<78r>

To the Rt Honble Sidney Lord Godolphin Ld High Treasurer of England.

May it please yor Lordp

According to yor Lordps direction we have examined the values of several forreign coyns & endeavoured to inform orselves of the values of gold in proportion to silver in several nations & considered the ways of preserving the coyn. And by the Accompts we have met with Gold is higher in England then in France by about 9d or 10d in the Guinea, then in Holland by 11d or 12d in the Guinea, then in Germany & Italy by 12d in the Guinea or above. In Spain & Portugal Gold is higher then in England by about |1|10d\d/ in the Guinea. For the great quantity of silver coming from the West-Indies has brought down the price of silver in all Europe in proportion to gold & principally in Spain where the Bullion first arrives. The low price mends the market and carries silver from Spain into all Europe & from all Europe to the East-Indies & China, the Merchand|t| bidding more for it then it goes for among the natives. In Spain the Merchants advance about six ꝑ cent for silver & sometimes above, at wch rate a Guinea is worth about 21s. 2d14 & sometimes less. In England they advance 3d or 4d ꝑ ounce, & at the rate of 3d ꝑ ounce advance, a Guinea is worth but 20s. 6d16.

Gold is therefore at too high a rate in England by about 10d or 12d in the Guinea. And this tending to the decrease of the silver coyn, we humbly conceive that one way of preserving this coyn is to lower the price of gold, suppose by taking 6d, 9d or 12d from the price of the Guinea so as that gold may be of the same value in England as in the neighbouring parts of Europe. France has set us an Example for in the last war when the Lewid'or was raised there to 14 livres the Ecu was raised only to 72 sols but it is now raised to 76 sols thô the Lewid'or be raised only to 14 livres as before. So that Gold in respect of silver is lower in France now then in the last war in the proportion of 76 to 72 that is by above 13d12 in the Guinea.

The licensing the exportation of Bullion whilst the exportation of money is prohibited seems to be another cause of the decrease of or silver coyn. For {illeg}|this| makes silver worth more uncoyned then coyned & thereby stops the coynage & causes the melting down of the money in private for exportation. We are humbly of opinion that care should be taken rather to set the price of money above that of Bullion & to bring Bullion through the Mint, silver being <78v> more apt to stay with us in the usefull form of money then in the useless form of Bullion, & encreasing the coyn whilst it stay with us in the form of money. For wch reason it may be better to licence the exportation of money then that of Bullion, or at least to licence the exportation of so much money as shall be coyned out of forreign Bullion: which whenever it shall be thought fit may be convenient done after some such manner as is expressed in the scheme hereunto annexed.

{For} t|T|he safety & encrease of the money depends \principally/ on the ballance of trade. If the ballance of trade be against us the money will be melted down & exported to pay debts abroad & carry on trade in spight of laws to the contrary: and if the ballance of trade be for us such laws are needless & even hurtfull to trade. If trade can be so ordered that no branch of it be detrimental to the nation the money will be safe. For which end luxury in forreign commodities should be checkt & the exportation of our own commodities promoted. If a law were made & well executed against trading with more gold & silver by any Merchant or Company of Merchants then in certain proportions to the value of the good exported, such an addition to the Act of Navigation might put Merchants upon searching out sufficient ways of vending our commodities abroad & as we humbly conceive be more effectual for preserving the coyn then the absolute prohibition of the exportation thereof. Vpon extraordinary occasions a law against exporting money may during the occasion be sometimes of advantage: but such a standing law cramps trade & thereby may be more effectual to prevent the importation of silver then to keep in the money.

As for the alteration of the standard we are humbly of opinion that if the value of the several species to be hereafter coyned be diminished without changing the denomination it will occasion the melting down & recoyning the species already coyned, for the profit that may be made thereby. And if the value be encreased the people will value their g|G|oods by the old money already coyned in wch they are to be paid and the new money of greater value (if any shall be coyned) will be pickt out for exportation, & the Importer who coyns it will lose the overvalue to the discouragement of the coynage, & in payments made by tale to forreigners the nation will also lose the overvalue.

But if it be proposed to retain the value of the several species or quantity of fine silver therein & only to alter the Allay: we are humbly of opinion that if small money which by continual use wears away fast & is apt to be lost, were coyned of coarse allay as is done in several Countries abroad, provided it were well coyned to prevent counterfeiting, such money would weare longer & be less apt to be lost or melted down or exported. By small money we understand g|G|roats, three pences, two pences & pence, unless the penny by reason of its <79r> smalness should be coyned of copper.

All which is most humbly submitted to yor

Lordps great wisdome

Mint Office.
2 Iuly, 1702.

© 2024 The Newton Project

Professor Rob Iliffe
Director, AHRC Newton Papers Project

Scott Mandelbrote,
Fellow & Perne librarian, Peterhouse, Cambridge

Faculty of History, George Street, Oxford, OX1 2RL - newtonproject@history.ox.ac.uk

Privacy Statement

  • University of Oxford
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council
  • JISC