Catalogue Entry: THEM00220

^[1] Apud Theod l. 2. c. 8.

^[2] Socr. Eccles. Hist. l. 1 . c. 8. Sozom. l. 1. c. 12

^[3] Theodorit. Eccl. Hist. l. 1. c. 4.

^[4] The contents of this note are only visible in the diplomatic transcript because they were deleted on the original manuscript

^[5] In Hom. de expositione symboli

^[6] Serm. 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62.

^[7] Agustin de fide et symbolo Tom 3 fol. 30. Et de Symbolo ad Catechumenos lib 1. Tom. 9. fol. 227.

^[7] Agustin de fide et symbolo Tom 3 fol. 30. Et de Symbolo ad Catechumenos lib 1. Tom. 9. fol. 227.

^[8] Theod. l. 2. c. 22

^[9] Theod. l. 4. c. 9

^[10] Socr. l. 3. c. 7 Sozom. l.      

^[11] Epiphan Her. 26.

^[12] Iren. l. 3. c 11. & l. 1. c. 25.

^[13] Iren l. 1. c. 34.

^[14] Iren. l. 3. c. 4.

^[15] Epiphan Hæres. 30 sect. 3.

^[16] Epiphan Hæres. 30 sect 3

^[17] Ib. sect. 14 & 16.

^[18] Epiphan. Hæres 42. {Definit} 24.

^[19] b Tavernier

^[20] Extat Epistola in Tomis Conciliorum.

^[21] a Irenæus l. 1. {illeg} Tertullian ad {Iu}dæos p: 212

^[22] Socr. l 1.c.23. Sozom. l. 2. c. {illeg}

^[23] b Sozom. l. 2. c. 21

^[24] Socr. l.2.c.10

^[25] The contents of this note are only visible in the diplomatic transcript because they were deleted on the original manuscript