illæ subtilissimæ diversarum magnitud densitatum magnitudinum & virtutum per \fermentationem &/ putrefactionem separantur & inter se confuse miscentur, & menstruum dissolvens & corrumpens aciditatem suam agendo amissit;tum apta est materia \illa/ per fermentationem & putrefactionem attenuata ad nutriendum corpus vivum ejusdem generis cum corpore ex quo fermentum desumptum fit fuit.

<239r>

Various Conjectures.

Flame is fume & differs from

Flame is red hot fume & differs from fume wch is not red hot as red hot iron differs from iron wch is not red hot.

Heat is the \consists in ye trembling/ agitation of the \smallest/ parts of bodies all manner of ways; no body being \& the parts of all/ bodies are always in some agitation.

The globe of the Earth is perpetually increased by the sediment of water

Earth is the \condensed/ sediment of water & water is fluid earth.

Burning spirits are oyles united wth phlegm by fermentation.

Tincture of Cochinell extracted wth spirit of wine being powered in small quantity into a great mass of water, tinges the whole water because the particles of the Cochinell are more attracted by the water then by one another, & therefore recede |from one another.|

Water has but a small power of attracting because it has but a small quantity of acid in its composition. For we call that an acid wch attracts & is attracted strongly. Whence it is that those things wch dissolved in water are dissolved slowly & without effervescence. But where there is a strong \the/ attraction is strong & the particles of the menstruum are every where \on all sided/ attracted by the particles of the metal or rather the \a/ particles of the metall are \is/ on all sides attracted by the particles of the menstruum, these agitate the \particles/ wth violence it & carry it of from the metall, that is they corrode & eat the metall And the same particles applied to ye tongue leave the subtile earth to wch they adhered before & by a greater attraction rush into the liquids of the tongue agitate & disjoyne its parts & cause a painfull sensation by reason of wch we call them acid.

In every solution made by a menstruum, the particles to be dissolved are more attracted by the particles of the menstruum then by one another; & therefor |leave one another to float in the menstruum.|

In every fermentation there is a supprest acid wch is coagulated by precipitation upon the body suppressing it

Oyle intimately mixed wth a very great quantity of flegm becomes of a nature something saline & so constitutes vinegre \whose acid particles if separated from ye flegm {illeg} acid particles {illeg} \would be a/ volatile salt./ Under this head tartar is also to be considered

Mercury is attracted that is corroded {illeg} by acids. And as by its weight it opens obstructions, so by it attractive force it \draws acids & to it self & suppresses them./ suppresses them|acids|. Mercury is volatile & rises easily by heat because its particles of the last composition are small & are easily separated, & being separated endeavour to recede from one another, as happens also in the particles of vapour & rarefied fluids.

Water cannot be comprest because its particles \already/ touch one another. And if air was so far comprest as to make its particles touch one another it might become a stone.

<240r>

Corpora utiq omnia densa particulis electricis abundare \valde constare/ videntur & nonnullas etiam habere particulas magneticas. Et attractiones elec quemadmodū attractio gravitatis ad majores Planetarum Cometarum Cometarum & maris nostri motus explicandos sufficit: sic vires electricæ ad motus minores alios \omnes/ particularum corporum motus expicandos sufficere videntur ad explicandas actiones et motus particularum inter se corporis cujuscunq inter se sufficere videntur; posito scilicet quod particulæ electricæ ad parvas distantias semper agant fortissime ad magnas vero distantias non agant nisi virtus earum frictione \vel actione vegetandi/ vel alia aliqua actione cieatur.

Corpus jam comminutum attenuatum & cum particulis acidis inseparabiliter commixtum formam veterem amisit & formarum innumerabilium novarum \factum est/ capax re siquidem particulæ {illeg} compositi per generationem iterum congregari coalescere et in ordinem redigi qu possit, idq diversimode pro natura corporum viventi vivorum quibus nutrimentum præbe\a/nt. Viva enim

Et hæc vis electrici videtur esse generis propterea quod per motum cietur & attritionem particularum \corporis/ vegetantium|s| cieatur. {In} Corpora utiq omnia \quantum sentio/ vi electrica pollent, & hæc particulæ electricæ ad minimas distantias semper agere possunt fortissime, & per actiones illas cohærere ubi sese contingunt, & commovere ubi sese non contingunt diversimode coalescere et cohærere et ubi actio per frictionem particularū intenditur vel longius propagatur novis motibus agitari actiones illæ per frictionem particularum \electricæ/ in fermentatione & vegetatione \per frict particularum/ intendi possunt & longius propagari et cessante motu remitti. Quinetiam vires magneticæ particularum ferri ad formationem corporum conducere possunt. Nam particulæ ferri per terrestria omnia sparguntur.

<240v>

Quod si aurum \naturaliter/ fermentescere posset, & in fimum putridum ad instar substantiarum animalium et vegetabilium abire, idem similiter nutriendo animalia per nutritionem in corpora per nutritionem in aliud quodvis corpus \nutritum/ posset transformari nutrimentum præberet animalibus & vegetabilibus & sic posset in aliud quodvis p in omnia corpora posset transformari. Et similis est ratio mineralium gemmarum et mineralium omnium.

Si aurum \naturaliter/ fermentescere posset, idem per putrefactionem ac generationem \particulas minimas separantem/ (ad instar animalium ac vegetabilium) in aliud quodvis corpus \formam suam amittere & in nutriment/ in fimum & inde \abire & subinde / \per generationem \vel nutritionem// in aliud quodves corpus posset \vivum/ transformari \posset/. Et similis est ratio gemmarum et mineralium omnium.

Si aurum fermentescere posset [& per p cum fluido quovis disecante per putrefactionem in particulas minimas resolvi, idem, ad instar substantiarum vegetablium & animalium \putrescentium/, formam {illeg} \suam/ amitteret, in fimum abiret vegetabilibus nutriendis aptum & subinde per generationem] in aliud quodvis corpus \vegetando/ transformari posset. [Et similis est ratio Gemmarum & mineralium omnium.]

Visciditas est fit per defectum fluiditatis quæ \utiq/ sita est in partium parvitate qua {illeg} \facile moveantur/ & lubricitate seu lævore quo lab facile \agitaren{illeg} &/ labuntur inter se. Intellige partes ultimæ compositiones. Hujus visciditatis —

Visciditas est imperfecta fluiditas cum attractione partium. Fluiditas autem sita est in partium parvitate qua facile moveantur & lubricitate qua facile labantur inter se. Intellige partes ultimæ compositionis. Hujus

Cum acidi particulæ corpus aliquod dissolvunt, hæ particulas corporis \poros corporis majores ingrediuntur & singulas corporis ejus particulas externas/ seipsis \utiq/ longe majores \circumeunt &/ includunt undiq ut follicula \testa cortex/ nucleum vel mare terram, & includendo separant a corpore et in menstruo fluitant Sic corporis unaquæq \et unaquæque corporis/ particula per \mediante/ acidu|o|m \attractu|o|m &/ circumpositu|o|m \in menstruo \deinceps/ fluitat hoc est adeoq/ in particulam salis convertitur.

Deinde actione & reactione lenta et continua inter acidum et particulam inclusam per fermentationem naturalem excitata, partic acidum poros particulæ paulatim ingreditur, texturam ejus \lente/ dissolvit, & cum ea \tandem/ miscetur per minima: Quam operationem putrefactionem dicimus. Compositum vero \sic contritum et comminutum/ formas novas innumeras induere potest perinde ut |Corpus, jam veterem \fractum/ formam \veterem/ amisit & compositum \informe/ sic contritum attenuatum & \inseparabiliter/ comminutum \ < insertion from lower down f 240v > et informe redditum. < text from f 240v resumes > / formarū novarum innumerarum capax est propterea quod| ejus particulæ \inter se/ per novam \novam/ generationem in particulas majores modis innumeris coalescere possunt.

Nam corpora|ū| omnia|ū| \particulæ/ per putrefactionem dividuntur \& separantur, {illeg} \& confuse miscentur// per generationem coalescunt \congregantur/ & in particulas majores congregantur |coalescunt & in ordinem rediguntur idq \diversimode/ pro natura viventium quibus nutrimentum præbent|

Viva enim per fortem attractionem formam suam et servant et nutrimento \paulatim/ communicant, at cessante vita cessat attractio vitalis et incipit actio mor{illeg}rum quæ est putr corruptio \moriendi/ quam corruptionem vel putrefactionem dicimus. Nam quemadmodum vis electrica per frictionem cietur, & vis magnetica in ferrum Magneti appositum imprimitur transfertur \propagatur & vis urendi ab igne in corpora {illeg} ignem nutrientia propagatur/: sic vis quæ vis quædam attractiva per fermentationem naturalem cieri {illeg} videtur, in qua vita vegetabilis consistit quæq ideo attractio vitalis dici mereatur, & hæc vis \ab actione vivendi conservari et/ a corpore vivente in nutrimentum paulatim transferri potest, et cessante vita extingui cessare.

<241v>

Quæst. Do not all bodies abound with uncertain \a very subtile active/ \vibrating/ spirit by wch light is emitted reflected & refracted, electric & magnetic attractions \& fugations/ are performed, the contiguous \small/ particles of bodies cohære when contiguous, & agitate one another at {illeg} \small/ distances & regulate \almost/ all their motions amongst themselves as the great bodies of the Universe regulate theirs by the power of gravity? For electric bodies could not act at a distance without a spirit reaching to that distance. And by several experiments shewn by Mr Hawksby before ye R. Society it appears that a cylindrical rod of glass or hard wax strongly rubbed emitts an electric spirit or vapour wch may be felt by the pushes against the hand or face so as to be felt, & upon application of the finger to ye electric body crackles & flashes, & that the \electric spirit reaches to ye distance of half a foot or a foot from the glass or above &/ electric spirit passes \readily/ through the solid body \of a plate or vessel/ of glass \plates/, the electric body attracting things beyond the {illeg} the glass; & that \if/ a globe of glass being nimbly turned round upon an axis & \in turning/ rub {illeg} upon a man's hand to excite its electric virtue, the glass emits an electr the hand if the glass be empty of air shines through the glass wth a {illeg} purple light, if the some air be let into the glass, the whole cavity of ye glass appears illuminated wth flashes of a whiter light; if the air be let in freely the glass emitts an electric vapour \or spirit/ wch may be felt by the hand & wch in striking \dashing/ upon the hand \or upon white paper or a handkerchief/ at the distance of a quarter of an inch \or half an inch/ from the glass or above, illuminates the hand or pl|a|per or handkerchief with a white light while the glass continues in motion, the vap spirit by striking upon those bodies being agitated so as to emit the light. & that if some threds of cotton or worsted yorn hanging by one end at a little distance from one another be attracted at the other end towards the glass, & a mans finger be advanced towards the threds attracted ends of the threds, the threds will recede from the finger, & this they will do as well when ye finger they are within the glass as when they are without it. There is therefore an electric spirit by wch bodies are in some cases attracted in others repelled & this spirit \is so subtile as to p{illeg}/ pervades \& passes through/ the solid body of glass very freely in both cases, & is capable of contraction & dilatation expanding it self to great distances from the gl electric body by friction, & thefore {sic} is elastic & susceptible of a vibrating motion like that of air whereby sounds are propagated, & this motion is very \exceeding/ quick so that the \electric/ spirit can thereby emit light. And that \wch/ emits light in the experiments above mentioned, may emitt{s} it in all shining bodies whenever sufficiently agitated either by heat or by putrefaction. And the Medium wch emitts light may also \be able to/ refract & reflect it \as was noted above/. And that {g} \This spirit/ may be also the Medium by whose vibrating agitations gross \stirred up with|i|i|n|n dense/ bodies, the bodies receive heat [& conserve it a long time] & communicate it to contiguous bodies; the vibrations being propagated from the medium in reflected wch being propagated from one body into another where the bodies are contiguous, but reflected at the surface where they are not contiguous & by reflections kept within the hot body. The like vibrations may be excited in the bottom of the eye by light & propagated thence into the sensorium for through the \solid capillamenta of the/ optick nerves into the sensorium for causing vision & the like of other senses. The like vibrations may be also propagated from the brain through the \solid fibres of the/ spinal marrow & its branches into ye muscles for agitating & expanding the liquors therein & thereby contracting the muscles to cause an|th|e motions of animals. For as liquors are expanded <241r> by the heat {& by} & therefore also \& by consequence/ by the vibrating agitations of this spirit. If the agitations be of short continuance they expand the liquors without heating them \for want of time to do it./ If lasting (as in running a race, or |in| supporting a burden \without external motion of the body/) they heat the body by degrees & \at length/ excite sweat. This spirit therefore seems to \may/ be the medium \of sense of animal motion & by consequence/ of uniting the soul & body thinking soul & unthinking body.

[The vegetable life may also consist in the power of this spirit supposing that this substance is stronger & reaches to a greater \distance in/ in things wch have a the particles of \power in/ substances wch have a vegetable life then in others is stronger then in others \&/ reaches to a greater distance from the particles. For as the electric vertue is stronger in invigorated by friction so it maybe by some other causes. And by \& of gre/ being stronger in \the particles of/ living substances then in others it may preserve them from corruption, & [by reaching further from the{se} particles they may] act upon the nourishment to make it of like form & vertue wth themselves \living particles/ as a magnet turns iron into a magn communicates its vertue to iron \turns iron to a magnet/ & fire turns its nourishment to fire & leaven turns past to leaven. For the living particles may propagate the vibrating motions of their spirit into into {sic} the contiguous particles of the nourishment & cause ye spirit in those particles to vibrate \& act/ after ye same manner & by that action to modify the nourishment after the same manner with the living particles.

When The life of a vegetable is in the whole vegetable & in every part of it. For every banch {sic} & every bud & every seed will grow being duly nourished will grow into a new tree. And in like manner the life of an animal is in the whole animal \female/ & in every egg of the female. And as the \twiggs & budds &/ seeds of a vegetable \tree/ partake{illeg} of the life of the life of the {sic} vegetable \tree/ & have no distinct lives of their own whereby they can grow into a new vegetable \tree/ untill they be separated from ye tree on wch they grow. And as the branch or seed of a tree being separated from the tree & put into ye earth where it may receive due nourishment may grow into a new tree: so the egg of a female being separated from the branch body of the female & converged into ye womb & duly nourished may grow into a new animal. The nourishment of the seed of a plant is {illeg} putrid rain water, the nourishment {illeg} This sink{illeg}|s| into the seed, softens it & sets its parts at liberty to exercise their vegetable life in \retaining & digesting &/ converting some part of ye water into a substance like themselves their own nature. The nourishment of the seed \egg/ of an animal is the seed of the male & female mixed & fermented together in \the act of/ generation. For all nourishment of animals is prepared by fermentation. That of adult animals is fermented by the choler & pancreatic juce both wch come from the blood. That of the egg \an Egg or Embrio therin/ is the feminine sperm fermented with the masculine \both wch also come from the blood/. By fermentation the nourishment is subtilized & replenished with spirit & put into motion whereby it first acts upon the egg & \swells it & makes it fall off from the Ovarium/ then is But the egg \(or Embrio therein)/ having a vegetable life is not corrupted by the nourishment but overcomes {illeg} it & digests it into its own nature & grows into an animal. In oviparous creatures if the where the white & the yelk {sic} of the egg are the nourishment of the embrio; if the seed of the male do\th/ not enter the composition of the egg the Embrio will not grow. So then all for want of due nourishment. So then generation is nothing else then preparation of due nourishment for making the Embrio begin to grow. with a life distinct from that of the parents. Before generation it grew as a parts of the mothers body, By genera & \by growing in that manner/ was shaped into an Embryo ({illeg} for the seeds of trees have young plants in them) after by generation it receives new nourishment whereby it begins to grow as an animal distinct from is mother. & the mixture of male & female sperms is only for preparing this nourishment.

<242r>

All bodies seem to be composed of hard particles for otherwise fluids would not congeale, as water, oyles, Vinegre, & Spirit or oyle of Vitriol do by freezing, Mercury by fumes of Lead, as Spirit of Nitre & Mercury by dissolving the Mercury & evaporating the flegm, spirit of wine & spirit of Urin by deflegming & mixing \them/ & spirit of Urin & spirit of salt by subliming them together to make salarmoniack. Even the rays of light seem to be hard bodies, for otherwise they would not retain different properties in their different sides. And therefore hardness may be recconed the property of all uncompounded matter. I say uncompounded becomes \matter/ compounded {not} of hard particles may be soft or fluid by the sliding of ye particles amongst themselves [{If} hard \particles of/ sands compose soft quicksands, & hard small fragments of the hardest bodies compose soft powder {illeg}] but can never grow hard but matter composed only of soft particles can never grow hard. < insertion from the top of f 242v > And therefore since all bodies so far as experience reaches are either hard or {illeg} may be hardened, we may conclude \affirm/ from experience that they all consist of hard particles. < text from f 242r resumes > While \& therefore/ The \the har/ hardening of fluids is a|n| proo \{illeg} plain experimental/ proof that they are composed of hard particles. And indeed the simpl uncompounded particles of bodies seem to be so very hard as never to wear or |At least this seems to be as evident as the univer universal impenetrability of matter For all bodies so far as experience reaches are either hard or may be hardened & we have no other evidence of universal impenetrability besides a large experience without exception. & this Rule, that without experience exceptions are not to be made against the {illeg} of Nature.| < insertion from f 242v > A property of all uncompounded matter. This seems to be as evident \at least/ as ye universal impenetrability of matter. For \all bodies so far as experience reaches are either hard or may be hardened &/ we have no other evidence of the \universal/ impenetrability of matter than \besides/ a large experienc without any thing appearing to the contrary. < text from f 242r resumes > < insertion from f 242v > property of all uncompounded matter. At least this seems to be as evident as \the/ universal impenetrability of matter. For all bodies, so far as experience reaches are either hard or may be hardened & we have no other evidence of universal impenetrability besides a large experience wthout exception. And if compound bodies may be so \very/ hard as we find some of them to be — — — — their cohesion. < text from f 242r resumes > And if compound bodies may be so very hard as we find many of them to be, & ye{illeg}|t| are very porous & consist of parts wch are \only/ layed together, the simple bodies \particles/ wch are void of \pores/ & were never yet divided, must be much harder. For such hard bodies \particles/ being heaped up together can scarce touch one another in more then a few points & therefore must be separable by much less force {then} is requisite to break a solid particle whose parts \were never yet separated f/ touch in all the space between them wthout any pores {illeg} \without any pores or interstices to weaken their cohesion/ & were never yet {illeg}ded; And how \such very hard/ bodies \particles/ wch are only laid together & touch only in points can stick together, & that so firmly as they do, without the assistance of something wch causes them to be attracted or prest towards one another is very difficult to conceive.

As in Mathematicks so in Natural Philosophy the investigation of \difficult/ things \ought {illeg} to proceede/ by Analysis ought ever to precede the Composition ought ever to precede their Composition. In the two first Books I proceeded by Analysis to discover & prove several pro the original differences of the rays of light in respect of their refrangibility reflexibility & colour & their \alternate/ fits of {illeg} easy reflexion & easy transmission & the properties of bodies \both opake & pellucid/ on wch their colours depend: & these discoverys being proved may be assumed as Principles |in the Method of Composition| for explaing {sic} their effects phænomena arising from them: an instance of wch Method I gave in the end of the first Book |In this third Book I have only begun the Analysis of what remains to be discovered \hinting several thing{}/ about light & its effects upon the frame of Nature & leaving the hints to be examined & improved by the further experiments & observations of such as are curious \inquisitive./. And because the knowledge of the degrees of heat may be of use in making & reporting some sorts of experiments relating to this matter, I shall conclude with \add/ the following Question.|

All these things being considered it seems to me that God [Deus O. M.] in the beginning created matter in hard solid hard impenetrable moveable |massy| particles of such sizes & figures, & with such other properties, & in such proportion to space as most conduced to the end for wch he created them. |And| T|t|hat these original particles being solids are incomparably harder then \any/ porous bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to weare or break in pieces; no ordinary {illeg} power being able {illeg} to divide what God himself made one in the first creation. While these particles continue entire they may compound bodies of one & the same \like/ nature in all ages & texture in all ages; but should they weare or break in pieces, the nature of things depending on them would be changed. Water & Earth composed of old worn particles & fragments of particles would not be of the same nature & texture now with water & earth composed of entire particles in the beginning2 < insertion from f 242v > 2 It seems to me also \further/ yt these particles have not only a Vis inertiæ accompanied wth such \passive/ Laws of motion as \naturaly/ result from these \that force/, but also that they are endued wth certain active Princib|p|les of motions such as is that of gravity & that wch causes fermentation & the cohed|s|ion of bodies. These principles I consider not as the occult Qualities resulting from the particular \specific/ forms of things, but as the general laws of Nature from whence the forms themselves result. To tell us that every species of things is endowed with an occult quality by wch it acts is to tell us nothing, but to \dening two or three general laws \Principles/ of motion from Phænomena & afterwards to tell us {sic}/ tell us how the properties & actions of all corporeal things follow from those {uniform} general Laws Principles would be a very great step in Philosophy tho the causes of those Principles were not yet discovered \yet {illeg} discovered/, & therefore I sinple not to propose the Principles \of force & motion/ above mentioned.

Now by the intervention \help/ of these Principles \of force & motion/ all material things seem to have been composed of the pa \hard &/ solid particles above mentioned variously associated \in the first creation/, but not wthout the help help of a inter counsel & of an intelligent Agent. For it became him who created them to set them in order < text from f 242r resumes > . Of these \solid/ particles all material things seem to have been composed in the first creation, but not without the intervention of an intelligent Agent. For it became him who created them, to set them in order. And if he did so, its unphilosophical to seek for any other origin of the world, or to pretend that it might arise out of Chaos by the mere laws of nature \tho being once formed it may continue {illeg} by those laws for many ages./. For while Comets move in very excentrick orbs in all manner of positions, blind fate could never make all the Planets move one & the same way in orbs concentrick6. This uniformity must be allowed the effect of choise. And so the first contrivance of the eyes, ears, \brain,/ heart, \lungs, hands, wings,swimming {bodies}/ & other organs of <242v> sense & motion in animals \& the || instinct of brutes & insects/ can be the effect of nothing else in animals then the wisdome & skill of a powerfull ever living Agent who being indivisibly in |all places after some such manner| all places \as that wch thinks in us is in or sensorium all parts of our sensorium,/ perceives all things \accurately/ in their true solid dimensions by the immediate presence of the things themselves more \in his sensorium/ while that which thinks in us perceives only the superficial pictures of things made in our sensorium by motion; & who is more able by his will to move alter & reform the parts of the Universe |forme move the bodies in his sensorium & |& thereby| to form & reform the parts of the Universe| then we are by or ours to move or \own/ bodies. And since space is divisible in infinitum & matter is not necessarily in all places, it must be also allowed that God is able to |of {sic}| create matter in several parts of ye Unive particles of matter of several sizes & figures & in several proportions to space & in several parts of the Universe & thereby to vary the Laws of Nature, & make worlds of different sorts in several parts of ye Universe.

The business of Experimental Philosophy is only to find out by experience & observation not how things were created but what is the present frame of Nature. This enquiry should proceed not \first/ by Analysis in arguing \from things more known to things less known from things sensible to & particularly/ from effects to causes & from compositions to their ingredients. And when we have found the Principles \out & established any \new/ causes or ingredients of things/ we may proceed by Synthesis from these \those causes as ingredients as/ Principles to explain their effects & compositions. Of this Method I gave an instance in the first book of these Opticks, investigating first by Analysis the d original differences of the rays in respect of refrangibility reflexibility & colours & then from these \differences {illeg} considered as/ principles compounding explications of the colours of the made by Prisms, the colours of the Rainbow & those of natural bodies. I {illeg} Most of the second Book was written some years after \before/ the First & so is not in so good a method. However it proceeds by Analysis to discover the fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission of the rays, & from thence \its easy to compound/ the explication of the colours of \{illeg}les & other/ then transparent plates, & {illeg} \those of/ feathers & tinctures \are easily compounded./. In this third Book I have only begun the Analysis of what remains to be discovered about light, hinting several things about its nature & effects & leaving the hints to be examined corrected & improved by others the further experiments & observations of such as are curious, till some further Principles shall be disc{illeg} established by wch & the explication of their effects compounded. And by pursuing this method to|i|ll we come to as clear & full a knowledge of the first cause as we can expect from Phænomena, Natural Philosophy will be perfected, & a good foundation will be laid for enlarging the bounds of Moral Philosophy. Fo

<243r>

All bodies seem to be composed of hard particles. for otherwise fluids would not congeale as water, Byles, \vinegre & spirit or/ oyle of Vitriol, & spirit of Nitre do by freezing, Mercury by fumes of Lead, & \Spirit of Nitre & Spirit of Mercury by dissolving ye Mercury & evaporating the flegm,/ spirit of wine & Spirit of Urin by mixing & spirit of Urin & spirit of salt by compounding \subliming to {illeg} make/ salarmoniac. Even the rays of light are seem to be hard bodies for otherwise they would not retain different properties in their different sides. And thefefore hardness may be recconed the property of all uncompounded matter. I say uncompounded because compounded matter may be soft or fluid by the sliding |& motion| of the p hard particles amongst one another. But \as/ for uncompounded matter there seems to be the same evidence of its hardness as of its impenetrability: wch evidence is |For we account {illeg} \matter/ impenetrable| only th{illeg} but \because/ we find it so \by experience/ in all bodies in wch we can try experiments. [And that nothing \{composition}/ is to be admitted in experimental Philosophy but what can be derived from experiments] Now if bodies simple b And if compound bodies \{illeg}/ are so very hard as we find many of them \to be/ & yet consist of are very porous & consist of parts wch are only layed together, the simple bodies wch are void of pores & were never yet divided, into parts must be much harder. Now such \hard/ bodies being heaped up together can only \scarce/ touch one another only in points in more then points. And how bodies wch touch only in points can stick together by their own power without attract{ion} is very difficult to conceive |without the assistance of something {illeg} wch causes thē to \be/ attracted or prest towards| one another is very difficult to conceive.

And by pursuing this method \in other things as well as in light/ we may hope by degrees by degrees to discover more & more \of/ the causes & compositions \explications/ of things \& to put the discoveries out of dispute/ till we come to as clear & full a knowledge of the \vey {sic}/ first cause as we can expect from phænomena. And thereby \we shal/ not only perfect Natural Philosophy but also {illeg} enlarge the bounds of Moral Philosophy, by founding \establishing/ upon the clear light of Nature the worship of a Deity as well as the love of or Neighbour.

All these things being considered, it seems to me that {illeg} Deus O. M. in ye beginning \without any compulsion or necessity)/ created {illeg} matter in \(consisting of/ hard & solid \& {illeg} impenetrable \moveable & {illeg}/ {illeg}/ particles of such {illeg} sizes \&/ figuers {sic} & with such {illeg} other properties & in such proportion to space as most conduced to the ends for wch he created them. [That these particles are so very hard as never to weare or break in pieces, for should they were or break for while they continue entire they will be \For what power/ |no ordinary power being able to divide what God himself the power of God himself {illeg} made one in ye fir creation. For While these particles continue entire they wil be | fit to compound bodies of \one &/ the same nature \& texture/ in all ages, but should they weare or break in pieces the nature of things depending on them would be changed. Water & Earth \now/ composed now of entire particles \old/ worn particles & p fragments of particles would not be the same as in the beginning of the same kind & composition as in the beginning \nature & texture \now/ with/ water & earth composed of entire particles in the beginning. Of these particles all \material/ things seem to have been composed in the beginning \first creation/ but not without the intervention of an intelligent Agent. |For it became him that created them to set them in order . And if he did so, its unphilosophical to seek for any other origin of the world or to pretend that it would might arise out of a {illeg} Chaos by the mere laws of Nature. [which cannot be others then they {illeg} the earth {illeg} Planets {illeg} all| For while Comets move in very excentrick Orbs situated in all manner of positions, blind fate could never make the orbs of all the Planets move one & ye same way in orbs \concentric/. This \uniformity/ must be allowed as a matter of choise the effect of choise. And so the \first/ contrivance of the eyes {h} eyes ears \heart {illeg}/ & other organs of sence & motion in animals must be can be the effect of nothing else then \the/ wisdome & skill of a powerful \ever living/ Agent who being indivisibly in all places peceives {sic} all things \in their \{more}/ solid dimensions/ by {their} \the/ immediate presence \of the things themselves/ more perfectly than that which thinks in us perceives {illeg} only the \superficial/ pictures of things \made/ in {illeg} its \our/ sensorium \by motion/, & \& who is {sic}/ is more able to move, & govern \by his will to move alter & reform/ them then {illeg} we are \by ors/ to move \{illeg}/ or bodies. [{illeg}animals of all sorts & man himself without any other further need of a Deity then to {illeg} preserve matter & a certain quantity of motion |The business of Experimental Philosophy is only to find out by experience & Observation \not how things were created but/ what are is the| present frame of nature. & how her spe This {illeg} inquiry must {illeg} proceed by Ana first by Analysis in arguing from effects to causes & from compositions to components \ingredients/. And when we have found \the principles/ [the causes {illeg} \& components \ingredients/ of things we may/ proceed by Composition |Synthesis| \I have now {illeg}/ from those Principles \to explain the things/ of this method I gave instances in the two first books. {illeg} \proceeding first by Resolution & then by composition/ But {th} in this third Book I have only begun the Analysis of what remains to be deter found out & discovered, & proved \hinting several things here/ about the nature of light & its effects upon the frame of Nature, & leaving the hints to be examined \& improved/ by the further experiments & observations of such as are curious. before And because the knowledge of the degrees of heat may sometimes be of use in making & reporting {illeg} \some sorts of/ Experiments of this kind \relating to this matter/ I subjoyned a shal conclude with the following Question.

<243v>

The air in wch we breath resists about 10000 times less then quicksilver &if quuicksilver {illeg} the vacuum resistance in a glass well emptied of air should be but two hundred times less then that of ye \open/ air it would be two millions of times less then that of quicksilver. And in ye heavens it would \be/ still much less, there being exp of rarefying \airs/ above {illeg} 8000 times. And therefore the Vis inertiæ f{illeg} of ye matter in the heavens is \much/ above 800 2000000 of times less yn that of quicksilver. &

The Peripateticks in their Ph

Some Philosophers {illeg} be {still} {illeg} should be For these particles I reccon to be hard solid least

I reccon these \the least in nature least {matter}/ particles hard \to be/ solid, {illeg} \least/ compound bodies \compounded of them/ should be porous in infinitum [I reccon them the least in Nature least matter should be actually divided in infinitum &] I reccon them \to be/ hard & heavy as well, as impenetrable because I meet wth equal evidence for all three \Qualities/. For we have no \other/ evidence For their being {illeg} impenetrable but {illeg} experience in in {sic} all the bodies we can \are able to/ examin, & we have the same evidence for their being hard & \are \found/ hard or {illeg} may be < insertion from higher up f 243v > ‡ capable of being hardned. < text from f 243v resumes > hardened {sic} & \they/ are also found/ heavy. I reccon All /sensible\ bodies here below are \or may be {hard}/ heavy towards ye Earth in proportion to the quantity of matter in \each of/ them. Their gravity \in proportion to their matter/ is not intended or remitted \in the same region of the earth by any variety of \forms// & therefore it cannot be taken away And \I speak of bodies equally distant from ye center of the earth/ the by the motions of the celestial bodies it appeares that those \bodies/ are also heavy & gravitate towards one another in proportion to the matter in each wch is an argument for universa The whole tenour of experience & observation (wch is very large \& without any exception/) makes for these qualities, without any exception that I know of \& is without any exception/ [& experimential \all sound/ Philosophy {illeg} must be \{illeg} ought to be/ bounded by experience & {illeg} & strict \true/ reasoning from phænomena, or \& from/ at least from the analogy of what we find in Nature & |ye| course of Nature] & if the whole course of a large experience is not a sufficient argument the whole cour \universal/ impenetrability of matter may be.] When \For/ We have the whole course of a large experience for the universal gravity & hardness of this {part} of matter & \for/ ye hardness of its particles \without any instance to the contrary/ & we have nothing more the for its universal impenetrability. These particles \being solid/ seem to be so \very/ hard as as {sic} never to wear or break in pieces no ordinary power being able to divide what the almighty power of God \himself/ made one in the first creation. While these particles continue entire they will {were} be |remain| fit \in all ages/ to compound bodies of \one &/ the same nature & texture \in all ages/ but should they weare or

so that the resistance seems \still/ to decrease in the same proportion with the density of the {illeg} resisting fluid. For I do not find by any experiments that bodies moving in air wit Quicksilver water & air meet with any other \sensible/ resistance then what arizes from the denisity {sic} & tenacity of those \sensible/ fluids. I [Now ye air in wch we breath has been rarefied abou is about {illeg} 11000 times rarer then quicksilver & may be rarefied eight or ten thousand times by drawing it out of glass-vessels as Mr Boyle has shewed. And the heavens above the Moon are \much/ emptier of air then any vacuum we can make] |Now| If the resistance in a vessel well emptied of air was but 100 times less then in ye open air it would be about a million of times less then in quicksilver. & But it seems to be still much less \in such a vessel especialy & still much less/ in the heavens above the orb of the Moon. For Mr Boyle has shewed that it|Air| may be rarefied eight or ten thousand times & {illeg} the heavens it is much rarer then we can m \may be accounted/ are \are much/ emptier of air then any vacuum we can make below [& so t \therefore/ have \much/ less resistance then & by aris then any \such/ vacuum, we can make below & by consequence, to be \are very/ much above a million of times rarer \& emptier of matter/ then quicksilver.] For since \the air is comprest by ye weight of ye incumbt atmosphere &/ the density of air is proportional to ye force compressing it it follows by computation that at ye height of seven miles from ye earth ye {illeg} air is half as dense as \twice rarer then/ at ye surface of ye earth & at ye hight of 14 miles it is a qua four times rarer then at ye surface \of ye earth/ & at ye height of 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70 miles it is 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 124 1024 it is times rarer of thereabouts & at the height of 140, 210, 280, 350, 4{illeg} miles it is about 1000000, 1000000000, 1000000000000 times rarer & so on

‡ Bodies are therefore resisted in the heavens much less then in any Vacuum we can make below ✝ < insertion from f 244v > that is much above a million of times less then in Quicksilver & by consequence \the heavens/ are very much above a million of times rarer & emptier of matter then any suc Quicks] & therefore are much emptier < text from f 243v resumes >

Heat makes many bodies fluid wch are not fluid in cold & increases ye fluidity of tenacious fluids as of liquid \{illeg} &/ basams \2/ & oyles, but it increases not ye fluidity of water o & thereby decreases that par their resistance: but it decreases not the resistance of water considerably as it would do

Qu. 24. What are the degrees of heat by wch bodies emitt light

<244r>

Qu. 24 What are the degrees of heat requisite for the {illeg} ye emission of light & wch may be mutually produced by light?

This will be best understood by the following Table

For sulphureous steams ascend frequently out of ye bowels of the earth & the Air abound with {Nitrous} acids \fit to promote fermentation/ as may be peceived by the rusting of iron & copper in it & by the kindling of fire wth a pair of Bellows, & by the dependence of the beating of the heart upon respiration.

And even the gross body of Sulphur beaten into pouder {sic} & with an equal weight of iron filings & a little water made into a past, acts upon the iron & in four or five hours grows too hot to be touched & emits a flame. And by \these experiments \compared with/ the warmth of the interior earth &/ hot springs, burning mountains, \damps/ earthquakes, \hot suffocating exhalations/ Hurricanes & spouts & thunder & lighting we may learn that that {sic} sulphureous steams abound in the bowels of the earth \{sic} {Orbits}/ & ferment with minerals &

Qu. 25. Are not the rays \particles/ of light hard bodies & do \do/ not all sensible bodies consist of hard particles.

ascending into ye air sometimes take fire & wth \a great/ explosion \& shaking of the earth/ burst the caverns in wch they are sent up & \{sic} then the vapor {illeg} by the explosion/ ex{pirength} through the pores of & earth feels hot & suffocates man or makes ye sea {bogle} \& makes {illeg} Tempests & Hurricanes & causes the sea to bogle & land to glide \or sink/ & ye sea to bogle/ & carrys up the water \thereof/ in drops & thick {masses} wch convening {above} |wth their weight| fall down again in spouts. & that at all times that these {drops} \Also \some/ sulphur\eous/ steams/ at all times when the earth is dry asend \ascending/ into ye air & there ferment \there/ wth nitrous acids & th till {take} & sometimes taking fire cause lighting & thunder. For the air abounds with \{illeg}/ acid vapors wch promote \fit to promote/ fermenit|tatio||ns| sulphur, as appears by \the rusting of iron the coper in it & the/the {sic} {illeg} kindling of fire wth a pair of Bellows & by the dependence of ye beating of the heart |by blowing & by the dependence of the beating of the heart upon respiration.| And {will}

[‡ Nod|w| all these \the above mentioned/ motions are too \so/ great & violent to cause \to be/ as to shew that \in fermentations/ there is new motion in the world generated from other Principles then the usual laws of motion.] Now the above mentioned motions are so great & violent as to shew that in fermentations bodies \wch rest|alm|ost rest/ are put into \new/ motions by a much more potent principle that|en| those laws of motio the Vis ine the laws of motion {&} the Vis inertiæ of the matter [& that by this principle new motions] & |very potent \active/ Principle Principle wch is much more potent then the| which acts upon bodies \them/ only when they approach one another, {illeg} [& wch is much more potent then are the pass passive laws of motion arising from the Vis inertiæ of the matter.]

It seems therefore that God has \Deus O. M. in the beginning/ created the \hard hard/ particles of \hard/ matter of such sizes & figurs|re|s & with such other properties & in such a quantity |in proportion to space| as most conduced to ye ends for wch they were created, & of these variously convening & moveing amongst one another has formed the Universe {in} corporeal {part} |of ye| Univers: & that the various changes which forms \& changes/ wch matter dayly puts on \undergoes/ consists only in the various separations & {concretions} \coalitions & separations/ of these particles while ye particles themselves continue unchanged being too hard to be broken by one entire as they were at first created \& unaltered/ no \ordinary/ power in nature being able to divide what God {illeg} \himself/ united in the first creation. While these particles continue entire corporeal nature may continue the same, \& produce the same sorts of fluids & solids in all all|g|es/ but should these be broken into less particles, the nature of things would be altered. For these \broken/ particles would scarce \{move} &/ convene \& stick together/ any more in the same \manner &/ form{s} as \they do/ at present, unless \re/united {anew} by a divine power.

I have hitherto proceeded \in this Book/ by way of Analysis, arguing from effects to causes & from compound bodies to their ingredients. In the two first Books I proceeded \first/ by Analysis in searching into ye different refrangibility of the rays & the corresponding colours of light & then from those Principles compounded the explications of the colours of light refracted by Prisms \those/ of the Rainbow & \those/ of Natural bodies. In the second Book I proceed|ed| by Analysis in {illeg} searching oout the fits of easy Reflexion & easy transmission of the rays of light, & then from this Principle compounded a further explication of the colours of {illeg} natural bodies & of the constitution of those bodies requisite for making those The subject of those two books is complein <244v> but that of this third Book is very incomplete. Much remains to be discovered concerning the nature of Light & fire, much more concerning the nature of fire & other{s} bodies wch emit reflect, & refract & inflect & & stifle it & concerning |ye| heat, & motion \& powers of bodies/ by wch it is emitted reflected reflected {illeg} refracted inflected & stifled. Many experiments are wanting for completing the Analysis of this part of Nature & coming to a clear \& distinct/ knowledge of \all/ ye causes of these things, many more for perfecting the Analysis of all Nature & establishing the making a full & clear discovery of all the first Principles of Natural Philosophy. And yet To compass this is a work wch requires many heads & hands & a long time & yet this ought to be done before we proceed from the first Principles by Composition to explain {all} Nature.

some small \inconsiderable/ irregularities excepted wch may have risen from the {illeg} mutual actions of Comets & Planets upon one another & wch will be apt to increase till this systeme wants a reformation. This \Such a wonderfull/ uniformity of \in/ the Planetary Systeme must be allowed the effect of choise. And so must the uniformity in the bodies of animal, they having generaly a right side & a left side shaped alike & on either side of their bodies two leggs behind & two arms or two leggs or two wings \before/ upon their sho\u/lders & between their shoulders a neck with a head upon it & in the head two ears, two eyes, a nose, & a mouth, alike situated \&/ a tongue & teeth alike situated.

— — —Moral Philosophy. For when \if/ we {illeg}\see/ clearely by the light of Nature that there is a God, we shall see \clearly/ by the same light of Nature that he is to be feared & {illeg} praised thanked & worshipped with {illeg} wth fit expressions of gratitude for the benefits we receive wth gratitude & supplication \acknowledged feared honoured {sic}/ & adored.

This Analysis consists in arguing from {illeg} phænomena to their causes & compositions & from compositions to ingredients, {illeg} \&/ from motions to the forces producing them & in general from phænomena to their causes, & from immediate particular causes to more general ones |till the|to| {come} at the most general argument end in the most general.| The Synthesis in assuming the causes discovered & established as principles of Philophy {sic} & from them {expl} explaining the Phænomena proceeding from them & proving the Explanations. In the two first Books \of these Opticks/ I proceeded — — — — inquisitive. And if \Natural Philosophy in all its parts/ by pursuing this method Natural Philosophy shall at length be perfected, the bounds of Moral Philosophy will be also enlarged by founding the worship of the first cause upon the light clearest light of Nature For when we know \so far as we shall \can/ know by Natural Philosophy what/ what dependence {illeg} power the first cause has over us & what benefits we \{illeg}/ receive or may hope for f \or may expect/ from him, \so far/ our duty towards him as well as \that/ towards one another will |so far| appear to us by the clear light of nature. And no doubt, if the worship of fals Gods had not blinded the Heathens, their Moral Philosophy would have gone further then to the four Cardinal Vertues, & instead of teaching us to worship the Sun & Moon & dead mens Souls, they would that tought us the |to| worship of or great \true/ Benefactor

These {illeg} Principles I consider \forces are to be {illeg} considered here/ not as occult Qualities wch arise from the \specific/ forms of things but as general Principles by wch the things themselves are formed; & whose {illeg} wch arise from causes not yet enquired into explained & whose truth appeares to us us {sic} but whose causes & wch appear to us to be true, but whose causes are not yet explained] their truth appearing to us \Phænomena,/, tho their causes be not yet explained.

<245r>

|thence| it may understood that the parts of all fusible bodies stick together \as well/ in a slate of fusion as well as in a slate of hardness congelation.

Now the smallest particles of matter

Whence its easy to understand that what ever cause makes the parts of \ice & other hard/ bodies stick together in a slate of firmnes the same cause will make them stick together when they are bodies are melted, & tho perhaps not so firmly. For in fusion the parts of bodies are in a motion \of sliding/ amongst{s} themselves. & slide upon one another

And so sulphureous & nitrous spirits meeting in the air ferment with violence & make thunder & lightning.

If equal weights of sulphur poudered & iron filings be make into a past with a little water, though both ye ingredients be dry bodies they indissolvable in \the/ water yet they act upon one another & in five four or five hours grow too hot to be touched & \soon after/ emit a flame. And thence it may be understood that ye sulphureous steams wch abound in ye bowels of ye earth meeting wth fit matter may cause great fermentations \below & heat mineral waters/ set mountains on fire & getting out into the air may ferment |& flash with| the acids there & its t{illeg}|h|ey meets with there \for causing thunder & lightning/. For the air abounds wth nitrous acids wch are very apt to inflame sulphurs|eous| exhalations as be seen by blowing a fire

world. Some other Principle was necessary for putting bodies into motion & after \now/ they were \are/ in motion some other Principle is necessary for conserving the motion. For from the various composition of motion — — — warms all things by the light, |Mountains take fire| & the inward parts of the earth are constantly warmed & send up \generate hot/ sulphureous |healthful| steams \exhalations/ which breaking forth with violence cause earthquakes \& tempests/ & hurricanes, & |raise or subvert \Islands &/ mountains & sink lakes &| carry up the sea in spouts \columns/ & in drops \& thick mists/ wch convening above fall down in other |again in| spouts. & \{illeg}/ fill the air with unhealthfull {illeg} steams, &

<245v>

Why ye Barometer stand 60 or 80 inches high.

Why sup|l|phur & iron g\r/ow hot & fire & whence Earthquakes Hurricanes & Spouts.

Air promotes ye burning of sulphureous bodies & therefore apt to make \ferment/ suphureous {sic} vapors for causing Thunder & lightning.

The same thing I infer also \from the cohering of two polished marbles in Vacuo &/ from ye standing of Mercury {well at} in ye barometer at the height of above \above/ 40 or 60 or 70 inches {illeg} vided \or above when ever/ it be \is/ will purged of air & carefully poured in so that its {illeg} parts, be every where contiguous both to one another & to the glass. Some imagin that the Marbles are prest together by an ambient æther | Mercury is prest up into the {illeg} Tube by the \ambient same/ Ethereal Medium wch is much subtile then air & \yet/ cannot {permeat} pass through the quicksilver. But if this \æther/ can pass through \either the Quicksilver or/ the glass it will not {buy} buoy up the Quicksilver \Mercury/, & if it cannot pass the glass the quicksilver \through neither of them/ \then Mercury/ will not subside, as it doth when the glass is knocked to make the quicksilver {part} from it or \when/ the quicksilver hath any bubbles in it wch hinder the contact & cohesion of its parts. {illeg} The like experimt hath been tried with water well purged from Air. And therefore the parts of water & Quicksilver adhere to one another & to the glasses by a mutual attraction. If water be congealed by freezing or quicksilver by the fumes of Lead or by being fried in a frying pan with Virdegris, the parts of the congealed fluid stick together so as to compose a hard body: & this experimt of ye Barometer shews that they stick together \also/ in a fluid state as well as in a conge{led} one. And then

Nam calores quos Thermometer calefacta

Thermo\me/ter {illeg} \prima vice/ in calescendo prima vice crepebat\uit/ tanquam si vitrum frangeretur at \crepitus/ post horas tres vel quatuor cessa{illeg}\runt/ & Thermometer luto obteclas calorem stanni liquaq|ef|acti per{illeg}tulit, Deinde in loco frigido posita temporibus {illeg} æqualibus calores amisit in proportione geometrica. Sia et calores quos ferrum candens in loco frigido positum temporibus æqualibus amisit erant in ratione geometrica et inde innotuere per tabular per Tabulam Logarithmorum.

<246r>

the matter nor by any other means then by decreasing the density into smaller parts & making the parts more smooth & slippery: but that part of the resistance wch arises from the Vis inertiæ is proportional to the density of the matter \cæteris paribus/ & cannot be diminished by dividing the matter nor by any other means then by decreasing the density. And for these reasons the density of fluid Mediums is very nearly proportional to their resistance. Liquors which differ not much in density, as water, spirit of vine, spirit of turpentine, hot oyle, differ not much in resistance. Water is thirteen or fourteen times lighter then quicksilver & by consequence 13 or 14 times rarer, & its resistance is less then that of quicksilver in the same proportion or thereabouts, as I have found by experiments made with Pendulums. The open Air in which we breath is eight or nine hundred times lighter then water, & by consequence eight or nine hundred times rarer, & accordingly its resistance is less then that of water in the same proportion or thereabouts, as I have also f{illeg}d \found/ by experiments made with pendulums; & in thinner Air the resistance is still less & at length by rarefying the Air becomes insensible. For \small/ feathers falling in the open air meet with great resistance but in a tall glass well emptied of air they fall as fast as lead or gold as I have seen tried several times. And the heavens \above the Moon/ are emptier of air then any vacuum we can make below & therefore have less resistance Whence the resistance seems still to decrease in proportion to the density of the fluid. For I do not find by any experiments that bodies moving in Quicksilver Water or Air meet with any other sensible resistance then what arizes from the density & tenacity of those sensible fluids \as they would do if the pores of those fluids \& all other spaces/ were pervaded by a more subtile resisting fluid./. Now if the resistence in a vessel well emptied of Air was but an hundred times less then in the open Air it would be about a million of times less then in quicksilver. But it seems to be much less in such a vessel & still much less in the heavens at the height of three or four hundred miles from ye earth or above. For Mr Boyle has shewed that Air may be rarified above ten thousand times in vessels of glass; & the heavens are much emptier of air then any vacuum we can make below. For since the Air is comprest by the weight of the incumbent atmosphere & the density of Air is proportional to the force compressing it, it follows by computation that at the height of \about/ seven miles from the earth the air is twice \four times/ rarer then at the surface of the earth, & at the height of 14 miles it is four \sixteen/ times rarer then at the surface of the earth; & \at/ the height of 21, 28, \or/ 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, & \or/ 70 miles it is \respectively/ 6{4}, 256, \or/ 1024, 4096, |16384| 128, 256, 512, \or/ 1024 times rarer or thereabouts; & at the height of \70,/ 140, \or/ 210, \or/ {280} miles it is about 1000000, 1000000000, or 1000000000000 \or 1000000000000000000/ times rarer, & so on.

Heat promotes fluidity very much by diminishing the tenacity of bodies. It makes many bodies fluid wch are not fluid in cold & increases the fluidity of tenacious liquids as of o|O|yle Balsam & Honey, & thereby decreases their resistance.{illeg} But it decreases not the resistance of water considerably as it would do if any great \considerable/ part of the resistance of water arose from the attrition or tenacity of its parts And therefore the resistence of water arises chiefly \almost entirely/ from the Vis inertiæ of its matter: & by consequence, if the heavens were as dense as water they would not have much less resistence then water; if as dense as quicksilver they would not have much less resistence then quicksilver; if absolutely dense or full of matter without any vacuum, let the matter be never so subtile & fluid, they would have a greater resistence then quicksilver. A solid globe in such a Medium would lose above {illeg} half its motion in moving three times the length of its diameter & a globe not solid (such as are the Planets) would be retarded sooner. And therefore to make way for the lasting & regular motions of the Planets & Comets, its necessary to empty the heavens of all matter except <247r> perhaps some very thin vapors steams or effluvia arising from the Atmospheres of the Earth Planets & Comets. Such matter is \& such an ethereal Medium as we described above. A dense fluid can be/ of no use for explaining the phænomena of Nature, the motions of the Planets & Comets being better explained without it by gravity without it & gravity not being hitherto explained by it. It serves only to disturbe & retard the motions of those great bodies, & make the frame of nature languish & in the pores of bodies it serves only to stop the vibrating motions of their parts wherein their heat & activity consists. And as it is of no use & hinders the operations of Nature & makes her languish, so there is no evidence for its existence & therefore it ought to be rejected. And if it be rejected, the Hypotheses that light consists in pression or motion propagated through such a Medium are rejected with it. And for rejecting such a Medium we have the authority of those the oldest & most celebrated Philosophers of Greece & Phenicia who made a Vacuum, Atoms & the gravity of Atoms the first Principles of their Philosophy; tacitely attributing gravity to some other cause then dense matter \or mechanism/. Later Philosophers banish the consideration of such a cause \other causes/ |then mechanism| out of natural Philosophy, framing Hypotheses for explaing {sic} all things mechanically & referring other causes to Metaphysicks: whereas the main business of natural Philosophy is to argue from Phænomena without feigning Hypotheses & to deduce causes from effects till we come to the very first cause \which certainly is not mechanical;/{sic} & not only to unfold the mechanism of the world but chiefly to resolve these & such like questions. What is there in places almost empty of matter, & whence is it that the Sun & Planets gravitate towards one another without dense matter between them? Whence is it that Nature doth nothing in vain & whence arises all that beauty that we see in the world? To what end are Comets, & whence is it that they move all manner of ways in orbs Planets move all one & the same way in orbs concentric while Comets move all manner of ways in Orbs very excentrick; & what hinders the fixt Stars from falling upon one another? How come the bodies of animals to be contrived with so much art, & for what ends were their severall parts? Was the eye contrived without skill in Opticks & the ear without the knowledge of sounds? How do the motions of the body follow from the will, & whence is the instinct in animals? Is not the sensory of animal that place to which the sensitive substance is present, & into which the sensible species of things are carried through the nerves & brain that there they may be perceived by their immediate presence to that substance? And these things being rightly determined, dispatcht, d|D|oes it not appear from phænomena that there is a Being incorporeal living intellingent {sic} omnipresent, who in infinite space as it were in his sensory, sees the things themselves intimately, & throughly perceives them, & comprehends them wholy by their immediate presence to himself; of wch things the images only carried through the organs of sense to it self, that wch in us perceives & thinks, sees & beholds in its little sensorium. And tho every true step made in this Philosophy brings us not e|i|mmediately to the knowledge of the first cause, yet it brings us nearer to it, & on that account is to be highly valued.

<249bis-r>

— tacitely attributing gravity to some other cause then \dense/ matter. the Later Philosophers banish the consideration of this \the supreme/ cause out of natural Philosophy framing Hypotheses for explaining all things without it & referring it to Meph Metaphysicks \that is to \abstrac/ reasoning without the help of Phenomena or reasoning in the dark/: whereas the main business of natural Philosophy is to argue from effects to causes till we come to ye very first cause, & not only to unfold the mechanim of the world but chiefly to resolve these & such like questions What is there in places \almost/ empty of matter & whence is it that the Sun & Planets gravitate towards one another without \dense/ matter between them? Whence is it that Nature does nothing in vain {illeg} ? And whence arises all that beauty that we see in ye world? |To wt end are Comets & whence is it that they move all manner of ways in Orbs very excentric & Planets all one way in {obs} concentric, & what hinders the fixt stars from falling upon one another?| How come the bodies of animals to be contrived with so much art? & for what ends were their several parts? Was ye eye contrived without skill in Opticks & ye ear without the knowledge of sounds? To what end are Comets{sic} \whence is it that their Orbs are very eccentrical & those of Planets concentrical?/ & what hinders the fixt stars from falling upon one another. \& how do ye motions of the body follow from ye will & whence is the instinct in animals?/ And tho every true step made in this Philosophy brings us not immediately to the first cause knowledge of the first cause yet it brings us nearer to it & on that account is to be highly valued.

<248r>

Qu 23. Have not the small partciles of bodies certain powers virtues or forces by wch they act at a distance not only upon the rays of light for reflecting refracting & inflecting them but also upon one another for producing a great part of ye phænomena of nature? [For it has been shewed that bodies act upon the rays of light at a distance in refracting reflecting & inflecting them, & by the phænomena of Island Crystal it appears that some bodies act upon light by two sorts of powers one of wch is an usual & an unusual one, the last of wch is something like magnetical attraction. That we may find out by what powers bodies act on light at a distance I have propounded this Question for {fending} all the powers by wch the particles of bodies act on|at| on|a| distance on one another]. For its well known that they \bodies/ act one upon another by the attractions of gravity magnetism & electricity & these instances shew the course \& tenour/ of nature & make it not improbable but that there may be more attractive powers then these. These powers reach to very sensible distances |& so have been observed by vulgar eyes,| & there may be others wch reach to so small distances as hitherto to escape observation. {sic} \/ < insertion from f 248v > \Or that bodies may act at very small distances act by electricall attraction even witout {sic} friction/ For Nature is very consonant & conformable to her self. How these attractions are or may be performed I do not here consider. What I call attraction may be performed by impulse or by some other means unknown to me. I use that word here to signify only in general any force by wch bodies tend towards one another whatever be the cause. For we must learn from the phænomena of Nature what bodies {do} attract one another {at a} & what are the laws & properties of the attractios before we enquire the cause by wch the attraction is performed. The attractions of gravity magnetism & electricity reach to very sensible distances & so have been observed by vulgar eyes & there may be others wch reach to so small distances as hitherto to escape observations, |& perhaps electrical attraction may reacl {sic} to small distances \even/ without being excited by friction.|

For when salt of Tartar runs — — — — < text from f 248r resumes >

For when salt of Tartar runs per deliquium is not this done by an attraction between the particles of the salt of Tartar & the particles of water wch float in the air in the form of vapors? And why does not common salt or saltpeter or vitriol run per deliquium but for want of such an attraction? Or why does not salt of Tartar draw more water out of the air then in a certain proportion to its quantity, but for want of an attractive force after it is satiated with water? And whence is it but from this attractive power that water wch alone distills with a gentle lukewarm heat will not destill from salt of Tartar without a great heat? And is it not from the like attractive power between the particles of oyle of Vitriol & the particles of water that Oyle of Vitriol draws to it a good quantity of water out of the air, & after it is satiated draws no more, & in destillation lets go the water very difficultly? And when water & oyle of Vitriol poured successively into the same vessel grow very hot in the mixing, does not this heat argue a great motion in the liquor parts of the liquors? & does not this motion argue that the parts of the two liquors in mixing coalesce with violence & by consequence rush towards one another \with an accelerated motion/. And when Aqua fortis or Spirit of Vitriol poured upon filings of iron dissolve the filings with a great heat & ebullition {illeg} is not this heat & ebullition effected by a violent motion of the parts & does not that motion argue that the acid parts of the liquor rush towards the parts of the metal with viloence, & run forcibly into its pores till they get round its outward particles between its \outmost/ particles & the main mass of ye metal & surrounding those particles \loosen them from the main mass &/ set them at liberty to flote off from the main mass into ye water? And when the acid particles wch alone would destill with an easy heat will not separate from the particles of the metal without a very violent heat does not this confirm the attraction between them?

When salt of Tartar per deliquium being poured into the solution of any metal precipitates the metal & makes it fall down to the bottom of the liquor in the form of mud, does not this argue that the acid particles are attracted more strongly by the salt of Tartar then by the metal & by the stronger attraction go from the metal to the salt of Tartar? And so when a solution of copper in Aqua fortis dissolves \dissolves {sic} the Lapis Calaminasis & lets go the iron or a solution of Copper dissolves/ iron immersed in it & lets go the copper, or solution of Silver dissolves Copper & lets go the silver <249r> or a solution of Mercury in aqua fortis being poured upon iron copper tin or lead dissolves the metal & lets go the Mercury, does not this argue that the acid particles of the Aqua fortis are attracted \more strongly by the Lapis Calamiriaris then by Iron &/ more strongly by iron then by \the Lapis Calaminasis yn by/ copper & more strongly by copper then by silver & more strongly by iron, copper tin & lead then by Mercury? And is it not for the same reason that iron takes up more A requires more Aqua fortis to dissolve \& satiate/ it then copper & copper more then silver the other metals; & that of all metals iron \is/ dissolved most easily & is most apt to rust; & next after iron, copper?

When spirit of Vitriol poured upon common salt or saltpeter makes an ebullition with the salt & unites with it & in destillation the spirit of ye common salt or saltpeter comes over much easier then it would do before & the acid part of the spirit of Vitriol stays behind; does not this argue that the fixed Alcaly of the salt attracts the acid spirit of the Vitriol more strongly then its own spirit, & not being able to hold them both, lets go its own? And when oyle of Vitriol is drawn off from its weight of Nitre & from both the ingredients a mixed \compound/ spirit \of Nitre/ is destilled \two parts of/ wch being poured on \one part of/ oyle of cloves |or larvy seeds, or of any ponderous vegetable oyle or oyle of animal substances, or oyle of Turpentine thickened wth a little balsam of sulphur,| grows so \very/ hot in mixing as presently to send up a burning flame: does not this very great & sudden heat argue that the parts of the two liquors {illeg} mix with violence & that their parts in mixing run towards one another with an accelerated motion & clash with the greatest force? And is it not for the same reason \that well rectified spirit of wine poured on the said {illeg}|compound| spirit flashes &/ that the pulvis fulminans composed of sulphur Nitre & salt of Tartar goes off with a more sudden & violent explosion then Gun-powder, the acid spirits of the Sulphur & Nitre rushing towards |one another & towards| the salt of Tartar with so great a violence as by the shock to turn the whole at once into vapour & flame? Where the dissolution is slow it makes a slow ebullition |&| with a gently heat & where it is quicker it makes a greater ebullition with a gentler \more/ heat, & where it is done at once, the ebullition is contracted into a sudden blast or violent explosion with a heat equal to that of fire & flame.

{illeg} not from a mutual attraction that the spirits of soot & seasalt {illeg} sublimation {unite} & compose the particles of Solar {monta} |So when a drachm of the above mentioned compound spirit of Nitre was poured upon half a drachm of oyle of Carvi seeds in Vacuo the mixture immediately made a flash like gunpowder & burst {illeg} the exhausted Receiver wch was a glass six inches wide & eight inches deep.| And ‡

< insertion from f 248v >

‡ And so sulphureous & nitrous spirits meeting in the Air ferment \& flash/ with violence & cause thunder & lightning

‡And even the gross bo{illeg}y of Sulphur poudered & with an equal weight of iron filings & a little water made into a past, acts upon the iron & in four or five hours five or six hours grows too hot to be touched & emits a flame. And by these experiments compared with the great quantity of sulphur wth wch the earth abounds & the warmth of the interior parts of the earth & hot springs & burning mountains, & with damps \mineral corruscations/, earthquakes, hot suffocating exhalations, hurricanes & spouts; we may learn that sulphureous steams abound in the bowels of the earth & ferment with minerals & sometimes take fire with a sudden corruscation & explosion & if pent up in subterraneous caverns burst the caverns with a great shaking of the earth as in spring|ing| of a m|M|ine, & then the vapor generated by the explosion expiring through the pores of the earth feels hot & suffocates & makes tempests & hurricanes & sometimes causes the land to slide or the sea to boyle & carries up the water thereof in drops wch by their weight fall down again in spouts. Also some steams sulphureous steams, at all times when the earth is dry, ascending into the Air, ferment there with nitrous acids, & sometimes taking fire cause lightning & thunder \& fiery Meteors/. For the Air abounds with acid vapors fit to promote fermentations, as appears by the rusting of iron & copper in it, the kindling of fire by blowing, & the beating of <249v> the heart by means of respiration. Now the above mentioned motions are so great & violent as to shew that in fermentations \the particles of/ bodies wch almost rest are put into new motions by a very potent principle wch acts upon them only when they approach one another & causes them to meet & clash with great violence \& grow hot with the motion/ & dash one another into pieces & vanish into air & vapour & flame.

< text from f 249r resumes >

When Oyle of Vitriol is mixed with a little water or is run per deliquium & in destillation the water ascends difficultly & brings over with it some part of the Oyle of Vitriol in the form of spirit of Vitriol & this spirit being poured upon iron copper or salt of Tartar unites with the body & lets go the water, does not this shew that the acid spirit is attracted by the water & more attracted by the fixt body then by the water & therefore lets go the water to close with the fixt body? And is it not for the same reason that the water & acid spirits in Vinegar, Aqua fortis & Spirit of Salt cohere & rise together in destillation; but if the Menstruum be poured on salt of Tartar, or on Lead or Iron or any fixt body wch it can dissolve, the acid by a stronger attraction adheres to the body & lets go the water? And is it not also from a mutual attraction that ye spirits of soot & sea salt unite & compose the particles of Salarmoniac wch are less volatile then before because |grosser &| freer from water; & that the particles of Salarmoniac in sublimation carry up the particles of Antimony wch will not sublime alone; & that {illeg}|th|e particles of Mercury uniting with the acid particles of spirit of salt compose Mercury sublimate, & with the particles of sulphur compose cinnaber; & |yt| the particles of spirit of wine & spirit of u{illeg}|r|ine well rectified unite & letting go the water wch dissolved them compose a body consistent & almost fixed \body;/; & that in subliming cinnaber from Salt <250r> of tartar or quick lime the sulphur by a stronger attraction of the salt or lime lets go the Mercury & stays with the fixt body, & yt when Mercury sublimate is sublimed from Antimony or from Regulus of Antimony, the spirit of salt lets go the Mercury & unites wth the Antimonial metal wch attracts it more strongly & stays with it till the heat be great enough to make them both ascend together, & then carries up the metal with it in the form of a very fusible salt called butter of Antimony, although the spirit of salt alone be almost as volatile as water & the Antimony \alone/ as fixt as lead?

When Aqua fortis dissolves silver & not gold & a|A|qua regia dissolves gold & not silver may it not be said that Aqua fortis is subtile enough to penetrate Gold as well as silver but wants the attractive force to give it entrance, & that Aqua regia is subtile enough to enter \penetrate/ silver \as well as Gold/ but wants the attractive force to give it entrance. For Aqua regia is nothing else then Aqua fortis mixed with some spirit of salt or with salarmoniac & even common salt dissolved in Aqua fortis enables the menstruum to dissolve Gold tho the salt be a gross body. When therefore spirit of salt precipitates silver out of Aqua fortis is it not done by attracting & mixing with the Aqua fortis & repelling the |not attracting or peh|r|haps or perhaps repelling the| silver; & when water precipitates Antimony out of the sublimate of Antimony & Salarmoniac or out of butter of Antimony is it not done by dissolving mixing \with/ & weakning the salarmoniac or spirit of salt & repelling \not attracting or perhaps repelling/ the Antimony? And is it not from the want of an attractive vertue between the parts of water & oyle, of Quicksilver & Antimony, of Lead & Iron that these substances do not mix & by a weak attraction that quicksilver & copper mix difficultly & from a strong one that Quicksilver & Tin, Antimony & iron, water & salts mix readily? And in general, is it not from the same principle, that heat congregt|a|tes homogeneal bodies & separat{illeg}|e|s heterogeneal ones?

When Arsenick with soap gives a Regulus & with Mercury sublimate a volatile fusible salt like butter of Antimony, does not this shew that Arsenick is compounded of fixt & volatile parts strongly cohering by a mutual attraction so that the volatile will not ascend without carrying up the fixed? And so when an equal weight of spirit of wine & oyle of Vitriol are digested together & in destillation yeild two fragrant volatile spirits which will not mix with one another & a fixt black earth remains behind, doth not this shew that oyle of Vitriol is composed of volatile & fixed parts strongly united by attraction so as to ascend together in form of a volatile acid fluid salt, untill the spirit of wine attracts & separates the volatile parts from the fixed? And therefore since oyle of Sulphur per campanam is of the same nature: with oyle of Vitriol, may it not be inferred that sulphur is also a mixture of volatile & fixed parts so strongly cohering by attraction as to ascend together in sublimation. By

< insertion from f 250v >

By dissolving flowers of Sulphur {per} in oyle of Turpentine & destilling the solution, it is found that sulphur is composed of an inflammable volatile thick oyle] or \fat/ bitumen, an acid salt, a very fixt earth & a little metal. The three first were found not much unequal to one another, the fourth in so small a quantity as scarce to be worth considering. The acid salt dissolved in water is the same with oyle of sulphur per campanam, & abounding much in the bowels of the earth & particularly in Markasites, unites it self to the other ingredients of the Markasite, wch are b|B|itumen, Iron, Copper & earth & with them compounds Alume Vitriol & Sulphur. With the earth alone it compounds Alume, with the metal alone or metal & earth together it compounds Vitriol, & with the Bitumen & Earth it compounds Sulphur whence it comes to pass that Markasites abound with those three minerals. And is it not from the mutual attraction of the ingredients that they stick together for compounding these minerals, & that the Bitumen carries up the other ingredients of the sulphur, wch without it would not sublime? And the same Question may be put concerning all or almost all the gross bodies in nature. For all the parts of animals & vegetables are composed or parts|ic|les \substances/ volatile & fixed fluid & solid as appears by their Analysis, & so are salts & minerals so far as Chymists have been hitherto able to examin their composition

< text from f 250r resumes >

When Mercury sublimate \is/ |re|sublimed with fresh Mercury & becomes Mercurius dulcis wch is a white tastless earth scarce \in/ dissolvable in water, <251r> and Mercurius dulcis resublimed with spirit of salt returns into Mercury sublimate & when Metals corroded with a little acid turn into rust wch is an sort of tastless earth an earth tastless & indissolvable in water & this earth satiated imbibed with more acid become a metallic salt & when some stones, as spar of Lead, dissolved in proper menstruums become salts, does not these things shew that salts are \dry/ earth & \watry/ acid united by attraction, & that {illeg}f the earth will not become a salt without so much acid as makes it be earth dissolvable in water? And as gravity \/

< insertion from f 250v >

✝Doe not the sharp & pungent tasts of acids arise from the strong attraction whereby the acid particles rush upon & agitate the particles of the tongue? And when metalls are dissolved in acid menstruums do not the acids adhering & the metallic particles lose much of their activity & act \the acids/ in conjunction wth the metal after act after a different manner so that the compound has a different tast much milder then before & sometimes a sweet one \is it not because the acids adhere to the metallick particles & thereby lose much of their activity?/? And if the acid be in too small a proportion to make the compound dissolvable in water, will it not by adhering strongly to ye metal become unactive & lose its tast & ye compound be a tastless earth? For such things as are not dissolvable by the moisture of the tongue act not upon the tast.

As gravity makes the sea flow round < text from f 251r resumes > makes the sea flow rownd {sic} the denser & weightier parts of the globe of the earth so the attraction may make the watry acid flo{illeg}|at| round the denser & compacter particles of earth for composing the particles of salt. For otherwise the acid would not do the office of a mediator\um/ between the earth & common water for making salts dissolvable in the water nor would salt of tartar readily draw off the acid from dissolved metalls. nor \metals the acid from Mercury./ Now as in the great globe of the earth & sea the densest bodies by gravity sink down in water & always endeavour to go towards the center of the globe so in particles of salt the densest matter will always endeavour to approach the center of the particle: so that a particle of salt may be compared to a chaos, being dense hard dry & earthy in the center & {sic} rare soft moist & watry in the circumference. And hence it seems to be that salts are of a lasting nature being scarce destroyed unless by drawing away their watry parts by violence or by letting them soak into the pores of the central earth by a gentle heat in putrefaction untill the earth be dissolved by the water & separated into smaller particles wch by reason of their smalness make the rotten compound appear of a black colour. Hence also it may be that the parts of animals & vegetables preserve their several forms & assimilate their nourishment, the soft & moist nourishment easily changing its texture by a gentle heat & motion till it becomes like the dense hard dry & durable earth in the center of each particle. But when the nourishment grows unfit to be assimilated or the central earth grows too feeble to assimilate it, the motion ends in putrefaction & death.

If a very small quantity of any salt or Vitriol be dissolved in a great quantity of water the particles of the salt or Vitriol will not sink to the bottom tho they be heavier in specie then the water but will eavenly diffuse themselves into all the water so as to make it as saline at the top as at the bottom. And does not this imply that the parts of the salt or Vitriol recede from one another & endeavour to expand themselves & get as far asunder as the quantity of water will allow in wch they float? And does not this endeavour imply that they have a repulsive force by wch they fly from one another or at least that they attract the water more strongly then they do one another? For as all things ascend in water wch are less attracted then water by the gravitating power of the earth, so all |ye| particles \of salt/ wch float in water & are less attracted then water by {illeg} \any one/ particle of salt must recede from that particle & give way to the more attracted water

When any saline liquor is evaporated to a cuticle & let cool, the salt concretes in regular figures, wch argues that the particles of salt <252r> before they concreted, floated in the liquor at equal distances in rank & file & by consequence that they acted upon one another by some power wch at equal distances is equal at unequal distances unequal. For by such a power they will range themselves uniformly & without it they will float irregularly & come together as irregularly. And since the particles of Island Crystal act all the same way upon the rays of light for causing the unusual refraction, may it not be supposed that these in the formation of this crystal the particles not only ranged themselves in rank & file for concreting in regular figures but also by some kind of polar vertue turned their homogeneal sides the same way.

The parts of all homogeneal hard bodies wch fully touch one another stick together very strongly. And for explaining how this may be some have invented hooked atoms \which is begging ye question;/ & others tell us that bodies are glued together by rest |i.e. by an {illeg}h which are utterly unintelligible occult Quality, or rather by nothing, & others that they stick together by conspiring motions, that is, by rest amongst themselves.|: but I had rather infer from their cohesion that their particles attract one another by some force wch in immediate contact is exceeding strong, at small distances performs the chymical operations above mentioned & reaches not far from the particles wth any sensible effect. \Symbol (1 dotInAsterisk) in text Symbol (2 dotInAsterisk) in text/ < insertion from f 253r > All bodies seem to be composed of hard particles, for otherwise fluids would not congeale, as water, oyles, Vinegre, & spirit or oyle of Vitriol do by freezing, Mercury by fumes of Lead, Spirit of Nitre & Mercury by dissolving the Mercury & evaporating the flegm, spirit of Wine & spirit of Urine by deflegming & mixing them, & spirit of Urine & spirit of salt by subliming them together to make salarmoniac. Even the rays of light seem to be hard bodies, for otherwise they would not retain different properties in their different sides. And therefore hardness may be recconed the property of all uncompounded matter. At least this seems to be as evident as the universal impenetrability of matter. For all bodies, so far as experience reaches, are either hard or may be hardened, & we have no other evidence of universal impenetrability besides a large exp\er/ience without exception. Now if compound bodies may be \are/ so very hard as we find some of them to be & yet are very porous & consist of parts wch are only laid together the simple particles wch are void of pores & were never yet divided must be much harder. For such hard particles being heaped up together can scarce touch one another in more then a few points & therefore must be separable by much less force then is requisite to break a solid particle whose parts touch in all the space between them wthout any pores or interstices to weaken their cohesion. And how such very hard particles wch are only laid together & touch only in a few points can stick together, & that so firmly as they do, wthout the assistance of something wch causes tm to be attracted or prest towards one another, is very difficult to conceive. < text from f 252r resumes > < insertion from f 252v > Symbol (2 dotInAsterisk) in textThe same thing I infer also from the cohering of two polished marbles in Vacuo, & from the standing of Quicksilver in the Barometer at the height of 50 60 or 70 inches or above whenever it is well purged of air & carefully poured in, so that its' parts be every where contiguous both to one another & to the glass. Some imagin that the Quicksilver Marbles are prest together by an ambient æther, & that the Quicksilver is prest up into the Tube by the same æther. But if this æther can pass through either the Quicksilver|Symbol (hand) in text| or the glass it \will/ not press the Quicksilver up into the glass & if it can pass through neither of them it will not let the Quicksilver subside, as it doth whenever the glass it|s| knocked to make the Quicksilver part from it or when\ever/ the Quicksilver hath any bubbles {illeg} in it wch hinder the contact & cohesion of its parts.|| < insertion from the bottom of f 253r > Yet if the æther be rarer between the particles then in open & free spaces, it may press them together by its excess of density. < text from f 252v resumes > The like experiment hath been tried with water well purged of {æther} {Air} from air. {illeg} If Quicksilver or Water \be congealed/ by the fumes of Lead or \water be congealed/ by freezing, the parts of the congeled fluid stick together so as to compose a hard body: & by this experiment of the Barometer it appears that they stick together also in a state of fluidity. Whence its easy to understand that what ever cause makes the parts of ice & hard metals|l|s stick together amongs the same cause will makes them stick together when the bodies are melted, tho perhaps not so firmly. For in fusion the parts of bodies are in a motion of sliding amongst themselves. Symbol (semicircleSurmountedByACross) in text < insertion from the bottom of f 252v > Symbol (semicircleSurmountedByACross) in text And of the same kind \with these experiments/ is this experiment that water ascends in very slender glass pipes{illeg} (even in Vacuo as soon as the lower ends of the pipes are dipped into ye stagnant water; & the narrower are the pipes, the greater is the ascent. And there is the same cause of philtration, An> & of the ascent of water {illeg} in the form of an Hyperbola between two planes of glass inclined to one another in a very acute angle & dipt perpendicularly into the liquor, whether the experiment be tried in the open air or in vacuo. < text from f 252v resumes >

Now the smallest particles of matter may cohere by the strongest attractions & compose bigger particles of weaker vertue &c < text from f 252r resumes > Now the smallest particles of matter may cohere by the strongest attractions and compose And thus nature will be very conformable to her self & very simple, performing all the great motions of the heavenly bodies by the attraction of gravity wch intercedes those bodies & almost all the small ones of their particles by some other attractive power wch intercedes the{illeg} particles bigger particles of weaker vertue & many of these may cohere & compose {illeg} bigger particles whose vertue is still weaker & so on for divers successions untill the progression end in the biggest particles on wch the operations in chymistry & the colours of natural bodies depend, & wch by cohering compose bodies of a sensible magnitude. If the body is compact & bends or yeilds inward to pression without any sliding of its parts, it is hard & elastic

And thus {Nature} will be very conformable to her self & very simple, performing all the great motions of the heavenly bodies by the attraction of gravity wch intercedes those bodies & almost all the small ones of their particles by some other attractive powers wch intercedes the particles |returning to its figure with a force arising from the mutual attraction of its parts. If the parts slide upon one another the body is malleable or soft. If they slip easily & are of a fit size to be agitated by heat & the heat is big enough to keep them in agitation, the body is fluid, & if it be apt to stick to things it is humid; & the drops of every fluid affect a round figure by ‡ < insertion from f 252v > ‡ the mutual attraction of their parts as the globe of ye earth & sea affects a round figure by the mutual attraction of its parts by gravity. < text from f 252r resumes > |

Since metals dissolved in acids attract but a small quantity of the acid, their attractive force can reach but to a small distance from them. And as in Algebra, where affirmative quantities vanish & cease there negative ones begin: so in Mechanicks, where attraction ceases there a repulsive vertue ought to begin \succeed/. And that there is such a vertue seems to follow from the reflexions & inflexions] of the rays of light. For the rays of are repelled by bodies in both these cases without the immediate contact of the reflecting or inflecting body. It seems also to follow from the emission of light, the ray so soon as it is shaken off from a shining body by the vibrating motion of the parts of the body & gets beyond the reach of attraction, being driven away with exceeding great velocity. For that force wch is sufficient to turn it back in reflexion may be sufficient to emit it. It seems also to follow from the production of air & vapor: The particles when they are shaken off from bodies by heat or fermentation so soon as they are beyond the reach of the attraction of the body, receding from ✝& whose Idæas work more powerfully upon fit matter then the Imagination of a mother works upon an Embrios, or that up of a man upon his body for promoting health or sickness: <254r> it & also from one another with great strength, & keeping at a distance. \#/ < insertion from the top of f 253v > # so as sometimes to take up above a million of times more space then they did before in the form of a dense body. Which vast contraction & expansion seems unexplicable \unintelligible/ by feigning the particles of Air to be springy & ramous or rolled up like hoops, or by any other means then a repulsive power. < text from f 254r resumes > The particles of fluids wch do not cohere too strongly & are of such a smalness as renders them most susceptible of those agitations wch keep liquors in a fluor, are most easily separated & rarefied into vapour, & in the language of the Chymists they are volatile, rarefying with an easy heat & condensing with cold. But those wch are grosser & so less susceptible of agitation or cohere by a stronger attraction are not separated without a stronger heat or perhaps not without fermentation And these last are the bodies wch Chemists call fixed & being rarefied by fermentation become true permanent air: those particles receding from one another with the greatest force & being most difficulty brought together wch upon contact cohere most strongly. And because the particles of permanent air are grosser & arise from denser substances then those of vapors, thence it is that true air is more ponderous then vapor & that a moist Atmosphere is lighter then a dry one quantity for quantity, as is found by the Barometer. \/ < insertion from the middle of f 253v > & by thin glass bubbles sealed hermetically, wch being poised in a very nice pair of scales, descend in a most Air & ascend in a dry one. < text from f 254r resumes > From the endeavour of the particles of Air to recede from one another \& from dense bodies/ it comes to pass also that Air is rarer in very slender pipes of glass then in free spaces & by reason of its rarity presses less upon the surface of water into wch the lower end of the pipe is dipped then the open air presses upon it & so gives leave{s} to the water to ascend in the pipe: wch is the ground of philtration. From the same repelling power it \seems to be/ that flys walk upon water without wetting their feet; & that the Object-glasses of long Telescopes lye upon one another without touching; & that dry pouders are difficultly made to touch one another by compression so as to stick together, unless by melting them or wetting them with water wch by exhaling \may/ brings them together, |& that two polished Marbles \wch by immediate contact stick together/ are difficultly brought so close together as to stick.|

And thus Nature will be very conformable to her self & very simple, performing all the great motions of the heavenly bodies by the attraction of gravity wch intercedes those bodies, & almost all the small ones by of their particles by some other attractive & repelling power wch intercedes the particles. And while these powers are of so large an extent, I do not see but that they may be numbered among the general laws of motion. The Vis inertiæ is a passive principle by wch bodies persist in their motion or rest, receive motion in proportion to the force impressing it, & resist as much as they are resisted. By this principle alone there could never have been any motion in the world. Thinking will are active principles by wch we move or bodies according to or will, & thence arise other laws of motion unknown to us, wch, if \& if there be an universal life & all space/ the Universe be the sensorium of a thinking Being, \(for Nature does nothing in vain) those laws/ may be of universal extent. Gravity was recconed among the laws of motion by the ancient Philosophers who attributed gravity to their atoms in vacuo \as the first Principle of their Philosophy./. And the forces above mentioned by wch small bodies act on one another at small distances may have as good a title as gravity to be recconed among those laws \ Life/ < insertion from f 252v > Life & Will are active Principles by wch we move or bodies, according to \& thence arise/ other Laws of motion {illeg} \not yet/ known to us. And since all matter duely formed \by generation & nutrition/ is attended with signes of life, & all things are framed with{illeg} perfect art & wisdome, & Nature does nothing in vain; if there be an universal life, & all space be the sensorium of ā \immaterial living/ thinking Being, who by immediate presence perceives things in it as that wch thinks in us perceives their pictures in the brain, \Symbol (arrow) in text/: the laws of motion arising from Life or Will may be of universal extent. Gravity &c < text from f 254r resumes >

But while I call these forces attraction or repulse, I would not be understood to define the cause or manner of the action. That wch I call the Attraction may be done by impulse or by some other means unknown to me. I only use that word to signify a force by wch bodies tend towards one another as what ever be the cause |Some other Principle was necessary for putting bodies into motion, & now they| are in motion some other Principle is necessary for conserving the motion. motion /For\ F|f|rom the various composition of two motions tis very certain that there is not always the same quantity of motion in the world. For if two globes joyned by a slender rod revolve about their common center of gravity with an uniform motion while that center moves on uniformly in a right line drawn in the center \plane/ <255r> of their \circular/ motion, the summ of the motions of the two globes as often as the globes are in the right line drawn in described by their coon center of gravity will be bigger then the summ of their motions when they are in a line perpendicular to that right line. \By this instance it appears that motion may be got or lost;/ B|b|ut by reason of the tenacity of fluids & attrition of their parts & the weakness of elasticity in solids, motion is much more apt to be lost then got, & is always upon the decay. For bodies wch are {illeg}|ei|ther so absolutely hard or so soft as to be void of elasticity, will not rebound from one another. Impenetrability makes them only stop. If two equal bodies meet directly in vacuo they will be the laws of motion stop where they meet & lose all their motion \& lose all their motion/ & continue to rest, unless they be elastick & receive new motion by \from/ their spring. If they have so much elasticity as suffices to make them rebound with half \a quarter or half or three quarters of/ the force wth wch they came together they will {illeg} rebound with half as much motion as they had before they met the other half being lost lose half their motion lose \lose three quarters or/ half or a quarter of their motion. And this may be tried with \by letting/ two equal pendulums of Lead or soft Clay & letting them fall f against one another from equal heights. |If the pendulums be of lead or soft clay they will lose all or almost all their motion: if of elastic bodies, they will lose all but what they recover from their elasticity.| If three equal round vessels be filled the one with water the other with oyle the third with molten pitch & the liquors be stirred about alike to give them a vortical motion: the pitch by its tenacity will lose its motion quickly, the oyle being less tenacious will keep it longer & the water being least tenacious will keep it longest but yet will lose it in a short time. Whence its easy to understand that if many \contiguous/ Vortices of molten pitch were each of them as large as the Cartesian, yet these & all their parts would by their tenacity & stifness communicate their motion to one another till they all rested among themselves. Vortices of oyle or water or some fluider matter might continue longer in motion but unless the matter were void of all tenacity & attrition of parts & communication of motion (wch is not to be supposed) the motion would constantly decay. Seing therefore the variety of motion \wch we see/ in the world is always decreasing, there is a necessity of conserving & recruiting it by active principles; such as are [the power of life & will by which animals move their bodies with great & lasting force;] the cause of gravity by which Comets & Planets & Comets keep their motions in their Orbs & all|all| bodies acquire great motion in falling; & the cause of fermentation by wch the heart & blood of animals are kept in pepetual {sic} motion & heat, the inward parts of the earth are constantly warmed, & \the inward parts of the earth are constantly warmed/ bodies burn & shine, \mountains take fire, the caverns of the earth are blown up/ & the Sun continues violently hot & lucid & warms all things by his light|.|, For we meet with very little motion in the world besides what is oweing to these active principles <256r> & therefore we ought to inquire diligently into the general Rules or Laws observed by nature in the preservation or production of motion by these principles as the Laws of motion on wch the frame of Nature {b}|d|epends & the genuine Principles of Mechanical Philosophy & the inward parts of the earth are constantly warmed & generate hot sulphureous unhealthful exhalations wch breaking forth with violence cause earthquakes, tempests, & hurricanes, raise or subvert Islands & Mountains, sink Lakes & carry up the sea \partly/ in columns, {&} \partly {illeg}/ in drops & thick mists wch convening above fall down in spouts, & sulphureous steams set mountains on fire & the inward parts of the earth are constantly warmed. For we meet with very little motion in the world besides what is \visibly/ oweing to these active principles, & the power of |the| will

All these things &

<257r>

Qu. 21. Are not the rays of light very small bodies \emitted from shining substances &/ refracted by mean of certain attractions which intercede them & the parts of pellucid bodies. For such bodies will pass through uniform Mediums in right lines without bending into the shadow, wch is the property \nature/ of the rays of light. Pellucid substances S{illeg} They will also conserve their original \be capable of several properties & be able to conserve their/ properties unchanged wch is another prop in passing through several Mediums, wch is another condition of the rays of light. Pellucid substances act upon the rays of light at a distance in refracting reflecting & inflecting them & the rays mutualy agitate the parts of those substances at a distance for heating them; & this action & reaction \at a distance/ very much resembles an attractive force. If refraction be performed by attraction of the rays, the sines of incidence must be to the sines of rest|fr|action in a given proportiō as we shewed in or Principles of Philosophy, & this Rule is true by experien experience. If The rays of light in going out of glass into a Vacuum \are bent towards the glass, and if they/ fall too obliquely on the Vacuum they are \bent backwards into the glass &/ totaly reflected, wch & this reflexion cannot be ascribed to the resistance of the Vacuum, but must be caused by the power of the glass attracting the rays at their going out of {illeg} it glass into the Vacuum & bringing them back|.| into the glass For if the |further| surface of the glass be moistened with water or clear oyle or \liquid &/ clear honey, the rays will go through the glass into \wch would otherwise be reflected will go into/ the water oyle or honey, & therefore are not \not/ reflected \not/ before they arrive at the further surface of the glass |but when th| & begin to go out it into ye Vacuum of it. If they go out of it into water or oyle \or honey/ they go on, being \because/ the attraction of the glass being \is/ almost ballanced & rendred ineffectual by the contrary attraction of the water or oyle \liquor;/ but if they go out of th it into a vacuum wch has no attraction to ballance that of the glass, the attraction of the glass either bends & refracts them or brings them back & reflects them. ✝ < insertion from f 257br > ✝And this is still more evident by {illeg} compressing \laying/ \together/ two Prisms together one of wch is plane, the other a very little convex, \of Glass/ or two Object glasses of |very| long Tl|e|lescopes the one plane the other \a little/ convex, so that the glasses \& so compressing them that they/ do not fully touch but have an {illeg} interval between them wch is less then the ten hundred thousanth|dt|h part of an inch. a \nor are too far asunder./ For the light wch falls upon the further surface of the first glass will go through it into ye second glass where the interval between ye glasses is not above the ten hundred thousandth part of an inch \will go through that surface & through the air \air or or {vacuum}/ between the glasses & \enter/ into the second glass/ as was explained in the 1st 4th & 8th Observations of the first p|P|art of the second Book. But if the second glass be taken away the light will not go on forward but t{illeg}r wch goes out of the second surface \of the first glass into ye air or vacuum Air or Vacuum/ will not go on forward but turns back \into ye 1st glass/ & is reflected; & therefore it is drawn back back by the power of the \first/ glass there being nothing else to bring it back into ye glass stop it to cause it to turn back. For if the further surface of ye glass be plane & well polished & behind it be place the convex Object-glass of a \very/ long Telescope so that ye least distance between the glasses be less then the ten hundred thousandth part of < text from f 257r resumes > Nothing more is requisite for producing all the variety of colours & degrees of refrangibility then that the rays of light be bodies of different sizes, the least of wch \may/ make violet the weakest & darkest of colours & be more easily diverted by refracting surfaces from the right course, & the rest as they are bigger & bigger may make the stronger & more lucid colours blue green yellow & red, & be more & more difficultly diverted. Nothing more is requisite for putting the rays of light into fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission then that they be small bodies {illeg} wch by their attractive powers or some other force stir up vibrations in what they act upon, wch vibrations being swifter then the rays, overtake them & successively & agitate them \so as/ by turns to increasi|e|ng & decreasi|e|ng their velocitity {sic} & thereby putting them into those fits. And lastly the unusual refraction of Island Crystal looks very much as if it were performed by some kind of |attractive vertue lodged in {illeg} \certain/ sides \both/ of the rays & of the particles of ye crystal. For were it not for some kind| |of| disposition or vertue \lodged/ in some sides of the particles of the crystal wch is |&| not in their other sides, & wch inclines & bends the rays towards the coast of unusual refraction; the rays wch fall perpendicularly on the crystall would not be refracted towards that coast rather then towards any other coast both at their incidence & at their emergence, so as to emerge perpendicularly by a contrary situation of the coast of unusual refraction at the second surface; the crystal acting upon the rays after they have past through it & are emerging into the air, or, if you please, into a vacuum. And <258r> since the crystal by this disposition or vertue does not act upon the rays unless when one of {illeg} {their} \their/ sides of unusual refraction looks towards that coast, this argues a vertue or disposition in those sides of the rays wch answers to & sympathizes with that vertue or disposition of the crystal, as the poles of two magnets almost as the poles of two Magnets answer to one another. And as magnetism may be intended & remitted, & is found only in the Magnet & in iron: so this vertue of refracting the perpendicular rays is greater in Island Crystal less in Crystal of the rock & is not yet found in other bodies. I do not say that this vertue of is magnetical: It seems to be of another kind. And \I only say that/ what ever it be, its difficult to conceive how the rays of light unless they be bodies can have a permanent vertue in two of their sides wch is not in their other sides & this without any regard to their position to the space or medium through wch they pass.

<259r>

Qu. 22. Are not \gross/ bodies & light convertible into one another: & may not bodies receive their activity from the rays particles of light wch enter their composition? For all fixt bodies being heated emit light so long as they continue sufficiently hot, & light mutualy stops in bodies as often as its rays strike upon their parts, as we shewed above. I know no body less apt to shine then water, & yet water by frequent destillations changes into fixed earth & this earth \as Mr Boyle has tried & then this earth being enabled to endure a sufficient heat/ shines as much by heat as any \like/ other body|i|es. The changing of light into bodies into light & light into bodies is very conformable to the course of nature, which seems delighted with transmutations Water, wch is a very fluid volatile tastless salt, she changes by heat into vapour wch is a sort of air, & by cold into ice wch is a hard pellucid brittle fusible stone: & this stone returns into water by heat & vapour returns into water by cold. Earth by heat becomes fire & by cold returns into Earth. Dense bodies by fermentation rarefy into several sorts of air & this air by fermentation & sometimes without it returns into dense bodies. Mercury appears sometimes in the form of a fluid ponderous running Mercury |a fluid metal|, sometimes in the form of a hard brittle metal, sometimes in the form of a corrosive pellucid salt called sublimate, sometimes in the form of a tastless pellucid volatile white earth called Mercurius dulcis, or in that of a red opake volatile earth called Cinnaber, or in that of a red or white precipitate, or in that of a fluid salt, |&| In destillation it turns into vapour. |&| Being agitated in vacuo it shines like fire. And being dropt into a red hot earthen Retort it destills in the form of common water pellucid & tastless And after all these & other changes it returns again into Mercury. \Eggs grow from insensible magnitudes & change into animals, Tad-poles into Frogs & worms into Flyes./ All Birds Beasts & Fishes Insects Trees & other Vegetables with their several parts, grow out of water & watry tinctures & salts, & by putrefaction return again into watry substances. And \destilled/ water standing a few days in the open air yeilds a tincture which (like that of Mault) by standing longer yeilds an sediment & a spirit, but before putrefaction is fit nourishment for animals & vegetables. And among such various & strange transmutations why may not Nature change bodies into light & light into bodies?

Now attraction in bodies of the same kind & vertue attraction is strongest in the smallest bodies in proportion to their bulk. It is found stronger in small magnets for their weight then in great ones. For the parts of small ones being closer together unite their forces more easily. And therefore since the rays of light are the smallest bodies known to us we may expect to find their attractions very strong. And how strong they are may be gathered by this proportion \Rule/. The attraction of a ray of light in proportion to the body \quantity of its matter/ is to the gravity of a projectile in proportion to its body \the quantity of its matter/ in a compound ratio of the velocity of the ray of light to the velocity of the projectile \twice/ & of the bent or curvity of the ray in the place of refraction to the bent or curvity of the line described by the projectile supposing the inclination of the ray to the ray to the refracting surface & that of the projectile to the horizon to be alike. And by this proportion I reccon the attraction of the rays of light to be above <260r> ten hundred thousand thousand millions of times greater then the weight of bodies on the surface of this earth in proportion to the matter in them, supposing that light comes from the sun to us in about seven \or eight/ minutes of {times} an hour. |And in immediate contact of the rays their force may be still much greater.| And so great a force in the rays cannot but have a very great effect upon the particles of matter with wch they are compounded for causing the particles to attract one another & for putting them in motion amongst them another themselves: for the better understanding of which I will propose the following Quæstion.

<261r>

Qu. 17. If a stone be thrown into stagnating water, the undulations \waves {illeg}/ excited thereby continue some time \to begin arise/ in the place where the stone fell into the water, & are propagated from thence in concentric circles upon the surface of the water to great distances. And the vibrations \or tremors/ excited in the Air by percussion continue a little time to move from the place of percussion in concentric sh|p|heres to great distances. And \in like manner/ when a ray of light falls upon the surface of any pellucid body & is there refracted or reflected: may not the vibrations \be/ thereby excited in the refracting or reflecting Medium at the point of incid incidence, \&/ continue \to arise there & to be propagated from thence/ as long as when they are excited in the bottom of the eye by the pressure & motion of the finger, or by the light wch comes from the coale of fire in the experiments above mentioned? And are not these vibrations propagated from the point of incidence to great distances|?| from And do they not overtake the rays of light, & by overtaking them successively, do they not put them into the fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission described above? For if the rays endeavour to recede from the densest part of the vibration they may be alternately accelerated & retarded by the vibrations overtaking them.

Qu. 18. If in two large & tall cylindrical vessels of glass inverted, two little Thermometers be suspended so as not to touch the vessels; & the air be drawn out of one of these vessels, & these vessels thus prepared be carried out of a cold place into a warm one: the Thermometer in vacuo will grow warm \as much &/ almost as soon as the Thermometer which is not in vacuo. And when the Vessels are carried back into the cold place, the Thermometer in vacuo will grow cold almost as soon as the other Thermometer. Is not the heat of the warm room conveyed through the Vacuum by the vibrations of a much subtiler Medium then Air, which, after the Air i|wa|s drawn out, remained in the Vacuum? And is not this Medium the same with that Medium by wch light is refracted & reflected, & by whose vibrations light communicates heat to bodies & is put into fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission? \/ < insertion from the top of f 261v > \And/ Do not the vibrations of this Medium in hot bodies, contribute to the duration of their heat? And do not hot bodies communicate their heat to contiguous cold ones by the vibrations of this Medium propagated from them into the cold ones? And is not this Medium exceedingly more rare & subtile then the Air & exceedingly more elastic & active? < text from f 261r resumes > And doth not this \æthereal/ Medium readily pervade all bodies? And is it not \by its elastic force/ expanded through all the heavens?

Q. 19. Doth not the refraction of light proceed from the different density of this \æthereal/ Medium in different places, the light receding from the denser parts of the Medium? & being totally in passing through glass or crystall & in passing thro falling very obliquely upon the further surface of the glass or crystal being totally reflected by means of the density of this Medium without the glass or crystall? And is not the density thereof greater in free & open spaces void of Air & other grosser bodies, then within the pores of water glass crystal \gemms/ & other compact bodies? For when light passes through glass or crystall & falling very obliquely upon the further surface thereof is totally reflected thereby, the total reflexion ought to proceed rather from the density & vigour of the Medium without & beyond the glass, then from the rarity & weakness thereof.

Qu. 20. Doth not this \Æthereal/ Medium in passing out of water glass crystal & other compact substances & dense bodies into empty spaces & grow denser & denser by degrees, & by that means refract the rays of light not in a point but by bending them gradually in curve lines? And doth not the gradual condensation of this Medium extend to some distance from the bodies, & thereby cause the inflexions of the rays of light which pass by the edges of compact bodies at some distance from the bodies?

<262r>

Qu. 21. Is not this Medium much rarer within \the dense bodies of/ the Sun, Starrs, {illeg} Planets \& Comets/, then in the \celestial/ spaces, without \between/ them, & in passing from them to great distances doth it not grow denser & denser perpetually & thereby cause the gravity of those great bodies towards one another, & their parts towards the bodies; every body endeavouring to go from the denser parts of the Medium towards the rarer? For if this Medium be rarer within the Sun's body then at its surface, & rarer there then at the distance of \the hundredth part of any inch from its body, & rarer there than at/ the tenth part of an inch from its body, & rarer \there/ then at the orb of Saturn: I see no reason why the increase of density should stop any where & not rather be continued through all distances from the Sun to Saturn, & beyond. And tho this increase of density may at great distances be exceeding slow yet if the elastick force of this Medium be exceeding great, it may suffice to impell bodies from the denser parts of the Medium towards the rarer with all that power which we call gravity. And that the elastick force of this Medium is exceeding great, may be gathered from the swiftness of its vibrations. Sounds move about 1140 English feet in a second minute of time, & in seven or eight minutes of time they move about one hundred English miles. Light moves from the Sun to us in about seven or eight minutes of time, wch distance is about 70000000 English miles, supposing the horizontal Parallax of the Sun to be about 12″. And the vibrations |or pulses| of this Medium, that they may cause the alternate fits of easy transmission & easy reflexion, must be swifter then light, & by consequence above 700000 times swifter than sounds. And therefore the elastick force of this Medium must be in proportion to its density must be above 700000 x 700000 times greater then the elastic force of the Air is in proportion to its density. For in \elastic/ Mediums of equal density, the elasticity is \must be/ in a duplicate ratio of the velocity of the pulses. |And if the density be increased or diminished \&/ the elasticity must be increased or diminished in the same proportion, that the velocity will remain the same| < insertion from the middle of f 261v > & in those of unequal density the velocity if the elasticicity {sic} & density be encreased or decreased in one & the same proportion the velocity will remain the same. < text from f 262r resumes >

< insertion from f 261v > Qu. 22. May not Planets & Comets & \all/ other gross bodies perform their motions with more freely & with much less resistance than in a fluid den in this Æthereal Medium then in \a/ fluid supposed by some to be denser than quicksilver? wch fills all space \adequately/ without \{illeg} leaving/ any pores, & by consequence is \much/ denser then quicksilver \or gold/? And may not its resistance be so small as to be inconsiderable? For instance: {illeg} If this Æther (for so I will call it) should be supposed 700000 times more elastick then Air & \above/ 700000 times more rare; its resistance would be above 600000000 times less then that of water. And so small a resistance would scarce make any sensible alteration in the motions of the Planets in ten thousand years. If {you} \any one would/ ask how any Medium can be so rare, \let him/ tell me first how |the| Air be 16000 times rarer then gold \can be/ in the upper parts of the Atmosphere can be above 1000000 \ten hundred thousand/ times rarer then gold. < text from f 262r resumes >

Qu. 23. Is not vision performed by the vibrations of this Medium excited in the bottom of the eye by the rays of light & propagated through the solid pellucid & uniform capillamenta of the auditory \optic/ nerves into the place of sensation? And is not hearing performed by the vibrations either of this or some other Medium excited in the auditory nerves by the tremors of the Air & propagated through the solid pellucid & uniform capillamenta of those nerves into the place of sensation? And so of the other senses. I suppose the capillamenta of the nerves taken singly, to be pellucid that they may be uniform. But the < insertion from f 261v > But the reflexions of light in the surfaces of the{illeg} capillamenta cause the nerves themselves to appeare white & opake. < text from f 262r resumes >

Qu. 24. Is not animal motion performed by the vibrations of this Medium excited in the brain by the power of the will, & propagated from thence through the solid \pellucid/ & uniform capillamenta of the nerves into the muscles for contracting & dilating them? I suppose the \single/ capillamenta of the nerves to be solid \&/ uniform & pellucid that the motion may be propagated uniformly along them uniformly & without interruption. For obstructions in the Nerves create Palsies. |And that they may be uniform, I suppose them \when viewed singly to be/ pellucid, tho the reflexions in their surfaces may make the whole nerve appear opake & white (composed of a great number of capillamenta) appear pellucid & opake & while. For if the capillamenta be not continued pellucid the reflexions of light from their inward parts, will argue that those parts are not continued but {illeg} are distinguished from have reflecting surfaces by wch they are interrupted \{bounded}/ & distinguished from one another.|

Qu. 23.

The force of the resistance arises only from the density of the Medium \& is proportionall to ye □ of ye velocity of the moving body/ & {sic} will not put a resting body into motion. the force of gravity is here deduced only from the elasticity of the medium, |&| \from/ the variation of it density & \without any regard to the velocity of the body & may/ put a resting body into motion. And while these two forces depend upon different causes, the one may be very small while \&/ the other very great.

Resistance & Gravity are here ascribed to different causes; [resisistance {sic} arises from \to/ ye density of ye Medium & velocity of the body, gravity to the \variation of/ elasticity] gr the one to the variation of elasticity, the other to the

And if any / And yet ye elasticity for causing gravity may be exceeding great.

& by consequence exceedingly less able to resist the motions of projectiles & exceedingly more able to press upon the pa gross bodies by endeavouring to expand it self.

<263r>

Qu. 17. If a stone be thrown into stagnating water, the waves excited there by continue some time to arise in the place where the stone fell into the water, & are propagated from thence in concentric circles upon the surface of the water to great distances. And the vibrations or tremors excited in the Air by percussion continue a little time to move from the place of percussion in concentric spheres to great distances. And in like manner, when a Ray of light falls upon the surface of any pellucid body & is there refracted or reflected may not \waves of/ vibrations \or tremors/ be thereby excited in the refracting or reflecting Medium at the point of incidence & continue to arise the|re| & to be propagated from thence as long as \they continue/ when they are excited in the bottom of the eye by the pressure or motion of the finger or by the light which comes from the coale of fire in the experiments above mentioned? And are not these vibrations propagated from the point of incidence to great distances? And do they not overtake the rays of light, & by overtaking them successively do they not put them into the fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission described above? For if the rays endeavour to recede from the densest part of the vibration, they may be alternately accelerated & retarded by the vibrations overtaking them.

Qu. 18. If in two large tall cylindricall vessels of glass inverted, two little Thermometers be placed suspended so as not to touch the vessels, & the Aer be drawn out of one of these vessels, & these vessels thus prepared be carried out of a cold place into a warm one: the Thermometer in vacuo will grow warm as much & almost as soon as the Thermometer which is not in vacuo. And when the Vessels are carried back into the cold place, the Thermometer in vacuo will grow cold almost as soon as the other Thermometer. Is not the heat of the warm room conveyed through the Vacuum by the vibrations of a much subtiler Medium then Air, wch after the Air was drawn out remained in the Vacuum? And is not this Medium the same with that Medium by which light is refracted & reflected, & by whose vibrations light communicates heat to bodies, & is put into fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission? And do not not the vibrations of this Medium in hot bodies contribute to the intenseness & duration of their heat? And do not hot bodies communicate their heat to contiguous cold ones by the vibrations of this Medium propagated from them into the cold ones? And is not this Medium exceedingly more rare & subtile then the Air & exceedingly more elastick & active? And doth it not readily pervade all bodies? And is it not \(by its elastic force)/ expanded through all the heavens?

Qu. 19. Doth not the refraction of light proceed from the different density of this æthereal Medium in different places, the light receding always from the denser parts of the Medium? And is not the density thereof greater in free & open spaces void of Air & other grosser bodies then within the pores of water glass crystal gemms & other compact bodies? For when light passes through glass or crystal & falling very obliquely very obliquely upon the further surface thereof is totally reflected, the total reflexion ought to proceed rather from the density & vigour of the Medium without & beyond the glass, than from the rarity & weakness thereof.

Qu. 20. Doth not this æthereal Medium in passing out of water glass crystal & other compact & dense bodies into empty spaces grow denser <264r> & denser by degrees, & by that means refract the rays of light not in a point but by bending them gradually in curve lines? And doth not the gradual condensation of this Medium extend to some distance from the bodies & thereby cause the inflexions of the rays of light which pass by the edges of dense bodies at some distance from the bodies?

Qu. 21. Is not this Medium much rarer within the dense bodies of the Sun Stars Planets & Comets then in the \empty/ celestial spaces between them, & in passing from them to great distances doth it not grow denser & denser perpetually & thereby cause the gravity of those great bodies towards one another, & of their parts towards the bodies; every body endeavouring to go from the denser parts of the Medium towards the rarer? For if this Medium be rarer & {was e} within the Sun's body then at its surface, & rarer there then at the hundredth part of an inch from its body, & rarer there then at the fiftith part of an inch from its body, & rarer there then at the Orb of Saturn: I see no reason why the increase of density should stop anywhere & not rather be continued through all distances from the Sun to Saturn & beyond. And tho this increase of density may at great distances be exceeding slow, yet if the elastick force of this Medium be exceeding great, it may suffice to impell the bodies from the denser parts of the Medium towards the rarer with all that power wch we call gravity. And that the elastick force of this Medium is exceeding \great/ may be gathered from the swiftness of its vibrations. Sounds move about 1140 English feet in a second of a minute of time, & in seven or eight minutes of time they move about one hundred English miles. Light moves from the sun to us in about seven or eight minutes of time, wch distance is about 70000000 English miles, supposing the horizontal Parallax of the Sun to be about 12″. And the vibrations or pulses of this Medium, that they may cause the alternate fits of easy transmission & easy reflexion, must be swifter then light, & by consequence above 700000 times swifter then sounds. And therefore the elastick force of this Medium in proportion to its density must be above 700000 x 700000 times greater then the elastick force of the Air is in proportion to its density. For in elastic Mediums, of equal density the elasticity must be \is/ in a duplicate ratio of the velocity of the pulses. And in those of unequal density, if the elasticity be proportio{illeg}nal to the density the velocity will remain the same.

Qu. 23. Is not vision performed by the vibrations of this Medium excited in the bottom of the Eye by the rays of light & propagated through the solid pellucid & uniform capillamenta of the optick nerves into the place of sensation? And is not hearing performed by the vibrations either of this or some other Medium excited in the auditory nerves by the tremors of the Air, & propagated through the solid pellucid & uniform capillamenta of those nerves into the place of sensation? And so of the other senses. || < insertion from f 263v > ‡ For the velocities of the pulses of elastic Mediums are in a subduplicate ratio of the elasticities & the rarities of the Mediums taken together.

As attraction is stronger in small magnets then in great ones in proportion to their bulk, & gravity is greater in the surfaces of small planets then in those of great ones in proportion ot their bulk, & small bodies are agitated much more by electric attraction then great ones: so the smallness of the rays of light may contribute very much to the power of the agent by which they are refracted. And so if any one should suppose that Ether (like our air) may contein particles which endeavour to recede from one another (for I do not know what this Æther is) & that its particles are exceedingly smaller then those of air, or even then those of light: the exceeding smallness of its particles may contribute to the greatness of the force by which those particles may recede from one another, & thereby make that Medium more exceedingly more rare & elastic then Air, & by consequence exceedingly less able to resist the motions of projectiles & [exceedingly more able to press upon gross bodies by endeavouring to expand it self. < text from f 264r resumes >

Qu. 22. May not Planets & Comets & all gross bodies perform their motions more freely & with much less resistance in this æthereal Medium then in any fluid wch fills all space adequately without leaving any pores, & by consequence is much denser then quicksilver or gold? And may not its resistance be so small as to be inconsiderable? For instance. If this Æther (for so I will call it) should be supposed 700000 times more elastic then or Air & above 700000 times more rare; its resistance would be above 600000000 times less then that of water. And so small a resistance would scarce make any sensible alteration in the motions of the Planets in ten thousand years. If any one would ask how a Medium can be so rare; let him tell me how the Air in the upper parts of the Atmosphere can be above ten \an hundred/ hundred|thousand| thousand times rarer then Gold.

Qu. 23. Is not vision performed by the vibrations of this Medium excited in the bottom of the eye by the rays of light, & propagated through the solid pellucid & uniform capillamenta of the optick nerves into the place of sensation? And is not hearing performed by the vibrations either of this or some other Medium excited in the auditory nerves by the tremors of the Air, & propagated through the solid pellucid & uniform capilla <265r> menta of those nerves into the place of sensation? And so of the other senses.

Qu. 24. Is not animal motion performed by the vibrations of this heart Medium excited in the brain by the power of the will, & propagated from thence through the solid pellucid & uniform capillamenta of the nerves into the muscles for contracting & dilating them? I suppose that the motion vibrating motion of the ethereal Medium may be propagated along them from one end to the other uniformly & without interruption For obstructions in the Nerves create palsies. And that they may be |sufficiently| uniform I suppose them to be pellucid when viewed singly, tho the reflexions in their cylindrical surfaces may make the whole nerve (composed of many capillamenta) appear opake & white. For opacity arises from reflecting surfaces, such as may disturbe & interrupt the motions.

Qu. 25. Are there not other original properties of the rays of light besides those already described? An instance of another original property we have in the refraction of Island Crystal described first by Erasmus Bartholine & afterwards more exactly by Hugenius in his Book De la lumiere. This crystal is a pellucid fissile stone clear as water or crystal of the rock, & without colour; enduring a red heat without loosing it's transparency, & in a very strong heat calcining without fusion. Steeped a day or two in water it looses its natural transparency polish. Being rubbed on cloth it attracts pieces of straws & other light things like Ambar or Glass: & with Aqua fortis it makes an ebullition. It seems to be a sort of Talk & is found in form of an oblique Parallelopiped [with six parallelogram sides & eight solid angles. The obtuse angles of the Parallelogramms are each of them 101 degrees & 52 minutes; the acute ones 78 degrees & 8 minutes. Two of the solid angles opposite to one another, as C & E, are compassed each of them with three of these obtuse angles, & each of the other six with one obtuse & two acute ones. It cleaves easily in planes parallel to any of its sides, & not in any other planes. It cleaves with a glossy polite surface not perfectly plane but with some little uneavenness. It is easily scratcht, & by reason of it's softness it takes a polish very difficultly. It polishes better upon polished looking-glass then upon metal, & perhaps better upon pitch leather or parchment. Afterwards it must be rubbed with a little oyle or white of an egg to fill up its scratches: whereby it will become very transparent & polite. But for several experiments, it is not necessary to polish it. If a piece of this crystalline stone be laid upon a book, every letter of the Book seen through it will appear double by means of a double refraction. And if any beam of light falls either perpendicularly or in any oblique angle upon any surface of this crystal, it becomes divided into two beams by means of the same double refraction. Which beams are of the same colour with the incident beam of light, & seem equal to one another in the quantity of their light, or very nearly equal. One of these refractions is performed by the usual Rule of Opticks, the sine of i|I|ncidence |out of Air into this Crystal| being to the sine of Refraction, as five to three. The other Refraction, which may be called the unusual Refraction, is performed by the following Rule.

Let ADBC represent the refracting surface of the crystall, C the biggest solid angle at that surface, GG|C|HF the opposite surface, & CK a perpendicular on that surface. This perpendicular makes with the edge of the crystal CF an angle of 19degr. 3′. Ioyne KF & in it take KL so that the angle CKL KCL be 6degr. 40′, & the angle LCF 12degr. 28′. And if ST represent any beam of light incident at T in any angle upon the refracting surface ADBC, let TV be the refracted <266r> beam determined by the given proportion of the sines 5 to 3 according to the usual rule of Opticks. Draw VX parallel & equal to KL. Draw it the same way from V in which L lieth from K; & joyning TX, this line TX shall be the other refracted beam carried from T to X by the unusual refraction.

If therefore the incident beam ST be perpendicular to the refracting surface, the two beams TV & TX into which it shall become divided, shall be parallel to the lines CK & CL; one of those beams going through the crystall perpendicularly as it ought to do by the usual laws of Opticks, & the other TX by an unusual refraction diverging from the perpendicular & making with it an angle VTX of about 623 degrees, as is found by experience. And hence the plane VTX & such like planes which are parallel to the plane CFK, may be called the planes of perpendicular refraction. And the coast towards which the lines KL & VX are drawn, may be called the coast of unusual refraction.

In like manner Crystal of the rock has a double refraction: but the difference of the two refractions is not so great & manifest as in Island crystall.

When the beam ST incident on Island Crystal, is divided into two beams TV & TX, & these two beams arrive at the further surface of the glass; the beam TV which was refracted at the first surface after the usual manner, shall be again refracted entirely after the usual manner at the second surface; & the beam TX which was refracted after the unusual manner in the first surface shall be again refracted \entirely/ after the unusual manner in the second surface: so that both these beams shall emerge out of the second surface in lines parallel to the first incident beam ST.

And if two pieces of Island Crystall be placed one after another in such manner that all the surfaces of the latter be parallel to all the corresponding surfaces of the former: the rays which are refracted after the usual manner in the first surface of the first crystall shall be refracted after the usual manner in all the following surfaces: & the rays which are refracted after the unusual manner in the first surface shall be refracted after the unusual manner in all the following surfaces. And the same thing happens tho the surfaces of the crystalls be any ways inclined to one another, provided that their planes of perpendicular refraction be parallel to one one another.

And therefore there is an original difference in the rays of light by means of wch some rays are in this Experiment constantly refracted after the usual manner, & others constantly after the unusual manner For if the difference be not original but arises from new modifications imprest on the rays at their first refraction it would be altered by new modifications in the three following refractions: whereas it suffers no alteration but is constant & has the same effect upon the rays in all the refractions. The unusual refraction is therefore performed by an original property of the rays. And it remains to be enquired whether the rays have not more original properties then are yet discovered.

Qu. 26. Have not the rays of light several sides endued with several original properties? For if the planes of perpendicular refraction of the second crystall, be at right angles with the planes of perpendicular refraction of the first crystall: the rays wch are refracted after the usual manner in passing through the first crystall will be all of them refracted after the unusual manner in passing through the second crystall; & the rays wch are refracted after the unusual manner in passing through the first crystall will be all of them refracted after the usual manner in passing through the second crystall. And therefore there are not two sorts of rays differing in their nature from{illeg} one another, one of which is constantly & in all positions refracted after the usual manner, & the other constantly & in all positions after the unusual <267r> manner. The difference between the two sorts of rays in the Experiment mentioned in the 25th Question, was only in the positions of the sides of the rays to the planes of perpendicular refraction. For one & the same ray is here refracted sometimes after the usual & sometimes after the unusual manner according to the position which its sides have to the crystalls. If the sides of the rays are posited the same way to both crystalls, it is refracted after the same manner in them both: but if that side of the ray which looks towards the coast of the unusual refraction of the first crystall be 90 degrees from that side of the same ray which looks towards the coast of the unusual refraction of the second crystall, (which may be effected by varying the position of the second crystall to the first, & by consequence to the rays of light the ray shall be refracted after several manners in the several crystalls. There is nothing more required to determin whether the rays of light which fall upon the second crystall shall be refracted after the usual or after the unusual manner, but to turn about this crystal so that the coast of this crystalls unusuall refraction may be on this or on that side of the ray. And therefore every ray may be considered as having four sides or quarters, two of which opposite to one another incline the ray to be refracted after the unusual manner as often as either of them are turned towards the coast of unusual refraction, & the other two whenever either of them are turned towards the coast of unusual refraction, do not incline it to be otherwise refracted then after the usual manner. The two first may therefore be called the sides of unusual refraction. And since these dispositions were in the rays before their incidence on the second third & fourth surfaces of the two crystalls, & suffered no alteration (so far as appears) by the{illeg} refraction of the rays in those surfaces their passage through those surfaces, & the rays were refracted by the same laws in all the four surfaces; it appears that those dispositions were in the rays originally, & suffered no alteration by the first refraction, & that by means of those dispositions the rays were refracted at their incidence on the first surface of the first crystal, some of them after the usual & some of them after the unusual manner, accordingly as their sides of usual re unusual refraction were then turned towards the coast of the unusual refraction of that crystal or sideways from it.

Every ray of light has therefore two opposite sides originally endued with a property on which the unusual refraction depends, & other two opposite sides not endued with that property. And it remains to be enquired whether there are not more properties of light by wch the sides of the rays differ & are distinguished from one another.

In explaining the difference of the sides of the rays above mentioned, I have supposed that the rays fall perpendicularly on the first crystall. But if they fall obliquely on it, the success is the same. Those rays which are refracted after the usual manner in the first crystall will be refracted after the unusual manner in the second crystall; supposing the planes of perpendicular refraction to be at right angles with one another as above: & on the contrary.

If the planes of the perpendicular refraction of the two crystalls be neither parallel nor perpendicular to one another but contein an acute angle: the two beams of light which emerge out of the first crystall, will be each of them divided into two more at their incidence on the second crystall. For in this case the rays in each of the two beams will some of them have their sides of unusual refraction & some of them their other sides turned towards the coast of the unusual refraction of the second crystall.

Qu. 27. Are not all Hypotheses erroneous which have hitherto been invented for explaining the phenomena of light by new modi <268r> fications of the rays? For those phenomena depend not upon new modifications as has been supposed, but upon the original & unchangeable properties of the rays.

Qu. 28. Are not all Hypotheses erroneous in which light is supposed to consist in pression or motion propagated through a fluid Medium? For in all these Hypotheses the phænomena of light have been hitherto explained by supposing that they arise from new modifications of the rays: which is an erroneous supposition.

If light consisted only in pression propagated without actual motion it would not be able to agitate & heat the bodies wch refract & reflect it. If it consisted in motion propagated to all distances in an instant it would require an infinite force every moment in every [shining particle to generate that motion. And if it consisted in pression or motion propagated either in an instant or in time it would bend into the shadow. For pression or motion cannot be propagated in a fluid in right lines beyond an obstacle which stops part of the motion, but will bend & spread every way into the quiescent Medium wch lyes beyond the obstacle. Gravity tends downwards, but the pressure of water arising from Gravity tends every way with equal force & is propagated as readily & with as much force sideways as downwards & through crooked passages as through streight ones. The waves on the surface of stagnating water, {illeg} passing by the sides of a broad obstacle which stops part of them, bend afterwards & dilate themselves gradually into the quiet water behind the obstacle. The waves, pulses or vibrations of the Aer wherein sounds consist, bend manifestly tho not so much as the waves of water. For a Bell or a Canon may be heard beyond a hill which intercepts the sight of the sounding body, & sounds are propagated as readily through crooked pipes as through streight ones. But light is never known to follow crooked passages nor to bend into the shadow. For the fixt stars by the interposition of any of the Planets cease to be seen. And so do the parts of the Sun by the interposition of the Moon, Mercury or Venus. The rays which pass very neare to the edges of any body are bent a little by the action of the body, as we shewed above, but this bending is not towards but from the shadow, & is performed only in the passage of the ray by the body & at a very small distance from it. So soon as the ray is past the body, it goes right on.

To explain the unusual refraction of Island Crystal by pression or motion propagated has not hitherto been attempted (to my knowledge) except by Huygens who for that end supposed two several vibrating Mediums within that Crystall. But when he tryed the refractions in two successive pieces of that crystall, & found them such as is mentioned above: he confessed himself at a loss for explaining them. For pressions or motions propagated from a shining body through an uniform Medium must be on all sides alike: whereas by those experimets {sic} it appears that the rays of light have different properties in their different sides. He suspected that the pulses of Æther in passing through the first crystall might receive certain new modifications which might determin them to be propagated in this or that Medium within the second crystal according to the position of that crystall. [1] But what modifications those might be he could not say, nor think of any thing satisfactory in that point. And if he had known that the unusual refraction depends not on new modifications but {illeg}on the original & unchangeable dispositions of the rays, he would have found it as difficult to explain how those dispositions which he supposed to be imprest on the rays by the first crystall, could be in them before their incidence on that crystall; & in general, how all rays emitted by shining bodies, can have those dispositions in them from the beginning. To me at least this seems inexplicable if light be nothing else then pression \or/ motion propagated through Æther.

<269r>

And it is as difficult to explain by these Hypotheses how rays can be alternately in fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission; unless perhaps one might suppose that there are in all space two ethereal vibrating Mediums, & that the vibrations of one of them constitute light, & the vibrations of the other are swifter, & as often as they overtake the vibrations of the first, put them into those fits. But how two æthers can be diffused through all space, one of which acts upon the other & by consequence is reacted upon, without retarding shattering dispersing & confounding one anothers motions is inconceivable. And against filling the heavens with fluid Mediums unless they be exceeding rare, a great objection arises from the regular & very lasting motions of the Planets & Comets in all manner of courses through the heavens. For thence it is manifest that the heavens are voyd of all sensible resistance & by consequence of all sensible matter.

For the resisting power of fluid{illeg} Mediums arises partly from the attrition of the parts of the Medium & partly from the vis inertiæ of the matter. That part of the resistance of a spherical body which arises from the attrition of the parts of the Medium is very nearely as the diameter, or, at the most, as the \factum of the/ diameter & the velocity of the spherical body together. And that part of the resistance wch arises from the vis inertiæ of the matter is as the square of that factum. & the density of the Me And by this difference the two sorts of resistance may be distinguished from one another in any Medium; & these being distinguished, it will be found that almost all the resistance of bodies of a competent magnitude moving in Aer, Water, {illeg} Quicksilver, & such like fluids with a competent velocity, arises from the Vis Inertiæ of the parts of the fluid

Now that part of the resista|i|nc|g|e power of any Medium which arises from the tenacity friction or attrition of the parts of the Medium may be diminished by dividing the matter into smaller parts & making the parts more smooth & slipery: but that part of the resistance which arises from the vis inertiæ, is proportional to the density of the matter & cannot be diminished by dividing the matter into smaller parts nor by any other means then by decreasing the density of the Medium. And for these reasons the density of fluid Mediums is very nearely proportional to their resistance. Liquors which differ not much in density as water, spirit of wine, spirit of Turpentine, hot oyle, differ not much in resistance. Water is thirteen or fourteen times lighter then Quicksilver, & by consequence thirteen or fourteen times rarer, & its resistance is less then that of quicksilver in the same proportion or thereabouts, as I have found by experiments made with Pendulums. The open Air in which we breath is eight or nine hundred times lighter then water & by consequence eight or nine hundred times rarer, & accordingly its resistance is less then that of water in the same proportion or thereabouts; as I have also found by experiments made with Pendulums. And in thinner Air the resistance is sitll less, & at length, by rarefying the Air, becomes insensible. For small feathers falling in the open Air meet with great resistance, but in a tall glass \well/ emptied of Air they fall as fast as lead or gold, as I have seen tried several times. Whence the resistance seems still to decrease in proportion to the density of the fluid. For I do not find by any experiments that bodies moving in Quicksilver, Water or Air, meet with any other sensible resistance then what arises from the density & tenacity of those sensible fluids, as they would do if the pores of those fluids & all other spaces were filled with a dense & subtile fluid. Now if the resistance in a vessel well emptied of Air, was but an hundred times less then in the open Air, it would be about a million of times less then in quicksilver. But it seems to be much less in such a vessel, & still much less in the heavens at the height of three or four hundred miles from the earth or above. For Mr Boyle has shewed that Air may be rarefied above ten thousand times in vessels of glass: & the heavens are much <270r> emptier of Air then any vacuum we can make below. For since the Air is comprest by the weight of the incumbent atmosphere, & the density of Air is proportional to the force compressing it, it follows by computation that at the height of about seven English miles from the Earth the aer is four times rarer then at the surface of the Earth, & at the height of 14 miles it is sixteen times rarer then at the surface of the earth, & at the height of 21, 28, or 35 miles it is respectively 64, 256 or 1024 times rarer or thereabouts; & at the height of 70, 140 or 210 miles it is about 1000000, 1000000000000 or 1000000000000000000 times rarer; & so on.

Heat promotes fluidity very much by diminishing the tenacity of bodies. It makes many bodies fluid which are not fluid in cold, & increases the fluidity of tenacious liquids as of o|O|yle Balsam & Honey, & thereby decreases their resistance. But it decreases not the resistance of water considerably as it would do if any considerable part of the resistance of water arose from the attrition or tenacity of its parts. And therefore the resistance of water arises principally & almost entirely from the Vis inertiæ of its matter; & by consequence, if the heavens were as dense as quicksilver they would water they would not have much less resistance then water; if as dense as quicksilver they would not have much less resistance then quicksilver; if absolutely dense or full of matter without any vacuum, let the matter be never so subtile & fluid, they would have a greater resistance then quicksilver. A solid globe in such a Medium would lose above half its motion in moving three times the length of its diameter, & a globe not solid (such as are the Planets) would be retarded sooner. And therefore to make any way for the regular & lasting motions of the Planets & Comets, its necessary to empty the heavens of all matter, except perhaps some very thin vapors steams or effluvia arising from the Atmospheres of the Earth, Planets & Comets, & such an exceedingly rare æthereal Medium as we described above. A dense fluid can be of no use for explaining the Phænomena of nature, the motions of the Planets & Comets being better explained without it. It serves only to disturb & retard the motions of those great bodies & make the frame of nature languish: & in the pores of bodies, it serves only stop the vibrating motions of their parts wherein their heat & activity consists. And as it is of no use & hinders the operations of nature & makes her languish, so there is no evidence for its existence, & therefore it ought to be rejected. And if it be rejected, the Hypotheses that light consists in pression or motion propagated through such a Medium, are rejected with it.

And for rejecting such a Medium we have the authority of those the oldest & most celebrated Philosophers of Greece & Phenicia who made a Vacuum & Atoms & the gravity of Atoms the first Principles of their Philosophy; tacitely attributing gravity to some other cause then dense matter. Later Philosophers banish the consideration of such a cause out of Natural Philosophy, feigning Hypotheses for explaining all things mechanically & referring other causes to Metaphysicks: whereas the main business of natural Philosophy is to argue from Phænomena without feigning Hypotheses, & to deduce causes from effects till we come to the very first cause, wch certainly is not mechanical; & not only to unfold the mechanism of the world but chiefly to resolve these & such like questions. What is there in places almost empty of matter, & whence is it that the Sun & Planets gravitate towards one another without dense matter between them? Whence is it that Nature doth nothing in vain, & whence arises all that order & beauty wch we see in the world? To what end are Comets, & whence is it that Planets move all one & the same way in Orbs concentric, while Comets move all manner of ways in Orbs very excentric, & what hinders the fixt stars from falling upon one another? How came the bodies of animals to be contrived with so much art, & for what ends were there several parts? Was the eye contrived without skill in Opticks, & the ear without knowledge of sounds? How do the motions of the body follow from the will, & <271r> whence is the instinct in animals? Is not the sensory of animals that place to wch the things sensitive substance is present, & into which the sensible species of things are carried through the nerves & brain that there they may be perceived by their immediate presence to that substance? And these things being rightly dispatcht, does it not appear from phænomena that there is {illeg} a Being incorporeal, living, intelligent, omnipresent, who in infinite space, as it were in his sensory, sees the things themselves intimately, & throughly perceives them & comprehends them wholy by their immediate presence to himself: of which things the images only carried through the organs of sense into \our/ little sensoriums, are there seen & beheld by that wch in us perceives & thinks. And tho every true step made in this Philosophy brings us not immediately to the knowledge of the first cause, yet it brings us nearer to it, & on that account is to be highly valued.

Qu. 29. Are not the rays of light very small bodies emitted from shining substances? For such bodies will pass through uniform mediums in right lines without bending into the shadow, wch is the nature of the rays of light. They will also be capable of several properties & be able to conserve their properties unchanged in passing through several Mediums, which is another condition of the rays of light. Pellucid substances act upon the rays of light at a distance in refracting reflecting & inflecting them, & the rays mutually agitate the parts of those substance for heating them at a distance for heating them; & this action & reaction at a distance very much resembles an attractive force between bodies. if refraction be performed by attraction of the rays, the sines of incidence must be to the sines of refraction in a given proportion, as we shewed in our Principles of Philosophy; & this Rule is true by experience. The rays of light in going out of glass into a Vacuum, are bent towards the glass, & if they fall too obliquely on the vacuum they are bent backwards into the glass & totaly reflected; & this reflexion cannot be ascribed to the resistance of an absolute Vacuum, but must be caused by the power of the glass attracting the rays at their going out of it into the Vacuum & bringing them back. For if the{r} further surface of the glass be moistened with water or clear oyle or liquid & clear honey: the rays which would otherwise |be| go into the reflected will go into the water ol|y|le or honey, & therefore are not reflected before they arrive at the further surface of the glass & begin to go out of it. If they go out of it into the water oyle or honey, they go on, because the attraction of the glass is almost ballanced & rendred ineffectual by the contrary attraction of the liquor. But if they go out of it into a Vacuum which has no attraction to ballance that of the glass, the attraction of the glass either either bends & refracts them, or brings them back & reflects them. And this is still more evident by laying together two Prisms of glass, or two Object-glasses of very long Telescopes, the one plane the other a little convex, & so compressing them that they do not fully touch nor are too far asunder. For the light which falls upon the further surface of the first glass where the interval between the glasses is not above the ten [hundred thousandth part of an inch, will go through that surface, & through the air or vacuum between the glasses, & enter into the second glass, as was explained in the first fourth & eighth Observations of the first Part of the second Book. But if the second glass be taken away, the light which goes out of the second surface of the first glass into the Air or Vacuum, will not go on forwards but turns back into the first glass & is reflected; & therefore it is drawn back by the power of the first glass, there being nothing else to turn it back. Nothing more is requisite for the producing all the variety of colours & degrees of refrangibility then that the rays of light be bodies of different sizes, the least of which may make violet the weakest & darkest of the colours, & be <272r> more easily diverted by refracting surfaces from the right course; & the rest as they are bigger & bigger, may make the stronger & more lucid colours, blue, green, yellow, & red, & be more & more difficultly diverted. Nothing more is requisite for putting the rays of light into fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission, then that they be small bodies which by their attractive powers or some other force, stir up vibrations in what they act upon, which vibrations being swifter then the rays, overtake them successively, & agitate them so as by turns to increase & decrease their velocities & thereby put them into those fits. And lastly the unusual refraction of Island Crystal looks very much as if it were performed by some kind of attractive vertue lodged in certain sides both of the rays & of the particles of the crystal. For were it not for some kind of disposition or vertue lodged in some sides of the particles of the crystall & not in their other sides, & wch inclines & bends the rays towards the coast of unusual refraction; the rays which fall perpendicularly on the crystall, would not be refracted towards that coast rather then towards any other coast, both at their incidence & at their emergence, so as to emerge perpendicularly by a contrary situation of the coast of unusual refraction at the second surface; the crystall acting upon the rays after they have past through it & are emerging into the Ae|i|r, or, if you please, into a Vacuum. And since the crystall by this disposition or vertue does not act upon the rays unless when one of their sides of unusual refraction looks towards that coast, this argues a vertue or disposition in those sides of the rays, which answers to & sympathizes with that vertue or disposition of the crystall as the poles of two magnets answer to one another. And as magnetism may be intended & remitted, & is found only in the Magnet & in iron: so this vertue of refracting the perpendicular rays is greater in Island Crystall, less in Crystall of the rock, & is not yet found in other bodies. I do not say that this vertue is magnetical. It seems to be of another kind. I only say that what ever it bee, it's difficult to conceive how the rays of light unless they be bodies, can have a permanent vertue in two of their sides wch is not in their other sides, & this without any regard to their position to the space or Medium through which they pass.

What I mean in this Question by a Vacuum & by the attractions of the rays of light towards glass or crystall may be understood by what was said in the 18th 19th & 20th Questions.

Qu. 30. Are not gross bodies & light convertible into one another, & may not bodies receive much of their activity from light the particles of light which enter their composition? For all fixt bodies being heated emit light so long as they continue sufficiently hot, & light mutually stops in bodies as often as its rays strike upon their parts, as we shewed above. I know no body less apt to shine then water; & yet water by frequent destillations changes into fixed earth, as Mr Boyle has tried, & then this earth being enabled to endure a sufficient heat, shines by heat like other bodies.

The changing of bodies into light & light into bodies is very conformable to the course of nature, which seems delighted with transmutations. Water wch is a very fluid volatile tastless salt, she changes by heat into vapour wch is a sort of air, & by cold into ice wch is a hard pellucid brittle fusible stone: & this stone returns into water by heat & vapour returns into earth by water by cold. Earth by heat becomes fire & by cold returns into earth. Dense bodies by fermentation rarefy into several sorts of air, & this air by fermentation & sometimes without it; returns into dense [bodies. Mercury appears sometimes in the form of a fluid metall, sometimes in the form of a hard brittle metall; sometimes in the form of a corrosive pellucid salt called sublimate, sometimes in the form of a tastless pellucid volatile white earth called <273r> Mercurius dulcis, or in that of a red opake volatile earth called Cinnaber, or in that of a red or white Precipitate, or in that of a fluid salt; & in destillation it turns into vapour, & beign agitated in Vacuo it shines like fire. And after all these changes it returns again into its first form of Mercury. Eggs grow from insensible magnitudes & change into animals, Tadpoles into Froggs, & Worms into flyes. All Birds Beasts & Fishes, Insects Trees & other Vegetables with their several parts, grow out of water & watry substances tinctures & salts, & by putrefaction return again into watry substances. And water standing a few days in the open air, yeilds a tincture, which (like that of Mault) by standing longer yeilds a sediment & a spirit, but before putrefaction is fit nourishment for animals & vegetables. And among such various & strange transmutations, why may not nature change bodies into light & light into bodies?

Qu. 31. Have not the small particles of bodies certain powers virtues or forces by which they act at a distance, not only upon the rays of light for reflecting refracting & inflecting them, but also upon one another for producing a great part of the phænomena of nature? For its well known that bodies act one upon another by the attractions of gravity one among another magnetism & electricity, & these instances shew the tenour & course of nature, & make it not improbable that but that there may be more attractive powers then these. For Nature is very consonant & conformable to her self. How these attractions may be performed I do not here consider. What I call attraction may be performed by impulse or by some other means unknown to me. I use that word here to signify only in general any force by which bodies tend towards one another whatsoever be the cause. For we must learn from the phænomena of nature what bodies attract one another, & what are the laws & properties of the attraction, before we enquire the cause by which the attraction is performed. The attractions of gravity magnetism & electricity reach to very sensible distances, & so have been observed by vulgar eyes, & there may be others which reach to so small distances as hitherto escape observation, & perhaps electrical attraction may reach to such small distances even without being excited by friction.

For when salt of Tartar runs per deliquium, is not this done by an attraction between the particles of the salt of Tartar & the particles of the water which float in the Aer in the form of vapors? And why does not common salt or saltpeter or vitriol run per deliquium but for want of such an attraction? Or why does not salt of Tartar draw more water out of the Air then in a certain proportion to its quantity, but for want of an attractive force after it is satisfied|tiated| with water? And whence is it but from this attractive power that water wch alone distills with a gentle heat lukewarm heat will not destill from salt of Tartar but from without a great heat? And is it not from the like attractive power between the particles of oyle of Vitriol & the particles of water, that Oyle of Vitriol draws to it a good quantity of water out of the Air, & after it is satiated draws no more, & in destillations lets go the water very difficultly? And when water & oyle of Vitriol poured sucessively into the same vessel grow very hot in the mixing, does not this heat argue a great motion in the parts of the liquors? And does not this motion argue that the parts of the liquo two liquors in mixing coaless with violence & by consequence rush towards one another with an accelerated motion? And when Aqua fortis or spirit of Vitriol poured upon filings of iron dissolves the filings with a great heat & ebullition, is not this heat & ebullition effected by a violent motion of <274r> the parts, & does not that motion argue that the acid parts of the liquor rush towards the parts of the metall with violence, & run forcibly into its pores till they get between its outmost particles & the main mass of the metall, & surrounding those particles loosen them from the main mass & set them at liberty to flote off into the water? And when the acid particles which alone would destill with an easy heat will not separate from the particles of the metall without a very vio[lent heat, does not this confirm the attraction between them?

When spirit of Vitriol poured upon common salt or saltpeter makes an ebullition with the salt & unites with it, & in destillation the spirit of the common salt or saltpeter comes over much esier {sic} then it would do before, & the acid part of the spirit of Vitriol stays behind; does not this argue that the fixed Alcaly of the salt attracts the acid spirit of the Vitriol more strongly then its own spirit, & not being able to hold them both, lets go its own? And when oyle of Vitriol is drawn off from its weight of Nitre, & from both the ingredients a compound spirit of Nitre is destilled, two parts of wch being poured on one part of cloves oyle of cloves or Carvy seeds, or of any ponderous vegetable oyle, or oyle of animal substances, or oyle of Turpentine thickened with a little Balsam of sulphur, grows so very hot in mixing as presently to send up a burning flame: does not this very great & sudden heat argue that the two liquors mix with violence, & that their parts in mixing run towards one another with an accelerated motion, & clash with the greatest force? And is it not for \the/ same reason that well rectified spirit of wine poured on the same compound spirit flashes, & that the pulvis fulminans composed of sulphur Nitre & salt of Tartar, goes off with a more sudden & violent explosion then Gun-powder, the acid spirits of the sulphur & nitre rushing towards one another & towards the Tartar salt of Tartar with so great a violence, as by the shock to turn the whole at once into vapour & flame? Where the dissolution is slow it makes a slow ebullition & a gentle heat, & where it is quicker it makes a greater ebullition with more heat, & where it is done at once the ebullition is contracted into a sudden blast or violent explosion with a heat equal to that of fire & flame. So when a drachm of the above-mentioned compound spirit of Nitre was poured upon half a drachm of oyle of Carvi sees in vacuo, the mixture immediately made a flash like gunpowder & burst the exhausted Receiver, which was a glass six inches wide and eight inches deep. And even the gross body of sulphur poudered, & with an equal weight of iron filings & a little water made into past, acts upon the iron, & in five or six hours grows too hot to be touched, & emits a flame. And by these experiments compared with the great quantity of Sulphur with which the Earth abounds, & the warmth of the interior parts of the earth & hot springs & burning mountains & with damps, mineral corruscations, earthquakes, hot suffocating exhalations, hurricanes & spouts: we may learn that sulphureous steams abound in the bowells of the earth & ferment with mineralls, & sometimes take fire with a sudden corruscation & explosion, & if pent up in subterraneous caverns, burst the caverns with a great shaking of the earth as in springing of a Mine. And then the vapour generated by the explosion, expiring through the pores of the earth, feels hot & suffocates & makes tempests & hurricanes, & sometimes causes the land to slide, or the sea to boyle, & carries up the water thereof in drops which by their weight fall down again in spouts. Also some sulphureous steams, at all times when the earth is dry, ascending into the Air, ferment there with nitrous acids, & sometimes taking fire cause lightning & thunder & fiery meteors. For the Air abounds with acid vapours fit <275r> to promote fermentations, as appears by the rusting of iron and copper in it, the kindling of fire by blowing, & the beating of the heart by means of respiration. Now the above mentioned motions are so great & violent as to shew that in fermentations, the particles of bodies which almost rest are put into new motions by a very potent principle which acts upon them only when they approach one another, & causes them to meet & clash with great violence, & grow hot with the motion, & dash one another into pieces, & vanish into air & vapour & flame.

When salt of Tartar per deliquium, being poured into the solution of any metal, precipitates the metall, & makes it fall down to the bottom of the liquor in the form of mud: does not this argue that the acid particles are attracted more strongly by the salt of Tartar then by the metall, & by the stronger attraction go from the metal to the salt of Tartar? And so when a solution of iron in Aqua fortis dissolves the Lapis Calaminaris & lets go the iron, or a solution of Copper dissolves iron immersed in it & lets go the copper, or a solution of silver dissolves copper & lets go the silver, or a solution of Mercury in Aqua fortis being poured upon Iron Copper Tin or Lead, dissolves the metall & lets go the Mercury, does not this argue that the acid particles of the Aqua fortis are attracted more strongly by the Lapis Calaminaris then by Iron, & more strongly by iron then by copper, & more strongly by Copper then by silver, & more strongly by Iron Copper Tin & Lead then by Mercury? And is it not for the same reason that iron requires more Aqua fortis to dissolve it then Copper, & Copper more then the other metalls; & that of all metalls, Iron is dissolved most easily, & is most apt to rust; & next after Iron, Copper?

When Oyle of Vitriol is mixed with a little water, or is run per deliquium, & in destillation the water ascends difficultly, & brings over with it some part of the oyle of Vitriol in the form of spirit of Vitriol, & this spirit upon being poured upon iron copper or salt of Tartar unites with the body & lets go the {spirit} water, doth not this shew that the acid spirit is attracted by the water, & more attracted by the fixt body then by the water, & therefore lets go the water to close with the fixt body? And is it not for the same reason that the water & acid spirits which are mixed together in Vinegar, Aqua fortis, & spirit of salt, cohere & rise together in destillation; but if the Menstruum be poured on salt of Tartar, or on Lead or Iron or any fixt body which it can dissolve, the acid by a stronger attraction {illeg} adheres to the body & lets go the water? And is it not also from a mutual attraction that the spirits of soot & sea-salt unite & compose the particles of Salarmoniac, wch are less volatile then before because grosser & freer from water; & that the particles of Salarmoniac in sublimation carry up the particles of Antimony wch will not sublime alone; & that the particles of Mercury uniting with the acid particles of spirit of salt compose Mercury sublimate, & with the particles of Sulphur compose cinnaber; & that the particles of spirit of wine & spirit of urin well rectified unite, & letting go the water which dissolved them compose a consistent body; & that in subliming cinnaber from salt of Tartar or \from/ quick lime, the sulphur by a stronger attraction of the salt or lime lets go the Mercury & stays with the fixt body; & that when Mercury sublimate is sublimed from Antimony or from Regulus of Antimony, the spirit of salt lets go the Mercury, & unites with the Antimonial metall which attracts it more strongly, & stays with it till the heat be great enough to make them both ascend together, & then carries up the metall with it in the form of a very fusible salt called Butter of Antimony, although the spirit of salt alone be almost as volatile as water, & the Antimony alone as fixt as Lead?

<276r>

When Aqua fortis dissolves silver & not gold, & Aqua regia dissolves gold & not silver; may it not be said that Aqua fortis is subtile enough to penetrate gold as well as silver, but wants the attractive force to give it entrance, & that Aqua regia is subtile enough to penetrate silver as well as gold, but wants the attractive force to give it entrance? For Aqua regia is nothing else then Aqua fortis mixed with some spirit of salt or with Salarmoniac; & even common salt dissolved in Aqua fortis enables the Menstruum to dissolve gold tho the salt be a gross body. When therefore spirit of salt precipitates silver out of Aqua fortis, is it not done by attracting & mixing with the Aqua fortis, & not attracting or perhaps repelling silver? And when water precipitates Antimony out of the sublimate of Antimony & Salarmoniac, or out of butter of Antimony, is it not done by \its/ dissolving, mixing with & weakening the Salarmoniac or spirit of salt & its not attracting or perhaps repelling the Antimony? And is it not for want of an attractive vertue between the parts of water & oyle, of Quicksilver & Antimony, of Lead & Iron, that these substances do not mix; and by a weak attraction that Quicksilver & Copper mix difficultly; & from a strong one that Quicksilver & Tin, Antimony & Iron, water & salts mix readily? And in general, is it not from the same principle that heat congregates homogeneal bodies & separates heterogeneal ones?

When Arsnick with soap gives a Regulus & with Mercury sublimate a volatile fusible salt like butter of Antimony; doth not this shew that Arsnick, wch is a substance totally volatile, is compounded of fixt & volatile parts strongly cohereing {sic} by a mutual attraction so that the volatile will not ascend without carrying up the fixed? And so, when an equal weight of spirit of wine & oyle of vitriol are di{illeg}|gest|ed together, & in destillation yeild two fragrant volatile spirits wch will not mix with one another, & a fixt black earth remains behind; doth not this shew that oyle of Vitriol is composed of volatile & fixed parts strongly united by attraction so as to ascend together in form of a volatile acid fluid salt, untill the spirit of wine attracts & separates the volatile parts from the fixed? And therefore since oyle of sulphur per campanam is of the same nature with oyle of Vitriol; may it not be inferred that Sulphur is also a mixture of volatile & fixed parts so strongly cohering by attraction as to ascend together in sublimation. By dissolving flowers of sulphur in oyle of Turpentine & di|e|stilling the solution, it is found that Sulphur is composed of an inflamable thick oyle or fat bitumen, an acid salt, a very fixed earth & a little sulphur metall. The three first were found not much unequall to one another, the fourth in so small a quantity as scarce to be worth considering. The acid salt dissolved in water is the same with Oyle of Sulphur per Campanam, & abounding much in the bowells of the earth & particularly in Markasites, unites it self to the other ingredients of the Markasite, which are, Bitumen, Iron, Copper & Earth, & with them compounds Alume, Vitriol, & Sulphur. With the earth alone it compounds Alume; with the Metall alone or Metal & Sal earth together \it/ compounds Vitriol; & with the Bitumen & Earth it compounds Sulphur. Whence \it/ comes to pass that Marcasites abound with those three Mineralls. And is it not from the mutual attraction of the ingredients that they stick together for compounding these mineralls, & that the Bitumen carries up the other ingredients of the sulphur, which without it would not sublime? And the same Question may be put concerning all or almost all the gross bodies in nature. For all the parts of animals & vegetables are composed of substances volatile & fixed, fluid & solid, as appears by their Analysis; & so are salts & minerals so far as Chymists have been hitherto able to examin their composition.

<277r>

When Mercury sublimate is resublimed with fresh Mercury & becomes Mercurius dulcis, which is a white tastless earth scarce dissolvable in water, and Mercurius dulcis resublimed with spirit of salt returns into Mercury sublimate; & when Metalls corroded with a little acid turn into rust, which is an earth tastless & indissolvable in water, & this earth imbibed with more acid becomes a metallic salt; & when some stones, as Spar of Lead, dissolved in proper menstruums become salts; do not these things shew that salts are dry earth, & watry acid united by attraction, & that the earth will not become a salt without so much acid as makes it dissolvable in water? Do not the sharp & pungent tasts of acids arise from the strong attraction whereby the acid particles rush upon & get agitate the particles of the tongue? And when metalls are dissolved in acid menstruums, & the acids in conjunction with the metall act after a different manner so that the compound has a different tast much milder then before, & sometimes a sweet one; is it \not/ because the acids adhere to the metallic particles, & thereby, lose much of their activity? And if the acid be in too small a proportion to make the compound dissolvable in water, will it not by adhering strongly to the metall become unactive & lose its tast, & the compound be a tastless earth? For such things as are not dissolvable by the moisture of the tongue, act not upon the tast.

As gravity makes the sea flow round the denser & weightier parts of the globe of the earth; so the attraction may make the watry acid flow round the denser & compacter particles of earth for composing the particles of salt. For otherwise the acid would not do the office of a medium between the earth & common water for making salts dissolvable in the water: nor would salt of Tartar readily draw off the acid from dissolved metalls; nor metalls the acid from Mercury. Now as in the great globe of the earth & sea, the densest bodies by their gravity sink down in water, & always endeavour to go towards the center of the globe; so in particles of salt the densest matter may always endeavour to approach the center of the particle: so that a particle of salt may be compared to a chaos, being dense hard dry & earthy in the centre, & rare, soft, moist, & watry in the circumference. And hence it seems to be that salts are of a lasting nature, being scarce destroyed unless by drawing away their watry parts by violence or by violence or by letting them soak into p|t|he pores of the central earth by a gentle heat in putrefaction, untill the earth be dissolved by the water, & separated into smaller particles, which by reason of their smallness make the rotten compound appear of a black colour. Hence also it may be that the parts of animals & vegetables preserve their several forms & assimilate their nourishment; the soft & moist nourishment easily changing its texture by a gentle heat & moisture motion, till it becomes like the dense hard dry & durable earth in the centre of each particle. But when the nourishment grows unfit to be assimilated, or the central earth grows too feeble to assimilate it, the motion ends in putrefaction confusion, putrefaction, & death.

If a very small quantity of any salt or Vitriol be dissolved in a great quantity of water, the particles of the salt or vitriol will not sink to the bottom, tho they be heavier in specie then the water, but will eavenly diffuse themselves into all the water, so as to make it as saline at the top as at the bottom. And does not this imply that the parts of the salt or Vitriol recede from one another, & endeavour to expand themselves, & get as far asunder as the quantity of water in which they float, will allow?

<278r>

And does not this endeavour imply that they have a repulsive force by which they fly from one another, or at least that they attract the water more strongly then they do one another? For as all things ascend in water which are less attracted then water by the gravitating power of the earth: so all the particles of salt which float in water & are less attracted then water by any one particle of salt, must recede from that particle & give way to the more attracted water.

When any saline liquor is evaporated to a cuticle & let cool, the salt concretes in regular figures, which argues that the particles of the salt before they concreted, floated in the liquor at equal distances in rank & file, & by consequence that they acted upon one another by some power which at equal distances is equal, at unequal distances unequal. For by such a power they will range themselves uniformly, & without it they will float irregularly & come together as irregularly. And since the particles of Island Crystall act all the same way upon the rays of light for causing the unusual refraction, may it not be supposed that in the formation of this crystall, the particles not only ranged themselves in rank & file for concreting in regular figures, but also by some kind of polar vertue turned their homogeneal sides the same way.

The parts of all homogeneal hard bodies which fully touch one another stick together very strongly. And for explaining how this may be some have invented hooked atoms, which is begging the question; & others tell us that bodies are glued together by rest, that is, by an o|O|ccult Quality, or rather by nothing; & others that they stick together by conspiring motions, that is, by relative rest amongst themselves. I had rather inferr from their cohesion, that their particles attract one another by some force, which in immediate contact is exceeding strong, at small distances performs the chymical operations above mentioned, & reaches not far from the particles with any sensible effect.

All bodies seem to be composed of hard particles: For otherwise fluids would not congeale, as water, oyles, vinegre, & spirit or oyle of Vitriol do by freezing, Mercury by fumes of Lead, spirit of Nitre & Mercury by dissolving the Mercury & evaporating the flegm, spirit of Wine & spirit of Urin by deflegming & mixing them, & spirit of urine & spirit of salt by subliming them together to make Salarmoniac. Even the rays of light seem to be hard bodies: for otherwise they would not retain different properties in their different sides. And therefore hardness may be recconed the property of all uncompounded matter. At least this seems to be as evident as the universal impenetrability of matter. For all bodies so far as experience reaches, are either hard or may be hardned, & we have no other evidence of universal impenetrability besides a large experience without an experimental exception. Now if compound bodies are so very hard as we find some of them to be, & yet are very porous, & consist of parts which are only laid together: the simple particles which are void of pores & were never yet divided, must be much harder. For such hard particles being heaped up together, can scarce touch one another in more then a few points, & therefore must be separable by much less force then is requisite to break a solid particle, whose parts touch in all the space between them without any pores or interstices to weaken their cohesion. And how such very hard particles which are only laid together & touch only in a few points, can stick together, & that so firmly as they do, without the assistance of something which causes them to be attracted or prest towards one another, is very difficult to conceive.

The same thing I inferr also from the cohering of two polished Marbles in Vacuo, & from the standing of Quicksilver in the Barometer at the height <279r> of 50, 60 or 70 inches or above, when ever it is well purged of air & carefully poured in, so that its parts be every where contiguous, both to one another & to the glass. The Atmosphere by its weight presses the Quicksilver \/ < insertion from the top of f 279v > ‡ into the glass to the height of 29 or 30 inches. And some other Agent raises it higher, not by pressing it into the glass but by making its parts stick to the glass & to one another. For upon any discontinuation of parts made either by bubbles or by shaking the glass, the whole Mercury falls down to the height of 29 or 30 inches. < text from f 279r resumes >

And of the same kind with these experiments are those that follow. If two plane polished plates of glass (suppose two pieces of a polished looking-glass) be laid together so that their sides be parallel & at a very small distance from one another, & then their lower edges be dipped into water; the water will rise up between them. And the less the distance of the glasses is, the greater will be the height to which the water will rise. If the distance be about the hundredth part of an inch, the water will rise to the height of about an inch; & if the distance be greater or less in any proportion, the height will be reciprocally proportional to the distance very nearly. For the attractive force of the glasses is the same whether the distance between them be greater or less; & the weight of the water drawn up, is the same, if the height, of it be reciprocally proportional to the height \distance/ of the glasses. And in like manner, water ascends between two Marbles polished plane, when their polished sides are parallel, & at a very little distance from one another. And if slender pipes of glass be dipped at one end into stagnating water, the water will rise up within the pipe, & the height to which it rises will be reciprocally proportional to the diameter of the pipe cavity of the pipe, & will equal the height to which it rises between two planes of glass, if the semidiameter of the cavity of the Pipe be equal to the distance between the planes, or thereabouts. And these Experiments succeed after the same manner in Vacuo as in the open Aer, & therefore are not influenced by the weight or pressure of the Atmosphere.

And if a large Pipe of glass be filled with sifted ashes well pressed together in the glass, & one end of the Pipe be dipped into stagnating water: the water water will \rise/ up slowly in the ashes so as in the space of a week or fortnight to reach up within the glass to the height of 30 or 40 inches above the stagnating water. And the water rises up to this height by the attraction only of those particles of the ashes only which are upon the surface of the elevated water; the particles wch are within the water, attracting it as much downwards as upwards. And therefore the attraction of the particles is very strong. But the particles of the ashes being not so dense & close together as those of glass their attraction is not so strong as that of glass wch keeps Quicksilver suspended to the height of {illeg} 60 or 70 inches & therefore attracts with a force wch would keep water suspended to the height of above fifty feet.

By the same principle, a Sponge sucks in water, & the Glands in the bodies of animals, according to their several natures & dispositions, suck in various juices from the blood.

If two plane polished plates of glass three or four inches broad & twenty or twenty five long, be laid, one of them parallel to ye horizon, the other upon the first so as at one of their ends to touch {&} one another & contein an Angle of about 10 or 15 minutes, & the same be first moistened on their inward sides with a clear cloth dipt into oyle of Oranges or spirit of Turpentine, & a drop or two of the Oyle \or Spirit/ be let fall upon the lower glass at the other end: so soon as the upper glass is laid down upon the lower so as to touch it at one end as above, & to touch the drop at the other end, making with the lower glass an angle of about 10 or 15 minutes; the drop will begin to move towards the concourse of the glasses, & will continue to move with an <280r> accelerated motion till it arrives at that concourse of the glasses. For the two glasses attract the drop & make it run that way towards which the attractions incline. And if when the drop is in motion you lift up that end of the glasses where they meet & towards which the drop moves: the drop will ascend between the glasses & therefore is attracted. And as you lift up the glasses more & more the drop will ascend slower & slower & at length rest being then carried downward by its weight as much as upwards by the attraction. And by this means you may know the force by which the drop is attracted at all distances from the concourse of the glasses.

Now by some experiments of this kind it has been found that the attraction is almost reciprocally in a duplicate proportion of the distance of the middle of the drop from the concourse of the glasses; [viz, reciprocally in a [simple proportion by reason of the spreading of the drop & its touching each glass in a larger surface; & again reciprocally in a simple proportion by reason of the spreading of the drop attractions growing stronger within the \same/ quantity of attracting surface. The attraction therefore within the same quantity of attracting surface, is reciprocally as the distance between the glasses. And therefore where the distance is exceeding small, the attraction must be exceeding great. By the Table in the second part of the second Book, wherein the thicknesses of coloured plates of water between two glasses are set down, the thickness of the Plate where it appears very black, is three eighths of the ten hundred thousandth part of an inch. And where the oyle of Oranges between the glasses is of this thickness, the attraction collected by the foregoing Rule, seems to be so strong, as within a circle of an inch in diameter to suffice to hold up a weight equal to that of a cylinder of water of an inch in diameter & two or three furlongs in length. And where it is of a less thickness the attraction may be proporti\on/ally greater, & continue to increase untill \the/ thickness do not exceed that of a single particle of the Oyle. There are therefore Agents in nature able to make the particles of bodies stick together by very strong attractions. And it is the buisiness {sic} of experimental Philosophy to find them out.

Now the smallest particles of matter may cohere by the strongest attractions & compose bigger particles of weaker vertue, & many of these may cohere & compose bigger particles whose vertue is still weaker, & so on for divers successions untill the progression end in the biggest particles on which the operations in Chymistry & the colours of natural bodies depend & which by cohering compose bodies of a sensible magnitude. If the body is compact & bends or yeilds inward to pression without any sliding of its parts, it is hard & elastick, returing {sic} to its figure with a force arising from the mutual attraction of its parts. If the parts slide upon one another the body is malleable or soft. If they slip easily & are of a fit size to be agitated by heat, & the heat is big enough to keep them in agitation the body is fluid; & if it be apt to stick to things it is humid; & the drops of every fluid affect a round figure by the mutual attraction of their parts, as the globe of the Earth & Sea affects a round figure {th} by the mutuall attraction of its parts by gravity.

Since metalls dissolved in acids attract but a small quantity of the acid, their attractive force can reach but to a small distance from them. And as in Algebra, where affirmative quantities vanish & cease, there negative ones begin, so in Mechanicks, where attraction ceases there a repulsive vertue ought to succeed. And that there is such a vertue seems to follow from the reflexions & inflexions of the rays of light. For the rays are repelled by bodies in both these cases without the immediate contact of the reflecting or inflecting body. It seems also to follow from the emission of light, the ray so soon as it is shaken off from a shining body by the vibrating motion of the parts of the body, & gets beyond the reach of attraction, being driven away with exceeding great velocity. For that <281r> force which is sufficient to turn it back in reflexion may be sufficient to emit it. It seems also to follow from the production of Air & Vapor. The particles when they are shaken off from bodies by heat or fermentation, so soon as they are beyond the reach of the attraction of the body, receding from it, & also from one another with great strength, & keeping at a distance, so as sometimes to take up above a million of times more space then they did before in the form of a dense body. Which vast contraction & expansion seems unintelligible by feigning the particles of Air to be spongy springy & ramous, or rolled up like hoops, or by any other means then a repulsive power. The particles of fluids which do not cohere too strongly & are of such a smallness as renders them most susceptible of those agitations wch keep liquors in a fluor, are most easily separated & rarefied into vapor, & in the language of the Chymists, they are volatile, rarefying with an easy heat & condensing with cold. But those which are grosser & so less susceptible of agitation or cohere by a stronger attraction, are not separated without a stronger heat, or perhaps, not without fermentation. And these last are the bodies wch Chemists call fixed, & being rarefied by fermentation become true permanent air: those particles receding from one another with the greatest force, & being most difficultly brought together, wch upon contact cohere most strongly. And because the particles of permanent Air are grosser & arise from substances denser substances then those of vapors, thence it is that true Air is more ponderous then vapor, & that a moist atmosphere is lighter then a dry one quantity for quantity. From the same repelling power it seems to be that flyes walk upon the water without wetting their feet; & that the Object-glasses of long Telescopes lye upon one another without touching; & that dry pouders are difficultly made to touch one another so as to stick together, unless by melting them, or wetting them with water which by exhaling may bring them together; & that two polished marbles which by immediate contact stick together, are difficultly brought together so close together as to stick.

And thus Nature will be very conformable to her self & very simple, performing all the great motions of the heavenly bodies by the attraction of gravity wch intercedes those bodies, & almost all the small ones of their particles by some other attractive & repelling powers wch interceede the particles. The Vis inertiæ is a passive principle by wch bodies persist in their motion or rest, receive motion in proportion to the force impressing it, & resist as much as they are resisted. By this Principle alone there never could have been any motion in the world. Some other Principle was necessary for putting bodies into motion; & now they are in motion some other Principle is necessary for conserving the motion. For from the various composition of two motions tis very certain that there is not always the same quantity of motion in the world. For if two globes joyned by a slender rod, revolve about their common center of gravity with an uniform motion while that center moves on uniformly in a right line drawn in the plane of their circular motion; the summ of the motions of the two globes, as often as the globes are in the right line described by their common center of gravity, will be bigger then the summ of their motions when they are in a line perpendicular to that right line. By this instance it appears that motion may be got or lost. But by reason of the tenacity of fluids, & attrition of their parts, & the weakness of elasticity in solids, motion is much more apt to be got t lost then got, & is always upon the decay. For bodies which are either absolutely hard, or so soft as to be void of elasticity, will not rebound from one another. Impenetrability makes them only stop. If two equal bodies meet directly in Vacuo <282r> they will by the laws of motion stop where they meet & lose all their motion & remain in rest unless they be elastick & receive new motion from their spring. If they have so much elasticity as suffices to make them rebound with a quarter or half or three quarters of the force with which they come together, they will lose three quarters or half or a quarter of their motion. And this may be tried by letting two equal Pendulums fall against one another from equal heights. If the Pendulums be of lead or soft clay they will lose all or almost all their motions: if of elastick bodies they will lose all but what they recover from their elasticity. If it be said that they can lose no motion but what they communicate to other bodies; the consequence is that in Vacuo they can lose no motion, but when they meet they must go on & penetrate one anothers dimensions. If three equal round Vessels be filled the one with water, the other with oyle, the third with molten pitch, & the liquors be stirred about alike to give them a vortical motion: the pitch by its tenacity will lose its motion quickly, the oyle being less tenacious will keep it longer, & the water being least tenacious will keep it longest, but yet will lose it in a short time. Whence it is easy to understand that if many contiguous Vortices of molten pitch were each of {them} as large as those which some suppose to revolve about the Sun & fixt starrs, yet these & all their parts would by their tenacity & stifness communicate their motion to one another till they all rested among themselves. Vortices of oyle or water or some fluider matter might continue longer in motion, but unless the matter were void of all tenacity & attrition of parts & communication of motion (wch is not to be supposed,) the motion would constantly decay. Seing therefore the variety of motion which we see find in the world is always decreasing, there is a necessity of conserving & recruiting it by active principles, such as are the cause of gravity by which Planets & Comets keep their motions in their Orbs & bodies acquire great motion in falling; & the cause of fermentation by which the heart & blood of animals are kept in perpetual motion & heat, the inward parts of the earth are constantly warmed & in some places grow very hot, bodies burn & shine, mountains take fire, the caverns of the earth are blown up, & the Sun continues violently hot & lucid & warms all things by his light. For we meet with very little motion in the world besides what is oweing to these active Principles. And if it were not for these Principles the bodies of the Earth, Planets, Comets, Sun, & all things in them would grow cold & freeze & become inactive masses, & all putrefaction generation vegetation & life would cease, & the Planets {illeg} the Planets & Comets would not remain in their Orbs.

All these things being considered, it seems to me that God in the beginning formed matter in solid massy hard impenetrable moveable particles of such sizes & figures & with such other properties & in such proportion to space as most conduced to ye end for wch he formed them, & that these primitive particles being solids are incomparably harder then any porous bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces: no ordinary power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first creation. While the particles continue entire they may compose bodies of one & the same nature & texture in all ages: but should they weare away, or break in pieces, the nature of things depending on them, would be changed. Water & Earth composed of old worn particles & fragments of particles would not be of the same nature & texture now with water & earth composed of entire particles in the beginning. And therefore that nature may be lasting, the changes of corporeal things are to be placed only in the various separations & new associations & motions of these permanent particles; compound bodies being apt to break, not in the midst of solid particles, but where those particles are laid together not & only touch in a few points.

<283r>

It seems to me further that these particles have not only a Vis inertiæ accompanied with such passive laws of motion as naturally result from that force, but also that they are moved by certain active principles such as is that of Gravity & that which causes fermentation & the cohesion of bodies. These Principles I consider not as o|O|ccult Qualities supposed to result from the specific forms of things, but as general laws of nature by which the things [themselves are formed: their truth appearing to us by phænomena though their causes be not yet discovered. For these are manifest qualities, & their causes only are occult. To tell us that every species of things is endowed with an occult specific quality by which \it/ acts & produces manifest effets {sic}, is to tell us nothing: but to derive two or three general Principles of motion from Phænomena, & afterwards to tell us how the properties & actions of all corporeal things follow from those manifest Principles, would be a very great step in Philosophy, tho the causes of those Principles were not yet discovered: & therefore I scruple not to propose the Principles of motion above mentioned, they being of very general extent, & leave their causes to be found out.

Now by the help of these Principles all {motions} material things seem to have been composed of the hard & solid Particles above mentioned variously associated in the first creation by the counsell of an intelligent Agent. For it became him who created them to set them in order. And if he did so, it's unphilosophical to seek for any other origin of the world, or to pretend that it might arise out of a Chaos by the mere laws of nature; tho being once formed it may continue by those laws for many ages. For while Comets move in very excentric Orbs in all manner of positions, blind fate could never make all the Planets move one & the same way in Orbs concentrick, some inconsiderable irregularities excepted which may have risen from the mutual actions of Comets & Planets upon one another, & wch will be apt to increase till this Systeme wants a reformation. Such a wonderfull uniformity in the Planetary Systeme must be allowed the effect of choise. And so must the uniformity in the bodies of a|A|nimals, they having generally a right & a left side shaped alike & on either side of their bodies two leggs behind & either two arms or two leggs or two wings before upon their sholders & between their sholders a neck running down into a back bone & a head upon it, & in the head two ears, two eyes, a nose, a mouth & a tongue alike situated. Also the first contrivance of those very artificial parts of animals, the eyes, ears, brain, muscles, heart, Lungs, Midriff, Glands, Larynx, Hands, Wings, Swimming-bladders, natural Spectables, & other organs of sense & motion, & the Instinct of Brutes & Insects, can be the effect of nothing else then the wisdome & skill of a powerful ever living agent, who being in all places is more able by his Will to move the bounds of bodies within his boundless unorganized {illeg} uniform Sensorium & thereby to form & reform the parts of the Universe, then we are by our will to move the parts of or own bodies. And yet we are not to consider the world as the body of God or the parts several parts thereof as the parts of God. They He is an uniform Being void of Organs, Members, or Parts, & they are his Creatures subordinate to him & subservient to his will, & hi|e| is no more the soul of them then the Soul of a man is the Soul of the Species of things carried through the Organs of Sense into the place of its sensation, where b{illeg} it perceives them by means of its immediate presence without the intervention of any third thing. The Organs of Sense are not for enabling the soul to perceive the Species of things in its Sensorium, but only for conveying them thither, & God has no need of such Organs, he being every \where/ present to the things themselves. And since space is divisible in infinitum & matter is not necessarily in all places, it mast|y| be also allowed that God is able to create matter particles o{f} <284r> matter of several sizes & figures & in several proportions to space, & perhaps of different densities & forces, & thereby to vary the Laws of Nature, & make worlds of several sorts in several parts of the Universe. At least I see nothing of contradiction in all this.

As in Mathematicks so in Natural Philosophy the investigation of difficult things by the Method of Analysis ought ever to precede the method of composition. This Analysis consists in making Experiments & observations & in drawing general conclusions from them by Induction, & admitting of no objections against the Conclusions but such as are taken from experiments or other certain truths. For Hypotheses are not to be regarded in experimental Philosophy. And altho the arguing from experiments & observations by Induction be no demonstration of general {C} Conclusions yet it is the best way of arguing which the nature of things admits of, & may be looked upon as so much the stronger by how much the Induction is more general And if no exception occur from Phænomena the conclusion may be pronounced generally. But if at any time afterwards any exception \shall/ occur from experiments, it may then begin to be pronounced with such exceptions as occur. By this way of Analysis we may proceed from compositions|unds| to ingredients, & from motions to the forces producing them, & in general from effects to their causes, & from particular causes to more general ones, till the Argument end in the most general. This is the Method of Analysis: & the Synthesis consists in assuming the causes discovered & established as Principles, & by them explaining the Phenomena proceeding from them, & proving the explanations.

In the two first books of these Opticks, I proceeded by this Analysis to discover & prove the original differences of they rays of light in respect of refrangibility, reflexibility, & colour, & their alternate fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission, & the properties of bodies both opake & pellucid on which their reflexions & colours depend. And these discoveries being proved may be assumed in the method of Composition for explaining the Phænomena arising from them: {illeg} an instance of which Method I gave in the end of the first Book. In this third Book I have only begun the Analysis of what remains to be discovered about light & its effects upon the frame of nature, hinting several things about it & leaving the hints to be examined & improved by the farther experiments & observations of such as are inquisitive. And if natural Philosophy in all its parts, by pursuing this method, shall at length be perfected, the bounds of moral Philosophy will be also enlarged. For so far as we can know by Natural Philosophy what is the first Cause, what power he has over us, & what benefits we receive from him, so far our duty towards him as well as that towards one another, will appear to us by the light of Nature. And no doubt, if the worship of fals Gods had not blinded the heathen, their moral Philosophy would have gone further then to the four c|C|ardinal v|V|ertues; & instead of teaching the transmigration of souls & to worship the Sun |&| Moon & dead Heroes, they would have taught us to worship our true Author & Benefactor.

<285r>

All these things being considered it seems to me that God [Deus O. M.] in ye beginning created | formed matter in solid {illeg} massy hard impenetrable moveable particles of such sizes & figures & with such other properties & in such proportion to space as most conduced to the end for wch he created them. And that these primitive particles being solids are incomparably harder then any porous bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to weare or break in pieces: no ordinary power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first creation. While these particles continue entire they may compose bodies of the same nature & texture in all ages: but should they weare \away/ or break in pieces, the nature of things depending on them would be changed. Water & Earth composed of old worn particles & fragments of particles would not be of the same nature & texture now &|w|ith water & earth composed of entire particles in the beginning. And therefore that nature may be lasting, the changes of \corporeal/ things are to be placed only in ye various separations & \&/, new associations & motions of these permanent particles, \compound/ |bodies being apt to break not in the midst of solid particles but where those particles are laid together & only touch in a few points.|

{illeg} It seems to me further that these permanent particles have not only a Vis inertiæ accompanied \accompanied/ wth such passive laws of motion as naturally result from that force, but also that they are endowed with \accompanied moved by/ certain active principles of motion such as is that of Gravity & that wch causes fermentation & the cohesion of bodies. These Principles I consider not as occult q|Q|ualities resulting from which \supposed to/ \are supposed to/ resulting from the specific forms of things but as general Laws of Nature from whence the forms |by wch ye things| themselves result. \are formed: Their Truth appearing to us by phænomena, though their causes be nt yt explaind./ To tell us that every species of things is endowed wth an occult \specificly/ Quality by wch it acts, is to tell us nothing; but to derive two or three general Principles of motion from Phænomena, & afterwards to tell us how the properties & actions of all corporeal things follow from those \manifest/ Principles, would be a very great step in Philosophy, tho the \occult/ causes of those Principles were not yet discovered: & therefore I scruple not to propose the Principles of motion above mentioned, they being of very general extent.

Now by the help of these Principles all material things seem to have been composed of the hard & solid Particles above mentioned variously associated in the first creation, bu|y|t not without the {illeg} counsel of an intelligent a|A|gent. For it became him who created them to set them in order. And if he did so, it's unphilosophical to seek for any other origin of the world, or to pretend that it might arise out of a Chaos by the mere laws of Nature; tho being once formed it may continue by those laws for many ages. For while Comets move in very excentrick Orbs in all manner of positions, blind fate could never make all the Planets move one & the same way in orbs concentrick, some inconsiderable irregularities excepted wch may have risen from the mutual actions of Comets & Planets upon one another, & wch will be apt to increase till this Systeme wants a reformation. Such a <286r> wonderful uniformity in the Planetary Systeme must be allowed the effect of choise. And so must the uniformity \{illeg}/ in the bodies of Animals, they having generaly a right side & a left side shaped alike & on either {illeg} |side| of their bodies two leggs behind & \either/ two arms or two leggs or two wings before upon their shoulders, & between their shoulders a neck with a head upon it, & in the head two ears, two eyes, a nose, a mouth & a tongue alike situated. Also the first contrivance of those very artificial parts of animals, the \Joynts, Muscles, Glands,/ Eyes, Ears, Brain, \Nerves, Muscles, Glands,/ heart, Lungs, Midriff, \Larynx,/ Hands, Wings, Swimming bladders, natural Spactacles, & other Organs of sense \{memory}/ & motion, & the instinct of Brutes & Insects, can be the effect of nothing else then the wisdome & skill of a powerfull ever living Agent; who is being indivisibly in all places, after some such manner as that wch thinks in us is in all parts of our sensorium, perceives all things accurately in their true solid dimensions by the immediate presenc{e} of the things themselves, while that wch thinks in us perceives only the superficial pictures of the things made in our sensorium by motion conveyed thither from the things; & who is more able by his will to move the bodies |wth|in his boundless \uniform unorganized/ sensorium & thereby to forme & reform the parts of the Universe, then we are by our will to move \the parts of/ our bodies own bodies. \/ < insertion from the middle of f 285v > ✝And yet we are not to consider the world as the body of God or the several parts thereof as the parts of God. They are his creatures subordinate to him & subservient to his will. And he is no more the soul of them then the soul of a man is the soul of th{illeg}|e|{illeg} species of things carried through the Organs of sensa|e|tion into the place \of sensation/ where the soul \by means of its {presenc} immediate presence/ perceives them. < text from f 286r resumes > And since space is divisible in infinitum & matter is not necessarily in all places, it must be also allowed that God is able to create particles of matter of several sizes & figures & \in several proportions to space & perhaps of different densities & forces, &/ thereby to vary the laws of Nature & make worlds of different sizes \sorts/ in several parts of the Universe. At least I see nothing of contradiction in all this.

As in Mathematicks so in Natural Philosophy the investigation of difficult things by the method of Analysis ought ever to precede the{illeg} \method of/ Composition. This Analysis consists in arguing \making experiments & observations & in arguing by them/ from compositions to ingredients & from motions to the forces producing them & in general from Phænomena \& effects/ to their causes & from particular causes to more general ones, till the Argument end in the most general: The Synthesis \consists/ in assuming the causes discovered & established, as Principles; of Phæno & by them explaining the Phænomena proceeding from them, & proving the explanations. In the two first Books of these Opticks I proceeded by Analysis to discover & prove the original differences of the rays of light in respect of refrangibility reflexibility & colour & their alternate fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission & the properties of bodies both opake & pellucid on which their reflexions & colours depend: & these discoveries being proved may be assumed as Principles in the method of Composition for explaining the phænomena arising from them them: an instance of wch Method I gave in the end of the first Book. In this third Book I have only begun the Analysis of what remains to be discovered about light & its effects upon the frame of Nature, hinting several things about it & leaving the hints to be examined & improved by the further experiments & observations of such as are inquisitive. And if Natural Philosophy in all its parts, by pursuing this Method, shall at length be perfected, the bounds of Moral Philosophy will be also enlarged. For so far as we can know by Natural Philosophy what power |is| the first Cause, \what power he/ has over us, & what benefits we receive from him, so far or duty towards him as well as that towards one another will appear to us by the light of Nature. And no doubt, if the worship of false Gods had not blinded the Heathens, their Moral Philosophy would have gone further then to the four Cardinal Vertues. & instead of teaching us \the transmigration of Souls, &/ to worship the Sun & Moon & dead Heroes, they would have tought us to worship or true \Author &/ Benefactor.

<287r>

Qu. 20. Are not the rays of light very small bodies refracted by means of certain attractions which intercede then & the parts of pellucid bodies? For we have s The common opinions are that light is made either by pression or motion propagated through a fluid or by bodies projected. If it consisted only in pression propagated without actual motion, it would not be able to agitate & heate the bodies wch refract & reflect it. If it consisted in motion propagated \to all distances/ in an instant, it would require an infinite force to generate that motion. Light moves in right lines without bending or spreading into the shadow beyond the bounds of those right lines in wch it begins to move. But pression or motion cannot be propagated in a fluid in right lines beyond an obstacle wch stops part of the motion; but bends & spreads every way into the quiescent medium wch lies beyond the obstacle. {illeg} Gravity tends downw{illeg}|a|rds, but the pressure of water arising from gravity tends every way with equal force & is propagated as readily & with as much force \side ways as downwards &/ through crooked passages as through streight ones. The waves of on the surface of water passing by the sides of a broad obstacle bend & dilate themselves gradually into the quiet water behind the obstacle. The waves \pulses/ or vibrations of the Air wherein sounds consist bend manifestly tho not so much as the waves of water. For a Bell or a Canon may be heard beyond a hill wch intercepts the sight of the sounding body & sounds are propagated as readily through crooked pipes as through streight ones. But light is never known to follow crooked passages nor to bend into the shadow For the fixt stars by the interposition of any of the Planets cease to be seen & so do the parts of the Sun by the interposition of the Moon Mercury or Venus. The rays wch pass very neare to ye edges of bodies any body are bent a little by the action of the body as we shewed above; but this bending is not towards but from the shadow & is performed only in the passage of the ray by the body. So soon as the ray is past the body it goes right on.

To explain the double \unusual/ refraction of Island-Crystal by pression or motion propagated has not hitherto been attempted (to my knowledge) except by Hugenius who for that end supposed two several vibrating Mediums |within that crystal:| but when he found tried the refractions in two successive pieces of \yt/ crystal & found them such as is mentioned in the two last preceding Questions; he confest himself at a loss for explaining them: For pressions or motions propagated from a shining body through an uniform medium must be on all sides alike: whereas by those experiments it appears that ye rays of light have different properties in their different sides. He suspected that the pulses of Æther in passing through the first crystal might receive certain new modifications wch might determin them to be propagated in this or that Medium \within the second crystal/ according to the position of that second crystal: but what modifications those might be he could not say nor think of any thing satisfactory in this point.: And its more difficult to think \conceive/ how such modifications can be in the rays originally, if light be nothing else then pression or motion propagated through fluids. For the refractions refle{illeg}|x|{illeg}ions <288r> inflexions & colours of light depend on such properties as are in the rays originaly & suffer no change by the passing of the rays through several mediums: & therefore all Hypotheses are to be laid aside in wch those phænomena are derived from new modifications of the rays.

By the regular & very lasting motions of Comets & Planets through the heavens in all manner of positions its manifest that the heavens are void of all sensible resistence [& therefore may let the rays of light go through them in right lines with an uniform motion to very great distances, although those rays should be bodies]. The resistance of fluid Mediums arises partly from the attrition of the parts of the Medium & principally from the Vis inertiæ of the matter. That part of the resistance which arises from the attrition of the parts may be diminished by dividing the matter into smaller parts & making the parts more smooth & slippery: but that part of the resistance wch arises from the Vis inertiæ is proportional to the density of the matter & cannot be diminished by dividing the matter nor by any other means then by decreasing the density. \And for these reasons the density of fluid Mediums is very nearly proportional to their resistance/ Water is 13 or 14 times {illeg} lighter then water \Quicksilver/, & by consequence 13 or 14 times rarer, & it's resistance is less then that of Quicksilver in the same proportion or thereabouts \as I have found by Pendulums/. The \op/ Air \in wch we breath./ \The open Air in wch we breath/ is eight or nine hundred times lighter then water, & by consequence 8 or 900 \eight or nine hundred/ times rarer, & accordingly its resistance is less then that of water in the same proportion or thereabouts \as I have also found by Pendulums./. And the thinner the Air the less its resistance |And if the Air be made still thinner & thinner its resistance becomes less & less untill it becomes insensible|. < insertion from the middle of f 287v > And in thinner Air the resistance is still less & by rarefying the air becomes at length insensible. < text from f 288r resumes > For feathers falling in the open Air meet with great resistance but in a tall glass wall emptied of Air they fall as fast as lead or gold as I have seen tried several times. And the heavens are emptier of Air then any Vacuum we can make below & therefore have less resistance. Liquors wch differ not much in density, as water spirit of wine spirit of Turpentine, hot oyle, differ not much in resistance, & the reason is because their rersistances arise chiefly from their Vis inertiæ. Heat increases fluidity & makes many bodies fluid wch are solid \not fluid/ in cold \& accordingly decreases their resistance as may be tried in oyle/ but decreases not the resistance of water considerably \as it would do if any great part of its resistance arose from the attrition or tenacity of its parts/, & therefore the vis inertiæ resistence of water arises chiefly from the Vis inertiæ; & \by consequence/ if the heavens were as dense as water they would not have much less resistence then water, if as dense as quicksilver they would not have much less resistence then quicksilver, if absolutely dense or full of matter without any Vacuum, let the matter be never so fluid, they would have a greater resistance then Mercury \Quicksilver/. A solid globe in such a Medium would lose above half its motion in moving less then three times the length of its diameter & a globe not solid would be retarded sooner. And therefore to make way for the lasting motions of Comets & Planets its necessary to empty the heavens of all matter except perhaps some very thin vapors \steams or effluia {sic} air or æther/ arising from the Atmospheres of the Earth Planets & Comets. Such matter is of no use for explaining the Phenomena of nature, the motions of the Planets & Comets being better explained without it by gravity without it, & gravity not being hitherto explained by it. It serves only to disturbe & retard the motions of those great bodies & make the frame of nature languish & in the pores of bodies it serves only to stop the vibrating motions of their parts \wherein their heat & activity consists./. And as it is of no use & hinders the operations of nature \& makes her languish/ so there is no evidence for its existence; & therefore it ought to be rejected. And if it be rejected, the Hypotheses that light consists in pression or motion propagated <289r> through such a Medium are rejected with it. And for rejecting such a Medium we have \also/ the authority of those the oldest & most celebrated Philosophers of Greece & Phenicia, \(Mochas, Phirecides, Thales, Pythagoras/ who made a Vacuum, Atoms & the gravity of Atoms the first principles of their philosophy

I have therefore proposed the Question whether the rays of light may not be small bodies emitted by shining substances. Certainly the resemblance between them \rays & bodies such bodies/ is very great. For such \such/ bodies will pass through uniform Mediums in right lines without bending into the shadow wch is the property of the rays of light. Pellucid substances act upon the rays of light at a distance in refracting reflecting & inflecting them, & the rays mutually agitate the parts of those substances at a distance for heating them, & this action & reaction very much resembles an attractive force. If refraction be performed by attraction of the rays, the sines of incidence must be to the sines of refraction in a given proportion as we shewed in or Principles of Philosophy; & this Rule is true by experience. If the rays of light in going out of a glass into a Vacuum fall too obliquely on the Vacuum, they are totaly reflected wch seems to argue an attraction of the glass. Colours & Refractions depend not on new modifications of light but on the original & unchangeable properties of its rays, & such properties are best conserved in bodies projected. Pressions & motions are apt to receive new modifications in passing through several Mediums but the properties of bodies projected will scarce be altered thereby. Nothing more is requisite for producing all the variety of colours & degrees of refrangibility then that the rays be bodies of different sizes the least of wch \may/ make violet the \weakest &/ darkest of colours & be more easily diverted by refracting surfaces from the right course, & the rest, as they are bigger & bigger may make the \stronger &/ more lucid colours, blue green yellow & red & be more & more difficultly diverted. And lastly the unusual refraction of Island Crystal looks very much as if it were performed by some kind of polar \attractive/ vertue \attraction/ \lodged in certain sides/ both {illeg}|of| the rays & i|o|f the particles of the crystall. For were it not for some kind of polar \disposition or/ vertue in \some sides of/ the particles of the crystal wch {derives} \is not in their other sides & wch inclines & bends/ the rays towards the coasts of unusual refraction the rays \wch fall perpendicularly on the crystal/ would not be refracted towards that coast when they fall perpendicularly on the glass \crystal/ |rather then towards any other coast, Both at their incidence & at their emergence, so as to emerge perpendicularly by a contrary situation of ye coast of unusual refraction at the second surface; the crystal acting upon the rays after they have past through it & are emerging into ye air or if you please into a vacuum.| And since the crystal by this |disposition or| vertue does not act upon the rays unless when \one of/ their sides of unusual refraction are look | are \turned/ towards that coast this argues a vertue \or disposition/ in those sides of the rays which answers to & sympathizes with that vertue \or disposition/ of the crystal, as the poles of two Magnets answer one to another. And as magnetism is not found in all bodies may be intended & remitted & is found only in the Magnet & in iron, so this vertue of refracting the perpendicular rays is greater in Island Crystal less in Crystal of the rock & is not yet found in other bodies. But what ever this vertue be <290r> tis very difficult to conceive how the rays of light, unless they be bodies, can have a permanent vertue in two of their sides opposite one to another wch is not in their other sides, & this without any dependence on the Medium through wch they are propagated; the like sides of several rays not looking all towards the same coast but being turned several ways \before their incidence on the first crystal,/ & looking indifferently towards any coast as ye rays happen to be emitted from shining substances in several positions, & accordingly as they are turned to this or that coast, being refracted at their incidence on ye first crystal \& again at their emergence out of it/ some after the usual & some after the unusual manner.

<291r>

What is it by means of wch bodies act on one another at a distance. |And| To what Agent did the Ancients attribut the gravity of their atoms. And is there not something in all space {illeg} of matter ||Or| And what did they mean by calling God an harmony &| comparing him & the material part \corporeal part of the Universe to the/ corporeal world \matter/ to ye God Pan & his Pipe.

Can any space be wthout something \in it/ & what is that something in space void of matter [& what are its properties & operations on matter]

When water Oyle of Vitriol is run per deliquium & in destillation the water ascends difficultly & brings over with it a good pa some part of ye oyle of Vitriol in the form of spirit of Vitriol & this spirit being poured upon iron copper or salt of tartar unites with the body & lets go the water: does not this shew that the acid spirit is attracted \by the water &/ more \attracted/ by the fixt body then by the water & therefore lets go the water to close with the fixt body. And is it not for the same reason that the water & acid spirits in Vinegar, Aqua fortis or Spirit of salt the water & acid spirits cohere & destill \rise/ d|t|ogether in destillation; but if the menstruum be poured on salt of tartar of on Lead or iron or any fixt body wch it can dissolve the acid by a stronger attraction lets go the adheres to ye body & lets go the water. And it|s| it not from

of tartar or quick lime the sulphur by a stronger attraction lets go ye Mercury & to \& by a stronger attraction u/ univ|t|es with ye fixt d|b|ody & that in \the/ sublimation|ing| \{illeg}/ Mercury sublimate \is sublimed/ from or from Regulus of the spirit of salt lets go ye & by a stronger attraction unites wth ye |antimonial| metall & destills with it till stays with it till the heat be big enough to make them both ascend together & then subl carries up the metal in the form of a \very flui/ fusible salt called butter of Antimony, although the Antimony will \alone {wo}uld/ /will\ not ascend, alone \alone/ being almost as fixed as lead.

When aqua fortis dissolves silver & not gold & aqua regis dissolves gold & not silver may it not be said that Aqua fortis is subtile enough to penetrate as well as silver but wants the attractive force wch \to/ give it entrance & that Aqua Regis is subtile enough to enter \penetrate/ silver but wants the attractive force to give it entrance. For aqua Regis is compounded of Aqua fortis [wch is subtile enough to enter silver:] &: common salt added to Aqua fortis enables the menstruum to dissolve gold tho the common salt be a gross body. When therefore \When therefore And/ spirit of salt pred|c|ipitates silver out of Aqua fortis by {illeg} \is it not {illeg} by/ attracting \& {illeg} mixing wth/ ye aqua fortis & repelling the silver. And when water precipitates Antimony out of sublimate of Antimony & Salarmoniac or out of butter of Antimony, is it not \done/ by attracting & dissolving \& weakening/ the salarmoniac or the spirit of salt & repelling the Antimony. Is it not therefore \also/ for want of an attractive vertue between the parts of water & oyle, of Quicksilver & Antimony, Lead & Iron that these substances do not mix & by several degrees of an \a strong/ attractive vertue that some bodies mix readily as Quicksilver & Tin, Antimony & Iron, Water & salts & \by a weaker one/ that others mix difficultly as {Q}uicksilver & copper? And is it not \in general/ from ye same principle that heat congregates homogeneal th{illeg} bodies & seperates heterogeneal ones.

When Arsnick with soap — — — in sublimation.

When Mercury sublimate sublimed wth fresh Mercury becomes dulcis — — — — more strongly. by adhering strongly to the metal

When

|And| Does not the sharp & pungent tasts of acids arise from the strong attraction whereby the p|a|cid particles rush upon the p & agitate the particles of the tongue? For \And/ when metals are dissolved in acids menstruums, \do not/ the acids adhering to the metallic particles \must loose/ loose \much of/ their activity & \act in a different manner & so that/ the compound has a different tast much milder then before. & sometimes a sweet one. And if the acids be in too small a proportion to make the compound dissolvable in water, the compound remains \will it not the acid become unactive & lose its will d{illeg} not acid loose its {be} tast & the compound be/ a tastles earth? For such things as are not dissolvable by the moisture of the tongue cannot act not upon the tast

As

<291v>

And from ye endeavour of ye particles of Air to reced from one|gros| another \bodies/ it comes to pass that Air is rarer in \very/ slender pipes of glass then in free spaces &                                                 by reason of its {rarify} presses less upon the surface of water into wch the lower end of ye pipe is dipt, then air withou ye air presses upon it & so gives leave to air \ye water/ to ascend in the pipes wch is the ground of philtration.

Qu. 21. Do not bodies & light mutualy change into one another. And {are} are not not bodies composed either wholy or in great measure from \composed of/ the particles of light And do \may/ not bodies in great measure receive their act most active powers from the particles of light of wch they are composed enter their composition? For all \fixt/ bodies emit light so long as are \they continue/ sufficiently hot & light light \mutualy/ stops in bodies as often as its rays strike upon their parts, as we shewed above. I know no body less apt to shine then water & yet water by frequent destillations passes \changes/ into {illeg} fixed earth & this earth shines as much by heat as any other body. The changing of bodies into light & light into bodies s{illeg} is very conformable to the course of nature which seems to delight in transmutations. Water wch is a \very/ fluid volatile tastles salt she changes by heat into vapour wch is {illeg} by in ye form of air \wch is a sort of air/ & by cold into into \ice wch is/ a hard pellucid fus brittle tast fusible stone, & this stone returns into water by heat & vapour returns into water by cold. Earth by heat becomes fire & by cold returns into earth. Dense bodies by fermentation yeild or turn into {illeg} air & {illeg} dry fumes \exhalations/ & return {illeg} \rarefy into \several sorts of / aer & this aer/ & the|i|se aereal \substance/ by fermentation \& sometimes without it/ return into dense bodies. [Quicksilver dropt into a red hot earthen {r}etort ascends in ye form of water vapour wch recondenses into a pellucid liquor like common water in appearance & this liquor being left a few days in the cold air returns in Quicksilver]. All Animals & vegetables Birds Beasts & Fishes, Trees & other Vegetables with their several parts grow out of water & watry tinctures & by putrefaction return again into watry substances. And water standing a few days in the open Air yeilds a tincture wch (like that of Mault) by standing longer lets yeilds a sediment & a spirit, but before putrefaction is fit nourishment for animals & vegetables And \the/ if bodies turn into light & light return into bodies, 'tis a transmutation like the {illeg}st \not/ \agreable to ye proceeding/ of Natures works in the rest of her works.

Mercury appears sometimes in the form of a fluid ponderous opake bright |tastles| Metal, \sometimes in the form of a hard metal brittle metal/ sometimes in the form of a corrosive pellucid salt called sublimate or in |yt| the of a tastles pellucid volatile earth called Mercurius dulcis, or of an a red opake volatile body ca \volatile/ earth called cinnaber or of a red \or white/ precipitate, or in the form \of a fluid salt or in that/ of air or |of| common water \/ < insertion from f 292r > for & being dropt into a red hot earthen Retort it destills in the form of common water. < text from f 291v resumes > & after all these & other changes it returns \again/ into Mercury \/ < insertion from f 292r > ‡ & being agitated in vacuo it shines < text from f 291v resumes > .

Now since light is the most active of all bodies known to us, & enters the composition of all natural bodies, why may reccon it \not be/ the chief principle of activity in bodies them? Attraction ought to be strongest in the smallest particles {illeg} in proportion to their bulk. Tis much stronger in small magnets in proportion {to} their bulk then in great ones. And considering how soft the \much the/ rays of ligh{t are} bent at {the}ir entrance into pellucid bodies, we may reccon that ye attri|a|ctive power of {the r}ay of light in proportion to its bulk |the body| is as much greater then the gravity of a projectile in proportion to its bulk \body/ as the bent velocity of the ray of light is greater then the velocity of the projectile & the bent \of the ray/ greater then the bent of the line of \described by/ the projectile, together supposing the inclination of the ray to refracting surface & that of ye projectile to ye Horizon to be alike. And by this proportion I reccon the \attractive force of/ rays of light above a million of million of time ten hundred thousand \thousand/ millions of times greater then the force force whereby bodies gravitate on ye surface of this earth in projortion {sic} to the matter in them. \supposing that light comes from the Sun to us in about 7 minutes of an hour./ And so great a force in the rays {illeg} cannot but have a very great effect upon the particles of matter wth which they are compounded, for causing them particles to attract one another. Let us therefore see if they {illeg} be \have/ not such \mutual/ attractions among \between/ the particles of matter.

<292r>

supposing the bodies of equal vertue when equal {illeg} \Now attraction \in bodies of the same kind & vertue/ is strongest in the smallest bodies/ of the same kind in proportion to their bulk. It is \found/ stronger in small magnets \for their weight/ then in great ones. weight for weight And the {sic} |For the parts of small ones being close together unite their forces more easily. And therefore the| rays of light being the smallest bodies known to us, we may expect to find it \their attraction/ very strong in them. And how strong it is may be gathered something nearely by this Rule. The attraction of a ray of light in proportion to its body is to ye gravity of a projectile in proportion to its body, as in a compound ratio of the velocity of the ray of light to the velocity of the projectile & of the bent of the ray to the bent of the projetile, supposing the

We have laid down reasons why shewed that the attraction of

The smallest particles of matter may cohere by the strongest attractions & compose bigger particles of weaker vertue & the many of these may cohere & compose \a/ bigger particles whose vertue is still weaker & so on for divers successions untill the progression end in the biggest particles on which the operations in Chymistry & the colours of natural bodies depend, & wch by cohering together compose bodies of a sensible magnitude.

Since metals dissolve in acids are satiated with \ attract but/ a smal quantity of \the/ acid, their attractive force can reach but to a small distance & the from them. And as in Algebra where affirmative quantities vanish & cease, there negative ones begin so in Mechanicks where attraction ceases there a repulsive vertue ought to begin. [By this vertue the rays of light are emitted from shining substances & reflected by bodies & by \the/ bodies |they fall upon| & in their passage by the sides of bodies \they are/ bent from the body. And by the same power the particles of air recede from one another, flys walk upon water without wetting their feet, & all dry things are difficultly made to touch one another, & Object glasses of long Telescopes laid upon another will scarce touch so as to make the black spot appear (as is described in ye         Observation of ye 1t part of the second book) unless they be pressed together, & when ye pressure {illeg} ceases the glasses recede from one another.] And that there is such a verture {sic} seems to follow from the reflection & inflexion of light. For {illeg} in both these cases the rays of light are repelled {illeg} without the immediate contact of the reflecting {illeg} or inflecting body. It seems also to follow from the emission of of {sic} light the ray so soon as it is shaken off from a shining body from \by/ the vibrating motion of the{se} parts \of the body/ & gets beyond the reach of attraction being driven away wth exceeding great velocity. For that force wch {illeg} \is great enough to/ turn it back in reflection may be great enought to give it its motion in emission. It seems to follow also from the production of air vapour the particles of such bodies when shaken off \from ye bodies/ by heat &|o|r fermentation, so soon as they are beyond the reach of attraction flying recedi|e|ng from ye bodies & \also/ from one another with great strength & keepi|e|ng at a distance. For The particles of fluids wch by reason & the \do not adhere too strongly to one another & are of such a/ smallness as |renders them| most susceptible of those agitations wch {them} \keep liquor/ in a fluor, being most easily rarefied, or to use the language of ye Chemists, being most volatile. These rarefy \into vapor/ by \an easy/ heat & condense with by cold: but those wch are larger & less susceptible of agitation or cohere by a stronger attraction are not seperated without a stronger \heat/ or perhaps not without fermentation. And these last are the bodies wch Chemists called \fixed/ & wch by|e|ing rarefied become true permanent air; those particles receding from one another with the greatest force wch upon contact cohere most strongly. And because the particles of perment {sic} air are grosser & denser then those of vapors, thence it is that true air is more ponderous the {sic} vapour & that a moist Atmosphere is lighter then a dry one, so quantity for quantity, as {illeg}ned by the Barometer.

<292v>

The Anticat Philosphers who [held atoms, that \& vacuum/ & attributed to every atom a gravita|y|ting power proportional to ye matter conteined in it, knew of understanding by atoms the least particles of matter \& accounting them/ indivisible not by reason of their littleness but by reason of their being solids void of all parts,] \And for rejecting such a Medium we have ye authority of those oldest & most celebrated Philosophers who/ made Atoms, Vacuum & |ye| Gravity \of Atoms/ the first principles of their Philosophy, ascribing to understanding by atoms the least particles of matter & accounting them indivisible not by reason of their littleness \but/ by|e|cause of their being solids void of all {pores}, & attributing to every atom a gravity proportional to ye quantity of its matter, without assigning the cause of such a gravity.

1 Move in right lines. 4 reflected entire at going out of glass. 5 Original properties immutable no new modifications. 3 double proportion of sines. 2 act at a distance. 6 double refraction.

It deserves therefore to be considered \I have therefor proposed the Question/ whether \the rays of/ light may not be small bodies trayected from the \emitted by/ shinning substances. & that for these reasons. 1 because |{illeg} Certainly the resemblance between them is very great.| For such bodies will pass through uniform Mediums in right lines without bending into ye shadow wch is the property of ye rays of light. 2 because Bodies \Pellucid substances/ act upon the rays of light at a distance in {re}fracting reflecting & inflecting them, wch & the rays mutually agitate the parts of bodies \those substances/ at a distance for heating them wch \& this/ action & reaction very much resembles an attractives force between the rays & the particles of refracting bodies 3 Because If refraction be performed by attraction of ye rays, the sines of incidence must be to the sines of refraction |in a given proportion| as we shewed in or Principles: & a|A|nd this Rule is true by experience. 4 Because |If| The rays of light in going out of glass if they \into a{illeg} vacuum/ fall too obliquely on ye glass are air \vacuum they/ are totally reflected, [the attraction of ye glass seeming to overcome the force of ye ray to on into Air, oblique rays more directly them] wch seems to be by the attraction of yeglass. 5 Because The \may be by {them} \which seems to an/ attraction of the glass/ Colours & refractions of light depend \not on new modifications of light but/ {illeg}upon the original \& unchangeable/ properties of its rays without |{illeg}| any new modifications impressed on them, & such properties are best conserved in bodies projected. Pressions & motions may may \are apt to/ receive new modifications in passing through several mediums but \the properties of/ bodies projected r{illeg} are not will scarce be altered 6 The thereby. Nothing more is requisite for ye production of {all} colours & diversity of colours & \degrees of/ refrangibility |then| but that the rays be bodies of different sizes, the least of wch may make \violet/ the darkest \of/ colours violet, & be most easily diverted \by refraction/ from the right course & the rest as they are bigger & bigger may make the rest of ye \more lucid/ colours blue green yellow & red, & be more & more difficultly diverted by the refracting surface. And lastly the unusual refraction of Island Crystal looks very much as if it was performed by some kind of polar vertue both in the rays & in the particles of the crystal. For were it not for some kind of polar vertue in the rays particles of ye crystal the r wch draws the rays towards the coast of unusual refraction the rays would not be refracted towards that coast when they fall perpendicularly on ye glass. And were since the crystal by this vertue does not act upon ye rays unless when their sides of unusual refraction are towards that coast this argues a virtue in those two sides of ye rays wch answers to yt vertue of ye particles of ye crystal as the poles of two Magnets answer \one/ to another And as Magnetism is not found in all bodies |& may be intended & remitted| so this vertue of refracting the perpendicular rays is not found in all refracting substances & is greater in Isl \greater in Island Crystal/ less in Crystal of the rock. then in Island Crystal But what ever this vertue be tis very difficult to conceive how the rays of light unless they be bodies can have {convert} |a| perma\ne/nt \original/ vertue in two of their sides opposite one to another wch is not in their other two sides; & before their incidence on ye first glas crystal be turned all manner of ways as they happen to be \casually/ emitted from shining substances & this without any dependance on the \nature of the/ Medium through wch they are propagated; the like sides of several rays looking towards several coasts before their incidence on the first glass \crystal/, & being turned indifferently {to} \towards/ any coast as the rays happen to be emitted from shining substance in several positions, & accordingly \as they are turned to this or that/ being refracted by \at their incidence on/ the first crystal some after the unusual & some after the usual manner

<293r>

And do not hot bodies communicate their heat to contiguous cold ones by the vibrations of this Medium propagated from them into the cold ones. 1 And do not the vibrations of this Medium in hot bodies contribute to the duration of their heat?

Pag. 133. lin. ult. After the word [parts?] add. And do not all bodies which abound with terrestrial parts & especially with suphureous ones, emit light as often as those parts are sufficiently agitated; whether that agitation be made by heat, or by friction or percussion or putrefaction or by any vital motion \as in glow worms & the eyes of some animals or by any other cause/ or any other cause? as for instance, Sea-water in a {illeg} raging storm, quicksilver agitated in vacuo; the back of a Cat or neck of a horse obliquely struck or rubbed in a dark place; wood flesh & fishes while they putrefy; Vapors arising from putrid waters usually called Ignes fatui; stacks of \moist/ hay or corn in fermentation growing hot by fermentation; \glow worms & the eyes of some animals by vital motions;/ the vulgar Phosphorus agitated by the attrition of any body or by the acid particles of the Air; |Ambar &| some Diamonds by striking pressing or rubbing them; scrapings of steel struck off with a flint; iron hammered very nimbly till it becomes red hot it becomes so hot as to kindle sulphur thrown upon it; the axe trees of charion|t|s taking fire by the rapid rotation of the wheels; and some liquors mixed with one another whose particles come together with an impetus; as Oyl of Vitriol destilled from its weight of Nitre & then mixed with twice its weight of Oyle of Annisseeds. So also a hollow globe of glass about 8 or 10 inches in diameter, being \put into a frame where it may be/ turned swiftly round its axis, will |in turning| shine where it rubs against the palm of ones hand \applied to it/, & if at the same time a piece of white paper or white cloth or the end of ones finger be held at the distance of about a quarter of an inch or half an inch from the glass that part of the glass where it is most in motion, the electric vapour which is excited by the friction of the glass against the hand, will by dashing against the white paper cloth or finger be put into such an agitation as to emit light & make the white paper, cloth or finger appear lucid like a glow worm.

Pag. 134 lin. ult. After the word [flame] add: When Gun-powder takes fire it goes away into flaming smoak. For the charcoal & sulphur easily take fire, & set fire to ye Nitre, & the spirit of the Nitre being thereby rarefied into vapour, rushes out of the Nitre with explosion much after the manner that the vapour of water rushes out of an olipile; & the sulphur also being volatile is converted into vapor & thereby augments the explosion. Also the acid vapor of ye sulphur (namely that wch destills under a Bell into Oyle of Sulphur) entring violently into the fixt body of the Nitre, sets loose the spirit of the Nitre, & excites a great fermentation whereby the heat is further augmented & the fixt body of the Nitre is \also/ rarefied into fume, & the explosion thereby made more vehement & quick. For if {illeg} Salt of Tartar be mixed with Gun pouder & that mixture be warmed till it takes fire; the explosion will be \still/ more violent & quick \then that of Gunpowder alone/: which cannot be from any other cause then the action of the vapor of the Gunpouder upon the action of the salt of Tartar |whereby| |that salt is rarefied.| The explosion of Gunpowder arises therefore from the quick & violent wh action whereby all the mixture being quickly & vehemently heated, is rarefied & converted into fume or vapour: which vapour by the violence of that action is at the same time heated & becoming red hot appears in the form of flame.

Pag. 137 l{illeg} 135 lin. 16. After the words, [arise from them?] add For if water is made warm in any pellucid vessel, & the Aer is afterwards drawn out of the vessel, that water in the vacuum will bubble & boyle as vehemently as it would in the open aer in a vessel set upon the fire in the open till it conceives a much greater heat. For the weight of the incumbent Atmosphere keeps down the vapours & hinders the water from boyling untill it grow much hotter then is requisite to make it boyle in Vacuo. Also a mixture of Tinn & Lead being put upon a red hot iron in vacuo, emits a fume & also a <295r> flame: but the same mixture in the open air, by reason of the weight of the incumbent Atmosphere does not so much as emit any fume which can be perceived by \{illeg}/ sight. In like manner the great weight of the Atmosphere which lyes upon the globe of the Sun, may hinder bodies there from \rising &/ going away from the Sun in the form of vapours & fumes unless by means of a far greater heat then that which in the superficies of or Earth would \very/ easily turn them into vapours & fumes: and the same great weight may again condense those vapors & exhalations as soon as they shall ascend from the Sun, & make them \presently/ fall back again into the globe of the Sun, & by that action increase the heat of the Sun much after the manner that in our earth the Aer increases the heat of a culinary fire. And the same weight may hinder the globe of the Sun from diminishing being diminished unless \perhaps/ by the emission of light, & a very small quantity of vapors & exhalations.

Pag. 134 lin 1 insert Qu. 18B. Do not electric bodies by friction emit a subtile exhalation or spirit by which they perform their attractions? And is not this spirit of a very active nature & capable of emitting light by its agitations? And may not all bodies abound with such a spirit & shine by the agitations of this spirit \within them/ when sufficiently agitated by heat|ed|? For if a larg|long|e |& round cylindrical| piece of Ambar be rubbed nimbly it will shine in the dark & if when it is well rubbed the finger of a man be held neare it so as almost to touch it, the electric spirit will rush out of the Ambar {&} with a soft crackling noise like that of green leaves of trees thrown into a fire, & in rushing out it will also push against the hand so finger so as to be felt like the ends of hairs of a fine brush touching the finger. And when the globe of glass above mentioned is exhausted of air & nimbly turned round about its axis, & in turning round \is/ rubbed against the {illeg} inside of a man's hand so as to shine where it touches the hand. And when And the like happens in glass. If a cyl \long/ hollow tub{e} \of flint glass/ about an inch be rubbed nimbly with a paper held in the hand till the glass begins to grows warm, it will in rubbing emit light & the face or any other tender part of the skin being held neare that part of the glass where it has been most rubbed, the electric spirit which is excited by the friction & rushes out will rush out of the glass with a cracking noise & push against the skin so as to be felt, & in pushing emit light so as to make the skin shine like rotten wood or a glow worm. And if little \the glass was held neare/ pieces of leaf brass were scattered upon a table they would be pieces {w}ould b electric spirit wch issued out of the glass would put them pu into various brisk motions at the rea stir them at the distance of 6, 8 or 10 inches or a foot, & put them into various brisk motions, so making them sometimes leap towards the glass \& stick to it,/ sometimes leap from it with great force, & sometimes move towards it & from it several times with reciprocal motion, somtimes move in lines parall to the tube, sometimes remain suspended in the air, {&} {illeg} & sometimes move in various curve lines. Whis|c|h motions shew that this spirit is agitated in various manners like a wind. And if a \broad/ plate of glass be placed between the Tube & the pieces of brass, yet the Tube will attract them them {sic}, tho not so strongly as when the plate of glass is taken away. Which shews that the electrick spirit is so subtile as readily to pass through glass tho not so readily as through the Air. And whilst it pervades dense bodies so easily, why may it not be latent in them all in some measure or other, & tho those only emitt it by friction in which it abounds most copiously? And since it easily emits light by agitation, why may it not emit light in all dense bodies heated red hot & thereby cause them to shine?

<295v>

These And do these colours vanish in a second or two of time when the eye & the finger remain \{illeg}/ quite? But if while the eye is at rest the finger {illeg} is moved {illeg} forward & backward alternately, do they not appeare again so long as the And if the eye & the finger remain quiet these colours vanish {illeg}t in a second or two of time. But if the finger is moved backwards & forwards & \backwards/ alternately these colours appear again while the finger is in motion. Do not — — — stroke? And when a coale of fire moved nimbly in the circumference of a circle makes the whole circumference appear like a coale \circle/ of fire; is it not because the motions excited in the bottom of the eye by the rays of light are of a lasting nature & continue till the ca coale in going round returns to its former place? And are not these \lasting/ motions excited \by {illeg} or by press {illeg}/ in the bottom of the eye of a vibrating nature?

Qu. 17. |If a stone be thrown into stagnating water the vibrations undulations excited thereby continue for some time in the place where the stone fell into the water, & are propagated thence in concentric circles to great distances. And when| When light is refracted or reflec falls upon the surface of any pellucid body & is there refracted or reflected: do not the vibrations thereby excited in the refracting or reflecting Medium at the surface of the pellucid body continue as long as when they are excited in the bottom of the eye by the pressure \& motion/ of the finger or by the light wch comes from the \the/ coale of fire |in the experiments above mentioned?| And are not these Vibrations propagated from thence to great distances? And do they not overtake the rays of light, & by overtaking them successively do they not put the rays into the fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission described above?

Qu. 18. If \2/ two little Thermometers be placed |suspended| \1/ in two larg \& tall/ cylindrical vessels of glass inverted, \3/so as not to touch the vessels, & the air be drawn out of one of these vessels: When these vessels are carried into a warm place the Thermometer in vacuo will grow warm almost as soon as the other Thermometer which is not in vacuo. And when the vessels are carried into a cold place, they Thermometers will g in vacuo will grow cold almost as soon as the other Thermometer. Is not the heat \of the warm room/ conveyed through the Vacuum by the vibrations of a much subtiler Medium. then air wch after the Air is drawn out remains in the Vacuum. And is not this \Medium/ the Medium by wch light is refracted & reflected? And doth not light communicate heat to bodies by exciting vibrations in this Medium.

Qu. 19. When light {illeg} Doth not the refraction of light proceed from the different density of this Medium in different places |the light receding from the denser parts of the medium towards the rarer parts thereof? And is not| the density being /thereof\ greater in free space & open spaces \void of air & other grosser bodies/ then within the pores of water, glass, crystal & other compact bodies? [And do not the rays of light recede from the denser parts of the Medium towards the rarer & thereby become refracted?]

Qu. 20. Doth not this Medium in its pr passing out of water glass crystal & such lik other compact & dense bodies into empty spaces, grow denser & denser by degrees, & by that means refract the rays of light not in a point but by bending them gradually in curve lines? And doth not the graduall condensation of this Medium extend to some distance from the bodies & thereby cause the inflexions of the rays of light wch pass by the edges of compact bodies at some distance from the bodies.

Qu. 21. Is not this Medium [rarest {&} \within/ the densest bodies? such as are] And in passing from the Sun Moon Stars & Planets |And is it not much rarer within the Sun & Starrs \& Planets/ then &|without| them & in passing from them| to great distances from them, doth it not grow denser & denser perpetually & thereby cause the gravity of those \great/ bodies towards one another & of their parts towards the bodies, every body endeavouring to go from the denser parts of the Medium towards the rarer. For if a Medium grow be rarer at the distance of the tenth part of an inch from the Sun{illeg}s body, then at the distance of ten thousand thousand miles I {illeg} Saturn from the Sun & still much rarer at the very surface of the Suns body |be rarer within the suns body then at the distance of the tenth part of an inch from his body the Sun & if it be rarer at that distance from him then at the distance of Saturn from the Suns {illeg} surface of the suns body then within him| < insertion from f 293v > then at his surface & rarer there then at the distance of the tenth part of an inch from his body, & rarer then at the orb of Saturn: I see no reasō why the increase of density should stop any where, & not rather be continued through all the distances from the Sun to Saturn & beyond. And tho this increase of density beyond the distance of the tenth part \{be} at great distances/ may be exceeding slow yet if the elasticity \force/ of this Medium be sufficiently great it may suffice

And \in Mediums of the same density/ the {for} elastic force being {illeg} in a duplicate ratio of the distance this forc |swiftness of the vibrations| the elastic force of this \Medium/ must be 490000000000 times greater in proportion to its density then the elastic force of ye Air is in proportion to its density. < text from f 295v resumes >

I can see no reason why the increase of density should stop any where & |not be| continued through all the distances from the Sun to Saturn & beyond. And if the elastick force of this Medium \may/ be very great, it may suffice to impel bodies from the denser parts of the Medium towards the rarer with all that force wch wee call gravity. And that this|e| elastick force \of this Medium/ is very great may be gathered from the swiftness of its vibrations. Sounds move about 1140 feet English feet in a minute second of time & therefo in eight minutes they move about 10323 mile English miles. Light moves from the Sun to us in eight minutes & {illeg} which distance is about 72000000 English miles supposing the horizont{a}ll Parallax of the Sun to be about 12″. And the vibrations of this Medium, that they may cause <293v> the alternate fits of easy transmission & easy reflexion must be swifter then & by consequence above 700000 times swifter then sounds. And therefore the elastick force of this Medium in proportion to its density must be above 700000 x 700000 times greater then the elastick force of the Air is in proportion to its density.

Qu

Qu. 22. Is not all sensation |Is not vision performed by the vibrations of this spirit excited in the bottom of the eye by the rays of light? And is not hearing performed & propagated through the \uniform solid &/ pellucid capellamenta of the auditory nerves in the place of sensation. And is not the | performed by the vibrations either of this \or some other/ Medium, (or of the Electric spirit, \perha/ excited in the bottom of the eye by light {on} in the auditory nerves by the tremors of the air [& in the {illeg} of \nerve {illeg}/ to the other senses by other motions; & propagated through the pellucid capillamenta of the nerves into the place of sensation] & propagated through their \pellucid/ capillamenta into the place of sensation. And so of the other senses.

Qu. 23. Is not animal motion performed by the vibrations of this Medium excited in the brain by the power of the will & propagated from thence through the \|solid &| pellucid capillamenta of the/ nerves into the muscles for contracting or dilating them? |I {illeg} suppose the capillamenta to be solid uniform & pellucid that the motion may be propagated along them uniformly without interruption.|

Qu. 24. Do not electric bodies by friction emit a subtile exhalation or spirit by wch they perform their attractions? And is not this Spirit – – – – – – – – – – – & thereby cause them to shine.

Qu. 2{illeg}|5| Are there not other original properties of light – – – – –

Qu. 23. Is not electrical attraction \& repulse/ performed by an exhalation \wch is/ raised out of the electrick body by friction & expanded & variously agita to great distances & variously agitated like a win turbulent wind|. &| \wch/ carryi|s|ng light bodies along with it. [For light bodies are not only attracted by electric bodies but also repelled & otherwise agitated in various manners. And \But/ when the electric spirit begins to \be re-/condensed & \by condensation to/ return into the electric body, \doth it not {it}/ it carry{es}|s| light bodies along with it towards the electric body & causes that attraction wch we call electrick.] & agitates them in various manners according to it own motions, making them go sometimes towards the electric body, sometimes from it & sometimes \move/ with various other motions? {illeg}|A|nd when this spirit \looses its turbulent motions &/ begins to be recondensed & by condensation to return into the \electric/ body doth it not carry light bodies along with it towards the electrick body & cause them to stick to it without further motion till they drop off? And is not this {illeg} exhalation much more subtile then common Air or Vapour? For electric bodies attract straws & such like light substances through gl a plate of glass interposed, tho not so vigorously. And may there not be other Exhalations & subtile \invisible/ Mediums which may have considerable effects in the Phænomena of nature?

And the same expe{ri} things will be \have been/ \appear/ found by rubbing a long \& large/ cylinder of glass or Ambar with a paper held in ones hand especially if the diameter of the cylinder of glass be an inch an inch or above \& continuing the friction/ till the glass gro|e|ws warm.

Qu. 31. May not the mutual attraction of the \small/ parts of small bodies be sufficiently strong to make them cohere & cause the compose \very/ hard bodies

<296r>

Qu. 17. Does not \{we}/ the passage of light through dense transparent bodies, such as are water, oyle, salts \{illeg}/, glass, crystall, spar, talk, & gemms, require that bodies be very much more porous then is usualy beleived? For if a ray of light A Magnet draws a Needle without any diminution of its vertue from the interposition of bodies not magnetical as \such as are/ water glass or crystal, silver lead quicksilver or gold the densest & least porous of all bodies. And the gravitating cause acts without sensible impediment though the bodies of the e|E|arth & Planets to their very centers so as to make them gravitate towards the Sun & towards one another in proportion to all the matter in them, & by consequence so as to make their center|ral| parts as heavy towards the Sun & towards one another as their superficial parts are in proportion to their matter. And to explain these things mechanicaly requires that the densest bodies be exceeding porous. so as to let the causes of magnetism or gravity work through them without sensible impediment And whether this porous|sit|y may not be also inferred from the passage of light through pellucid bodies is here inquired. W For whether ye rays of light be small bodies or only motion or pression propagated from shining substances, they move in right lines, & if any a ray meet with any opposition whereby it is once turned out of the way it can never after return again into ye right way unless by great accident. How bodies may be sufficiently porous to give free passage every way in {illeg} right lines to the rays of light is hard to conceive but not impossible. For you have heard above that ye colours of bodies arise from particles of certain sizes. If these particles be supposed to lye together with interstices or pores between them equal to the particles & to be compounded of other particles much smaller with intestices between them equall to ye particles & those of others still much smaller with interstices equall to the particles & so on untill you come at solid particles equal to the pores void of all pores; & if there be three degrees of particles the least of wch are solids, the body will have seven times more pores then parts; if four degrees the body will have 31 times more pores then parts least {illeg} degrees of particles the least of wch are solids the body will have 15 times more pores then parts, if five degrees the body will have 31 times more pores then parts, if six degrees it will have 63 times more pores then parts & so on. And there may be other contrivances unknown to us by wch bodies the posousness of bodies may be still encreased

Qu. 18. Is not light refracted after several manners & by several sorts of powers? An instance of double refractions |17. Are there not other original properties of the rays of light besides those already described? An instance of another two {illeg} of \original/ property| we have in \the refractions of/ Island-crystal described first by Erasmus Bartholin & afterwards more exactly by Hugenius in his book o|O|f Light \De la lumiere./. This crystal is a pellucid fusile stone {illeg} Talk clear as water or crystal of ye rock & without colour, enduring the fire a red heat without losing its transparency & in a very strong heat calcining without fusion. Steept a day or two in water it loses its natural polish. Being rubbed on cloth it attracts pieces of straws & other light things like Ambar or glass: & with Aqua fortis its makes an ebullition. It \seems to be a sort of Talc &/ is found in form of an oblique Parallelopid|p|ed with six parallelogram sides & eight angles solid angles. The obtuse angles of the Parallelograms are each of them 101 degrees & 52 minutes, the acute ones 78deg. 8min. Two of the solid angles opposite to one another as C & E are compossed each of them with three of these obtuse angles & each of the other six with one obtuse <297r> & two acute ones. It cleaves easily in planes parallel to any of its sides & no{t} in any other planes. It cleaves with a glossy polite surface not perfectly plane but with some little uneavenness. It is easily scratcht with a point of & by reason of its softness it takes a polish very difficultly. It polishes better upon polished looking-glass then upon metal & perhaps better upon pitch |leather| or parchment. Afterwards it must be rubbed with a little oyle or white of an egg to fill up its scratches: whereby it will become very transparent & polite. But for several experiments it is not necessary to polish it. If a piece of this crystalline stone be laid upon a book every letter of the book seen through it will appear double by means of a double refraction. And if any beam of light falls \either/ perpendicularly or in any angle upon any surface of this crystal it becomes divided into two beams by means of the same double refraction. Which |beams are of the same colour with the incident beam of light & seem equal to one another in the quantity of their light or very nearly equal. One of these refractions is| One of these refractions is performed by the usual r|R|ule of Opticks, the sine of incidence out of Air into this Crystal being to the sine of refraction as five to three. The other refraction, wch may be called the unusuall refraction, is performed by the following Rule.

Let A\D/BC represent the refracting surface of the Crystal, C the biggest solid angle at that surface, GEHF the opposite surface & CK a perpendicular on that surface. This perpendicular makes wth the per edge of the crystal CF an angle of 19deg. 3′. Joyne KF & in it take KL so that the angle KCL be 6deg 40′ & the angle LCF 12deg. 23′. And if ST represent any beam of light incident at T in any angle upon the refracting surface ADBC, let TV be the refracted beam determined by the given proportion of the sines 5 to 3 according to the usual rule of Opticks. Draw VX parallel & equal to KL. Draw it the same way from V in wch L lieth from K, & joyning TX this line TX shall be the other refracted beam carried from T to X by the unusual refraction.

If therefore the incident beam ST be perpendicular to the refracting surface the two beams TV & TX into wch it shall become divided shall be parallel to the lines CK & CL; one of those beams going through the crystall perpendicularly as it ought to do by the usual laws of Opticks, & the other TX by an unusual refraction diverging from the perpendicular & making with it an angle VTX of \about/ 623 degrees, as is found by experience. And hence the plane VTX & such like planes wch are parallel to the plane CFK may be called the planes of perpendicular refraction. And the /coast towards wch the \the lines/ KL & VX are drawn may be called the coast of unusual refraction.\

In like manner Crystal of the rock has a double refraction: but the difference of the two refractions is not so great & manifest as in Island Crystal.

Now I beleive it will easily be allowed that the usual re unusual refractions of these Crystalls are of a different kind from the usual, & performed by a different sort of power; they being performed by very different laws: and it may be enquired whether there are not still more kinds of refractions & refracting powers.

Qu. 18. Have not the rays of Light several original dispositions whereby they are determined to suffer several sorts of refraction? For in the foregoing experiment w|W| the incident beam ST incident on Island crystal

When the beam ST incident on Island Crystal <298r> is divided into two beams TV & TX & these two beams arrive at the further surface of the glass, the beam TV wch was refracted at the first surface after the usual manner, shall be again refracted entirely after the usual manner at the second surface & the beam TX wch was refracted after the \un-/usual manner in the first surface shall be again refracted entirely after the unusual manner in the second surface, so that both these beams shall emerge out of the second surface in lines parallel to the first incident beam ST.

And if two pieces of Island Crystal be placed one after another in such manner that all the surfaces of the latter be parallel to all the corresponding surfaces of the former: the rays wch are refacted {sic} after the usual manner in the first surface of the first crystal shall be refracted after the usual manner in all the following surfaces & the rays wch are refracted after the unusual manner in the first surface shall be refracted after the unusual manner in all the following surfaces. And therefore same thing happens tho the surfaces of the Crystalls be any {one} {illeg} And tho the surfaces of the glasses are any ways inclined to one another yet if |provided| their planes of perpendicular refraction be parallel to one another. the rays wch are refracted in th

And therefore there is an \original/ difference in the rays of light by means of wch some sort of rays are \in this experiment/ constantly refracted after the usual manner & the other|s| sort {are} constantly after the unusual manner. & this difference seems to have been in the rays before their first refraction as well as before the latter refractions because it had \has the/ |For if the difference be not original but arises from new modifications {tho} imprest on the rays of at their first refraction, it would be altered by new modifications in the three following refractions: whereas it suffers no alteration but is constant & has| the same effect upon the {illeg} \rays/ in all the refractions. |ons. The unusual refraction is therefore performed by an original property of the rays. And it remains to be enquired whether the rays have not more original properties then are yet discovered.|

Qu. 19|8|. Have not the rays of light several properties in their several sides [whereby one & the same ray falling \perpendicularly/ upon Island Crystal {illeg} |in one & the same angle of incidence, is| is or is not refracted after the unusual manner, accordingly as this or that side of the ray is \or is not/ turned towards the coast of unusual refraction?] \several sides endued wth several original dispositions or properties?/ For if the planes of perpendicular refraction of the second glass \crystal/ be at right angles wth the planes of perpendicular refraction of the first glass \crystal/ the rays wch are refracted after the usual manner in passing through the first glass \crystal/ will be all of them refracted after the \un/usuall manner in passing through the second glass \crystal/ & the rays wch are refracted after the unusuall manner in the first glass passing through the first glass \crystal/ will all of them be refracted after the usual manner in passing through the second glass \crystal./ And therefore there are not two sorts of rays differing in \their/ nature from one another, one of wch is constantly & in all positions refacted {sic} after the usual manner & the other constantly & in all positions after the unusuall manner. The difference between the two sorts of rays in the foregoing experiment \mentioned in the 19th Question/ was only in the positions of the sides of the rays to the coast of unusual refraction planes of perpendicular refraction \by the experimt mentioned/. For one & the same ray is \here/ refracted sometimes after the usual & sometimes after the unusual manner according to the position wch its sides have to the glasses crystalls. If the sides of ye same ray is|are| posited the same way to both crystalls it is refracted after ye same manner in them both: but if that side of ye ray which looks towards the coast of ye unusual refraction of ye first crystal looks {illeg} towards a coast wch is 90 degrees from the plane of the perpen <299r> dicular refraction of the second glass \be 90 degrees from that side of the same ray wch looks towards the coast of the unusual refraction of the second crystal/ (which may be effected by varying the position of the second crystal to the first & by consequence to ye rays of light) the ray \shall/ be refracted after several manners in the several crystals. There is |nothing more| required to determin whether the rays wch fall upon the second crystal shall be refracted after the usual or after the unusual manner but to turn about that|is| crystall so that the coast of \this crystalls/ unusual refraction may be on this or that side of the ray. And therefore every \ray/ may be considered as having four sides or quarters two of wch opposite to one another incline the ray to be refracted after the unusual manner as often as either of them are turned towards the coast of the co{illeg} unusual refraction, & the other two whenever either of them are turned towards the coast of unusual refraction do not incline it to be otherwise refracted then after the usual manner. The two first may therefore be called the sides of unusual refraction, & the two last the sides of usual refraction. And th since these dispositions were in th{e} rays before their incidence on the second third & fourth surfaces of the two crystals & suffered no alteration by being refacted {sic} \{illeg} (so far as appears) by the refraction of the rays/ in their passage through those surfaces, is it not reasonable to beleive & \the rays/ were refracted accoring {sic} by ye same laws in the \all/ the \f{illeg}|our|/ surfaces, is it not reasonable to beleive that they were the were those dispositions were originally \might be were originaly/ on the sides of \it {illeg} it I conclud it appears that those dispositions were in the/ the rays originally \& suffered no alteration by the first refraction/ & that by means of those dispositions the rays were refracted at the same at their incidence on the first surface of the first crystal some of them after the usual & some of them after the unusual manner accordingly as their sides of usual or unusual refraction were then turned towards the coast of \the/ unusual refraction {illeg} of that crystal. {illeg}

< insertion from the middle of f 298v > ✝Every ray of light has therefore two opposite sides originally endued wth a property on wch the unusual refraction depends & other two opposite sides not endued with that property. And it remains to be enquired whether there are not more properties of light by which the sides of the rays differ & are distinguished from one another

In explaining the difference of the sides of the rays above mentioned I have supposed that the rays fall perpendicularly on the first crystal. But if they fall obliquely on it the success is the same. Those rays wch are refracted after the usual manner in the first crystal will be refracted after the unusual manner in the second crystal \supposing the planes of perpendicular refraction to be at right angles wth one another as above/, & on the contrary.

If the planes of the perpendicular refraction of the two crystalls be neither parallel nor perpendicular to one another but contein an acute angle: the two beams of light wch emerge out of the first crystal will be each of them divided into two more at their incidence on the second crystal. For in this case the rays in each of the two beams will some of them have their sides of usual refraction some of them their sides of unusual refraction turned towards the coast of the unusual refraction of the second crystal. < text from f 299r resumes >

Qu. 20. Are not the rays of light very small bodies attracting which at their en refracted by means of certain attractions wch intercede |And b| them & the parts of pellucid bodies? For we have shewed \above/ that bodies act upon |the rays of| light at a distance in reflecting refracting & inflecting them; {but} \And by the heat wch light produces it appears that light mutually acts upon bodies &/ in or principles of Natural Philosophy, \it appears/ that if the rays of light be \little/ bodies refracted by the attraction of pellucid bodies, the sines of incidence must be to the sines of refraction in a given proportion; & the experience teaches that this is the true law \rule/ of refraction. Also by the heat wch light produces in bodies it appears yt the rays of light mutually act upon the parts of pellucid bodies & put them into a vibrating motion, & by the fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission |wch {illeg} without motion cannot do & motion cannot be propagated to \all {distances}/ in a instant {illeg} \requires/ an infinite force to generate it.| & the vibrations excited by any ray at its entrance into a pellucid medium \body/ seem to ever be propagated through the body to ye further surface & there to put the ray into a fit of easy reflexion or easy transmission accordingly as they ray arrives at that surface in the middle of a vibration or in the middle between two vibrations. And by \And by/ the unusual refractions of the rays of light in Island c|C|rystal the rays of light & the parts of the crystal seem to act upon one another by some power which resembles that of magnetism. For as the rays of li{illeg} Iron is drawn only by magnets \& magnetical bodies/ so the rays of light are refracted after the unusual manner only by {illeg} \some certain bodies namely by/ the particles of Island crystal & crystal of ye rock And as a magnet has two poles in wch its attractive vertue is placed so the rays of light have a vertue in \in two of/ their \two/ sides {of} unusual refraction) \(wch I \{thence}/ call their sides/ not much unlike a polar vertue & in their other |by means of wch they are refracted after the unusual manner when \either of/ those sides are turned towards the coast of unusual refraction, & in their other two| sides they have no such vertue. And so the parts|icles| of Island Crystal have a vertue \on one side/ by wch they draw the rays towards the coast of unusual refraction. For if every particle of ye crystal had the same vertue on every side they could \not/ cause the perpendicular rays to be refracted.Symbol (twoWavyLines) in text If light consisted \only/ in pression propa\gated {sic}/ted (as some suppose) it would not generat be able to generate motion & heat in the bodies wch refract & reflect it. If it consisted in motion <299v> pagated to all distances in an instant it would require an infinite force to generate that The rays of \motion./ Light moves in right lines without divergin bending towards \any/ bending or spreading into dark the shadow beyond the bounds of those right lines in wch it begins to move. But pression or motion propag cannot be propagated in a fluid without \bending &/ spreading every way into the in right lines without bending & spreading every way from those lines into the quiescent part of the shadow in right lines in a fluid but will \bend &/ spread {illeg} every |in a fluid in right lines beyond an{illeg} obstacle wch stops part of the motion, but will of necessity {illeg} bends & spreads every way| from those lines into the quiescent medium which lies behind the obstacle The waves of water bend very much, sound bends less yet \the sound of a bell/ may be heard beyond in a valley where a hill is between your ear & the bell{illeg} sounding Bell. But the light of the sun & stars \is not visible/ when they are behind the Moon in eclipses \So/ Gravity tends downwards but the pressure of fluids arising from gravity tends every way with equal force & is propagated as readily & wth as much force through crooked passages as through streight ones. The waves of water passing by the sides of a broad obstacle bend & dilate themselves gradualy into the quiet water behind the obstacle.{illeg} Sounds The undulations \waves or vibrations/ of ye Air wherein sounds consist bend less then ye waves of water, yet bend manifestly. For a Bell or a Canon may be heard tho a hill be between the sounding body & the ear over a hill wch intercepts the sight of ye sounding body & sounds are propagated as ready|i|ly through crooked pipes as through streight ones. But light bends not into ye shadow for the fixt stars by the interposition of any of ye Planets cease to be seen & so do the parts of the Sun by the interposition of Venus Mercury or the Moon. The rays wch pass by \very neare/ the edges of \any/ bodi|y|es are bent {illeg} a little \by some action of the body/ as we shewed above, but this bending is not towards but from ye shadow & is performed {illeg} only in ye passage by ye body. So soon as the ray is past the body it goes right on wthout. To explain the double refraction of Island Crystal by pression or motion propagated has \not/ hitherto been attempted except by (to my knowledge) except by Hugenius who for yt end supposed two several vibrating Mediums: but when he found \out/ the experiments mentioned in the two \last/ p\r/eceding Questions, he confest himself at a loss. |For| Pressions or motions propated {sic} f{illeg} \from/ a shining body through an uniform medium must be \{one} must be/ on all sides alike; \but/ \whereas/ bodies propag|at|ed may have different properties in their several sides & so have the rays of light whereas by those experiments it appears that ye rays of light have different properties in the|ir| several sides. He \{illeg}/ suspected |ye| the pulses of æther might receive certain new modifications wch might determin them to be propated {sic} in this or that Medium according to ye position of the second crystal; but what modifications those might be he could not imagin \say/ nor think of any thing satisfactory in this point: whereas & its more difficult to imagin how such modifications can be in the rays originally if they light be nothing else then pression or motion propagated through fluids. For the refractions reflexions inflexions & colours of light depend on such properties as are in the rays orig\in/ally & suffer no change by the passing of the rays through several medium's [whereas ye Hypotheses that light suffers several changes consists in pression or motion propagated render the rays of light liable to new modifications, such as are the rotation of globuli, & the obliquity \& splitting/ of pulses, & the propagation of {illeg} motion from one |single| medium to two others, &|And| by such new modifications the authors of those Hypothes|es| place the difference of colours & ye double refractions of Island Crystall whereas the refractio colours of light depend on original & immutable properties of the rays \labour endeavour to/ explain the phænomena of colours & refractions.] & therefore all Hypotheses are to be laid aside \in/ wch those phænomena are derived from new modifations {sic} of ye rays.

<300r>

Qu. 19. Are not all Hypotheses erroneous which have hitherto been invented for explaining the phenomena of light by new modifications of the rays. For all those phenomena of light \hitherto explained by them/ hitherto known (viz. the different refrangibility & inflexions reflexibility & inflexibility of its rays & all the diversity of colours & the unusual refraction of Island Crystal) depend not upon new modifications, \as has been supposed/ but upon the original & unchangeable properties of the rays.

Qu. 20. Are not all Hypotheses erroneous in wch light is supposed to consist in pression or motion propagated through a fluid Medium? For in all these Hypothese the phænomena of light have been hitherto explained by supposing that they arise from new modifications of the rays: wch is an erroneous supposition.

If light consisted only in pression propagated without actual motionit would not be able to agitate & heat the bodies wch refract & reflect it. If it consisted in motion propagated to all distances in an instant, it would require an infinite force every moment in every shining particle to generate that motion. And if it consisted in either pression or motion propagated {illeg} or \either/ in an instant or in time it would bend into the shadow. For pression or motion cannot be propagated in a fluid in right lines beyond an obstacle wch stops part of the motion, but \will/ bends & spreads every way into the quiescent medium wch lyes beyond the obstacle. Gravity tends downwards, but the pressure of water arising from Gravity tends every way with equal force & is propagated as readily & with as much force through crooked passages as through streight ones. The waves on the surface of water passing by the sides of a broad obstacl{illeg}e bend & dilate themselves every way gradualy into the quiet water behind the obstacle. The waves pulses or vibrations of the Air wherein sounds consist bend manifestly, tho not so much as the waves of water. For a b|B|ell or a Canon may be heard beyond a hill wch intercepts the sight of the sounding body, & sounds are propagated as readily through crooked pipes as through streight ones. But light is never known to follow crooked passages nor to bend into the shadow. For the fixt stars by the interposition of any of the Planets cease to be seen, & so do the parts of ye Sun by the interposition of the Moon Mercury or Venus. The rays wch pass very near to the edges of any body are bent a little by the action of the body as we shewed above, but this bending is not towards but from the shadow & is performed only in the passage of the ray by the body \& at a very small distance from it./. So soon as the ray is past the body, it goes right on.

To explain the unusual refraction of Island Crystal by pression or motion propagated has not hitherto been attempted (to my knowledge) except by Hugenius who for that end supposed two several vibrating Mediums within that Crystal. But when he tried the refractions in two several pieces o successive pieces of that crystal & found them such as is mentioned above: he confessed himself at <301r> a loss for explaining them. For pressions or motions propagated from a shining body through an uniform Medium must be on all sides alike: whereas by those experiments it appears that the rays of light have different properties in their different sides. He suppos suspected that the pulses of Æther in passing through the first crystal might receive certain new modifications wch might determin them to be propagated in this or that Medium within the second crystal according to the position of that crystal, but what modifications those might be he could not say nor think of any thing satisfactory in that point.[2] And if had known that ye unusual refraction depends not on new modifications but on the original & unchangeable dispositions of the rays, he would have found it as difficult to explain how those dispositions which he supposed to be imprest on the rays by the first Crystal could be in them before their incidence on that Crystal, & in general how all rays emitted by shining bodies can have those dispositions in them from the beginning. To me at least this seems inexplicable if light be nothing else then motion pression or motion propagated through Æther.

And it is as difficult to explain by these Hypotheses how rays can be alternately in fits of easy reflexion & easy transmission; unless perhaps one might suppose that there are in all space two ethereal vibrating Mediums & that the vibrations of one of them constitute light & that the vibrations of the other being swifter, as often as they overtake the vibrations of the first, put them into those fits. But to allow two æthers where we have no evidence for so much as one, to suppose that two æthers may be together in all spaces without mixing with one another so as to become one Medium & to suppose \also/ that they may have distinct vibrations without making two sorts of light, are difficulties wch I cannot get over. And that there are no such fluid Mediums I gather by the following argument regular & very lasting motions of Planets & Comets through the heavens in all manner of positions: {illeg}|For| thence it is manifest that the heavens are void of all sensible resistance, & by consequence of all sensible matter.

For the resisting \power/ of fluid Mediums arises partly from the attrition of the parts of the Medium & partly from the Vis inertiæ of the matter. That part of the resistance of a spherical body wch arises from the attrition of the parts of the Medium is as the factum of the diameter {or}|&| the velocity of the spherical body \very nearly/ & that part of the resistance wch arises from the Vis inertiæ of the matter is as the square of that factum. And by this means \difference/ the two sorts of resistance may be distinguished from one another \in any Medium/ & being distinguished it will be found that almost \all/ the resistance of bodies of a competent magnitude moveing in Air Water & Quicksilver |& such like fluids| with a competent velocity arises from the Vis inertiæ of the parts of the fluid. For this I have found true by Experiments made with Pendulums. And hence I conclude that all \æther & all subtile/ Mediums whatever which are as dense as air water or quicksilver, have almost as great a resisting power as the fluids of air water or quicksilver to wch they are equal in density. where \supposing that/ bodies of a competent magnitude move in those fluids with a competent velocity, as in the experiments of the pendulums.

{For} \Now/ that part of the resistance|ing| wch arises from power of any Medium wch arises from the tenacity or attrition of the parts of the Medium may be diminished by dividing

<359r>

meet before they come into the brain, but the Optick Nerves of such animals as do not look the same way with both eyes (i|a|s of Fishes & the Chameleon) do not meet if I am rightly informed

Qu. 16. Are not When a man in the dark presses either corner of his eye with his finger & turns his eye away from his finger, he will see a circle of colours like those in the feather of a Peacocks taile?|.| Do not these colours arise from such motions excited in the bottom of ye eye by the pressure of the finger, as at other times are excited \in|there| the bottom of the eye/ by light for causing vision?

<477v>

When I made these Observations I designed to repeat \most of/ them with more care & exactness & to make some others \new ones/ for determining the manner how the rays of light are bent in their passages by bodies for making these f{illeg} fringes \of colours/ wth ye dark lines between them: but \but/ I was then interrupted & cannot now think of taking these things into further consideration. And since I have have not finished this part of my designe &|I| shall conclude with proposing \{illeg} only/ some Quæres in ort|d|er to a further search to be made by others in these matters by others. [who may take these things into consideration]

Quære 1. Do not Bodies act upon light at a distance & by their action bend its rays & is not this action strongest at ye least distance. 1 B. Are not &c < insertion from the bottom of f 478r > 1 B. Are not the rays of light in passing by the edges \& sides/ of bodies bent \several times/ backwards, & forwards with a motion like that of an Eele. < text from f 477v resumes >

2 Are not the rays more or less flexible accordingly as they are more or less refrangible, \Do not the rays wch differ in refrangibility differ also in {illeg} flexibility/ & are they not \& are they not/ |&| by their different inflexions made at equall distances from ye bodies \are they not/ separated from one another so as {illeg} after separation to make the \colours in the/ three fringes of colours above described. |And after what manner are they inflected to make those fringes.|

3 Do not the rays of light wch fall upon bodies \& are reflected or refracted/ begin to bend before they arive at ye bodies, & are they not reflected refracted & inflected by one & ye same Principle acting variously in various circumstances.

4 Do not light & bodies act mutually upon one another, that is to say bodies upon light in emitting reflecting refracting & inflecting it, & light mutu <478r> ally upon bodies for heating them & putting their parts into a vibrating motion wherein heat consists. And do not black bodies conceive heat more easily from light then those /\ < insertion from lower down f 478r > ‡ A) 4. {illeg} {And} Do not black bodies conceive heat more easily \from light/ then those of other colours \do,/ by reason that ye light falling on them is not reflected back but enters ye bodies & is often reflected & refracted within them before it be stifled & lost. And is not the greatness \or vigour/ the action between light & sulphureous bodies observed above one reason why sulphureous bodies conceived heat & burn \take fire/ more readily & \burn/ more vehemently then other bodies do? < text from f 478r resumes >

5 Do not all \fixt/ bodies when heated beyond a certain degree emit light by the vibrating motion of their parts.

6 Is not fire a body heated so hot as to emit light copiously. For what else is a red hot iron \or a red hot stone/ then fire & what else is a burning coale then red hot wood |[whose heat is preserved by the actions of an acid spirit in the air \acting upon by/ dissolving the wood|

7 Is not flame a vapour \fume/ or exhalation heated \red hot that is/ so hot as to shine For {illeg} bodies do not \do not/ flame wch do not emit a \copious/ fume.

8 Are not the sun & fixt stars great earths vehemently hot whose heat is conserved by the mutuall action & reaction between them & the light wch they emit & whose parts are kept from fuming away by the vast weight of the Atmospheres incumbent upon them.

9 Do not the rays of light in falling upon the Tunica retina bottom of the eye excite vibrations in ye Tunica retina wch vibrations being propagated along the \solid/ fibres of ye Optick Nerves into the brain cause the sense of seeing. And are not the{illeg} vibrations made by several sorts of rays |*| < insertion from the bottom of f 478r > * For since dense bodies conserve their heat a long time & the densest bodies conserve their heat the longest, the vibrations of their parts are of a lasting nature & therefore may be propagated along \solid/ fibres of uniform dense matter to a great distance for conveying into the brain the impressions made upon all the Organs of sense. For that motion wch can continue long in any one part one & ye same part of a body can be propagated a long way from one part to another supposing the body homogeneal so that ye motion may not be reflected refracted {&} interrupted or disordered by {the} any uneavenness of the body. < text from f 478r resumes > \10 And/ Do not several sorts of rays make vibrations of several bignesses, the {illeg} wch according to their {illeg} several bignesses {illeg} excite sensations of several colours much after the manner that several the vibrations of ye air according to their several bignesses exite {sic} sensations of several sounds? And \particularly/ do not the most refrangible rays excite the shortest vibrations for making a sensation of \deep/ violet, the least refrangible the largest for making a sensation of deep red & the \several/ intermediate \sorts of/ rays vibrations of \several/ intermediate bignesses to make sensations of \the several/ intermediate colours?

11 May not the harmony & discord of colours arise from the proportions of the vibrations {illeg} the like \and oth/ \propagated \through the optic nerves/ into the brain/ \as/ the harmony & discord of sounds \arises from the proportions of ye vibrations of ye air/. |For some colours are agreable as the|ose| colours of gold & Indigo & others disagree.|

11|2|. May {illeg} Are not the species of objects seen wth both eyes united where the Optick nerves meet before they come into the brain: For the fibres on the right side of both Nerves uniting there & \after union/ going thence into ye brain \in the nerve wch is/ on the right side of the head & the fibres on the left side of both nerves uniting in the same place & after union going \into the brain in the nerve wch is/ on the left side of the head into ye brain & these two nerves meeting again in the brain in such a manner that their fibres make but one intire species half of wch {illeg} on ye right side of ye sensorium & comes from ye right side of both eyes & the other half of wch on ye left side of ye sensorium comes from ye left side of both eyes? For the optic nerves of such animals as look the same way with both eyes (as of Men, Doggs, Sheep, Oxen) meet before they go into the brain, but the optic nerves of such animals as do not look the same way wth both eyes (as of Fishes & the Chameleon) do \not/ meet i{f} I am rightly informed.

7B. Is not the

7B. Is not the greatness of the action between light & sulphureous bodies observed above, one reason why sulphureous bodies conceive heat & burn more readily |& more vehemently| then other bodies do.

[1] Mais pour dire comment cela se fait, je n'ay rien trove jusqu' ici qui me sati fasse. C.H. de la lumiere. c. 5. p 91.

[2] Mais pour dire comment cela se fait, je n'{illeg}ay rien trouvé jusqu'ici qui me satisfasse. C.H. De la lumiere. c. 5. p 91.

© 2017 The Newton Project

Professor Rob Iliffe
Director, AHRC Newton Papers Project

Scott Mandelbrote,
Fellow & Perne librarian, Peterhouse, Cambridge

Faculty of History, George Street, Oxford, OX1 2RL - newtonproject@history.ox.ac.uk

Privacy Statement

  • University of Oxford
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council
  • JISC